Redux91
I do Three bullets.
Well thank christ for that lolActually, don't answer that. We can agree to disagree on that one, no need to have any further discussion on my end.
This has all seemed a bit too much for you anyway
Well thank christ for that lolActually, don't answer that. We can agree to disagree on that one, no need to have any further discussion on my end.
The argument is Suzuki is more or less the same level as PLD and people act like they're not in the same league or just middle of the road players which I find really funny.What a silly argument.
Do you really think that Suzuki would only have 66 points if Caufield remained heathy all year?
Do you really think Suzuki would have only 66 points if he got to play with Connor, Ehlers, Wheeler, Morrisey and Scheifele?
You just sound ridiculous here.
I think he's an above average top 6 forward personally, a 2A center, but fair enough. I do agree at the time that we should have kept Danault and thought it was foolish to let him walk over 500k, but in hindsight he probably would have helped keep us out of the basement the last two seasons.87th in the NHL in points. 4th on his team (which was a playoff bubble team). Realistically probably the 5th best player because of Ehlers (although debatable). I think middle-of-the-road is a perfect way to describe PLD. Personally, I prefer Danault, who would have cost way less to sign.
But let's agree to disagree. I just totally think it is very normal that some people are not dropping their pants to get PLD - he's not some sort of super stud hockey megastar. He's an average top-6 forward.
What makes you so sure PLD will sign here if he becomes UFA? Money talk and some team will offer 10m for a 25yo 6f3 65points center...
Luckily Hugo is trying to bring him home before that as any good manager would do.
That all depends on where they see our defensive prospects of the future.If they trade Barron to get Dubois a year early, I will officially lose faith in this management group.
I can't imagine they would be stupid enough to do this.
If they trade Barron to get Dubois a year early, I will officially lose faith in this management group.
I can't imagine they would be stupid enough to do this.
If we get PLD then that 10m pretty much evaporates so clearing out 4.5m would give us some good flexibility. If Winnipeg doesn't want Dvorak I don't think it would be a sticking point for us but it's certainly desirable from our POV.I'm thinking the Jets don't want excess salary like Dvo. But they may want Anderson.
But why do we need to ship salary. We have plenty of cap space. I think we'll roughly have 10M in cap space after we resign Cole and the rest of the RFA's.
That all depends on where they see our defensive prospects of the future.
If Guhle, Xhekaj, Harris, Hutson and Mailloux all project higher than Barron, than I would be willing to trade our 6th best d prospect in a package for PLD.
I am not saying that is where I place him, simply that we are pretty deep at D for the future and could possibly part with Barron. I would place his current value at ~ the Florida pick.
Let's say we do Dvorak and Barron. Retaining Florida pick with which we pick ASP (Reinbacher probably gone)
Would you part with Barron while still having the above 5 young D men + ASP + Engstrom?
I would.
I don't want to wait for UFA
I'm not certain he would sign here. I'm more than willing to roll the dice though because my interest in acquiring him is solely as an unrestricted free agent.
Let me ask you this: if money talks and some team will offer him $10 million, why on earth would Dubois sign with the Canadiens a year before reaching free agency for a smaller number?
If the answer is because he wants to be a Montreal Canadien, then explain to me again why he won't sign here as a free agent?
It's this type of thinking that lead Bergevin to hold onto Beaulieu and Tinordi for so long. There's a time for hoping your magic beans turn into something and there's a time to trade your magic beans for something real. Losing out on a young 6'3 center who has actually proven himself in the NHL because you think he should have to exclusively want to play for you is way more incompetent.I'm only interested if we wait til UFA and I would be furious if we surrendered a 6'2 right shot defensemen that skates as well Barron to acquire a forward who allegedly wants to come here anyway.
That would be gross incompetence on the management level.
Because being a habs 1 year in advance and signing a ~8.5 M x 7 years contract is still a great scenario for Dubois. He also doesn't know if teams will offer him 10M if he waits a year.
Habs need to get him now, as ufa will command more $$ and more GM's throwing $$ at himSo let me see if I have this right:
Dubois is apparently eager to join the Montreal Canadiens, and if they trade for him this summer he will sign a 7-year deal at $8.5 million.
For reasons unknown, he will not sign at $8.5 million if he reaches free agency, he will instead get offered $10 million, and that's why Montreal needs to trade for him now.
Why doesn't he just wait until UFA status to get the bigger pay day? Why does he sign this summer if Montreal trades for him?
And conversely, you seem to want to have it both ways: On one hand, Dubios is willing to sign for $8.5 this summer because he might not get $10 million as a free agent and, at the same time, we can't wait for him to reach free agency... because he will get $10 million and "money talks."
You're talking about of both sides of your mouth here.
It's this type of thinking that lead Bergevin to hold onto Beaulieu and Tinordi for so long. There's a time for hoping your magic beans turn into something and there's a time to trade your magic beans for something real. Losing out on a young 6'3 center who has actually proven himself in the NHL because you think he should have to exclusively want to play for you is way more incompetent.
It's also this type of thinking that lead Gainey to trade McDonagh for Gomez.It's this type of thinking that lead Bergevin to hold onto Beaulieu and Tinordi for so long. There's a time for hoping your magic beans turn into something and there's a time to trade your magic beans for something real. Losing out on a young 6'3 center who has actually proven himself in the NHL because you think he should have to exclusively want to play for you is way more incompetent.
Habs need to get him now, as ufa will command more $$ and more GM's throwing $$ at him
get him at the draft, or he won't be here. $$ talks over "I want to play of the habs"
It's also this type of thinking that lead Gainey to trade McDonagh for Gomez.
I try not to think too much about this one. Still a bit too fresh for my liking.Then why on earth would Dubois sign a contract with any team this summer? He would be stupid to do so if he can make more money in 12-months.
And Sergechev for Drouin.
If we get PLD then that 10m pretty much evaporates so clearing out 4.5m would give us some good flexibility. If Winnipeg doesn't want Dvorak I don't think it would be a sticking point for us but it's certainly desirable from our POV.
On the downside Winnipeg will care about real dollars not just cap hit, and Dvorak is making 5.75m in actual salary the next 2 years. And on our side Dvorak has a M-NTC (8 team no trade list) that kicks in soon so if the plan is to trade him we would probably want to do it by the draft.
the peg will gut the team, DVO is not what they will want. I think it will be a rebuild thereyeah, if Winnipeg would take Dvo it would be good. But on the flip side, I still think he can get his trade value up with us if he plays wing with good offensive players... Note, in his first year with us, he scored at a 48 points in 82 games pace, a career high. How many points would he get playing wing with Suzuki, Dach or Dubois?
So let me see if I have this right:
Dubois is apparently eager to join the Montreal Canadiens, and if they trade for him this summer he will sign a 7-year deal at $8.5 million.
For reasons unknown, he will not sign at $8.5 million if he reaches free agency, he will instead get offered $10 million, and that's why Montreal needs to trade for him now.
Why doesn't he just wait until UFA status to get the bigger pay day? Why does he sign this summer if Montreal trades for him?
And conversely, you seem to want to have it both ways: On one hand, Dubios is willing to sign for $8.5 this summer because he might not get $10 million as a free agent and, at the same time, we can't wait for him to reach free agency... because he will get $10 million and "money talks."
You're talking about of both sides of your mouth here.
It sounds like you are only "allegedly" interested in PLD which is fine you don't have to like the player or want him on the team but don't pretend it's gross mismanagement and that he's not worth a guy who might not even be able to crack our NHL roster in training camp.I'm not sure who you think you are arguing with here, but it's certainly not me.
At no time have I made the claim that Dubois "exclusively wants to play" here. I have, in fact, repeatedly said that he "allegedly" wants to play here.
What I have said is that I'm only interested in him if he wants to come here as a free agent. I am not interested in surrendering picks and prospects to add at 65 point forward at an $8 million plus cap hit.
Even as a free agent, with no assets surrendered, I'm not really interested if the cost moves north of $8.5 million.
It was a bad trade for sure but would it have been bad trade had we gotten a 24 year old Gomez, probably not. Also worth mentioning is that not only did we go to the ECF twice over the next 5 years after that trade, we also had arguably the best development from our prospect group in the past 30 years in no small part because prospects develop best when surrounded by other good players, as well as by playing in and contributing to important playoff games. If you ever heard Carey Price talk about the 2010 playoff run where he sat on the bench for most of he says it was a big part of him becoming the player he ended up being. So arguably going after Gomez (Or player like him) was the right call and the only mistake was overpaying.It's also this type of thinking that lead Gainey to trade McDonagh for Gomez.
There’s a huge difference - Fla 1st pick may or may not become McDonagh. Historical probability says a 17OA won’t…It's also this type of thinking that lead Gainey to trade McDonagh for Gomez.
So let me see if I have this right:
Dubois is apparently eager to join the Montreal Canadiens, and if they trade for him this summer he will sign a 7-year deal at $8.5 million.
For reasons unknown, he will not sign at $8.5 million if he reaches free agency, he will instead get offered $10 million, and that's why Montreal needs to trade for him now.
Why doesn't he just wait until UFA status to get the bigger pay day? Why does he sign this summer if Montreal trades for him?
And conversely, you seem to want to have it both ways: On one hand, Dubios is willing to sign for $8.5 this summer because he might not get $10 million as a free agent and, at the same time, we can't wait for him to reach free agency... because he will get $10 million and "money talks."
You're talking about of both sides of your mouth here.
It sounds like you are only "allegedly" interested in PLD which is fine you don't have to like the player or want him on the team but don't pretend it's gross mismanagement and that he's not worth a guy who might not even be able to crack our NHL roster in training camp.