36 Minute mark.
Sounds like LA will take a run at PLD.
Attack of the Berg!!!
36 Minute mark.
Sounds like LA will take a run at PLD.
Again, for 8 years 8+ no way no thank you not PLD.. You can't just be looking at his big 70+ point potential.. is he seriously a player who you think gives his ALL to this team for 8 years????What I see is a big PF who can put 70 pts + that can play both LW/C (Dach and Suzuki are both RH center) U25 yrs
That's not type of player that is available each year and even less a player that is interested in playing in MTL
8m will quickly become like 6m for this yearAgain, for 8 years 8+ no way no thank you not PLD.. You can't just be looking at his big 70+ point potential.. is he seriously a player who you think gives his ALL to this team for 8 years????
I think everyone knows that Pierre-Luc Dubois won't be a saviour
But he's a really good player that fit the same groupe of age of our core players and how many players of that caliber have wanted to play in MTL in the past 25 years ? That's something that need to be take in considerations, we probably won't have that opportunity again to sign a long-term deal to a player of PLD caliber.
Why ? PLD is only 1 year older then Suzuki
PlayoffsOn the other hand he doesn't have as good a reputation as Caufield and Suzuki especially in terms of playoffs and in Dubois's case the contract is more about paying for what you've done instead of paying for what you might do compared to those other two.
And it does bring something we don't have. I mean trading for Debrincat would't make that much sense since we have Caufield.If the thinking is always "he's not going to be our savior," those people will never be ready to acquire anyone or sign a free agent. Because one player won't turn it all around. But adding Player A, then Player B, then bringing in Players XYZ will altogether be difference makers.
And others who think "he doesn't make us a contender," will simply want the Habs to tank every year and then suddenly become a perennial contender at the snap of a finger.
You need to build the team whether via draft, trade or free agency. Every move doesn't have to be the "one" that changes the team's fortunes at the turn of a dime.
And potentially adding PLD will be part of the building blocks. He won't be the missing block to completes it all.
Again, for 8 years 8+ no way no thank you not PLD.. You can't just be looking at his big 70+ point potential.. is he seriously a player who you think gives his ALL to this team for 8 years????
Interesting juxtaposition — would the package needed to trade for Dubois (assume a sign & trade) be less, similar or more than the package needed to trade for Keller?Go after Keller
So according to the main board, LA is in the running.
I hope Hugo keep their heads about them and don't do anything stupid.
Some type of combination of Florida 1st, Dvorak, Beck, Harris, Roy, Mesar, Kidney, Engstrom. These are the assets I'd be okay departing with varying degrees of value and combinations.
NO DACH!
8 years in the 8 mil range.
If LA does better for both Winnipeg and PLD, than so be it!
Don't do anything Stupid Kent, let him go to LA!!!
Go after Keller
Well I would think Keller might cost an extra asset considering he is inked for another 4 years and at a reasonable cap hit. But I definitely think he is worth itInteresting juxtaposition — would the package needed to trade for Dubois (assume a sign & trade) be less, similar or more than the package needed to trade for Keller?
Of course, two players with different attributes but just on the question of outgoing assets, wondering how close it might be.
I think our buddy is well plugged!@dinodebino — don’t PM him, whatever you tell him will end up on Twitter!![]()
So according to the main board, LA is in the running.
I hope Hugo keep their heads about them and don't do anything stupid.
Some type of combination of Florida 1st, Dvorak, Beck, Harris, Roy, Mesar, Kidney, Engstrom. These are the assets I'd be okay departing with varying degrees of value and combinations.
NO DACH!
8 years in the 8 mil range.
If LA does better for both Winnipeg and PLD, than so be it!
Oh yeah....I'd throw the Calgary first rounder in there, but if that gets added to the equation with all the conditions attached, HFboards is likely to crash based on key stroke usage....throw that Calgary 1st rounder in there as well (and take Beck out)...
I think so too. He’s got some interesting material.I think our buddy is well plugged!
Oh yeah....I'd throw the Calgary first rounder in there, but if that gets added to the equation with all the conditions attached, HFboards is likely to crash based on key stroke usage.
Beck is awesome, but projects as a third line centre max. PLD is a very solid #2. Beck might be the piece that has to go.
I’d like to hold on to Beck for the reasons you gave. Plus, I’d want to see how far we can take his development. Beck is a no-go for me too....Beck looks like one of those guys that you win with...scoring is great, but when you are getting it done well at both ends of the ice, that's just as important, imo...much the same as giving up on Dach for PLD; Dach has that potential to be an all-around better player that can do it all at both ends (he just needs to learn how to win a freakin' faceoff)...we have a young, exciting team for the first time in A LONG TIME; let's not "give up the farm" for a GOOD, not GREAT, commodity when we aren't "there" yet...
Not true, at C, Dach was playing 20 minutes a night. Ottawa’s coach even said Dach is the guy they were trying to contain.You guys hope to see Suzuki hit the 80-85+ points a season?
Then put someone like PLD as center (And I mean like him, doesn't have to be him either) on the team and you'll get your 85+ points player......or we can just keep using Suzuki to run after the Matthews, McDavid, Hughes and company every single games with Caufield next to him and keep hurting their production.
LA did it with Danault to help Kopitar, who had his 2 best seasons offensively in a about 4-5 years cause he wasn't alone anymore to do the heavy lifting.
Dach is good, no doubt, but that 1-2 punch forced Suzuki in taking all the heavy lifting.
It's fair that you prefer not bringing him for that amount of years and for that cap hit. I disagree, but we don't have to agree on that.
But what gives you the impression that he wouldn't give it his all if he's here for 7-8 years?
I’d like to hold on to Beck for the reasons you gave. Plus, I’d want to see how far we can take his development. Beck is a no-go for me too.
I'd like to hold onto Beck too. But if Chevy calls Hugo and says....this is the final offer....31st + Beck, you guys would say no?...Beck looks like one of those guys that you win with...scoring is great, but when you are getting it done well at both ends of the ice, that's just as important, imo...much the same as giving up on Dach for PLD; Dach has that potential to be an all-around better player that can do it all at both ends (he just needs to learn how to win a freakin' faceoff)...we have a young, exciting team for the first time in A LONG TIME; let's not "give up the farm" for a GOOD, not GREAT, commodity when we aren't "there" yet...