Disagree with you on this one if we can get PLD but definetly agree that we need 17 either wayNo, we need to pick a prospect with #17 not trade it away..
Bruins tie it up 3-3
Disagree with you on this one if we can get PLD but definetly agree that we need 17 either wayNo, we need to pick a prospect with #17 not trade it away..
Disagree with you on this one if we can get PLD but definetly agree that we need 17 either way
Bruins tie it up 3-3
Imagine, they could have Barzal, Chabot and Connor if they didn’t fu** up in the 2015 draftYou have to draft franchise players. They are very rarely available as free agents or trade.
I mean look at the Bruins. They completely lucked out drafting Pastrnak at the end of the 1st. But the rest of the team is just a bunch of 50 point players, and they broke the points record. I don’t think trading for PLD prevents the Habs from getting a PPG player.
Middle of the road is not a appropriate word for a 24yo physical 60 points center....I've watched him play maybe 10 times, usually in the playoffs, and he has never looked very good to me. Like he's ok, but he doesn't really do very much. I don't see him as an impact player or a player who can drive offense on a line. But these things are always a bit subjective.
But I mean, it's not like he's one of the top players in the league. He's pretty middle-of-the-road. It would be sort of more weird if everyone did want him. It's pretty understandable that not everyone on this board is excited to acquire PLD.
If you wanna define a 6'3 215lb, 65 points PWF C as middle of the road then we will just have to agree to disagree, because that's pretty much the best C we've had in the last 15 years. Are we just only interested in top players of the league now? Like if they aren't PPG+ then just miss me with that? As if beggars like us can really be choosers lolI've watched him play maybe 10 times, usually in the playoffs, and he has never looked very good to me. Like he's ok, but he doesn't really do very much. I don't see him as an impact player or a player who can drive offense on a line. But these things are always a bit subjective.
But I mean, it's not like he's one of the top players in the league. He's pretty middle-of-the-road. It would be sort of more weird if everyone did want him. It's pretty understandable that not everyone on this board is excited to acquire PLD.
I hope you have the same high standards and expectations when it comes to our own players.I've never seen any proposals where it is all that much of a bargain. I guess that's where we're seeing different. If I thought the contract he'd sign for would be a really good team-friendly deal, and the trade to get him would be less than fair market value, then yes I would agree. Sign me up. I just don't see that happening. Most trade proposals and contract terms I see seem like the Habs wouldn't be getting any discount at all. Which is why I'm in no rush.
Middle of the road is not a appropriate word for a 24yo physical 60 points center....
Honestly, you think many teams would say no to having PLD on their roster? Serious question. Not talking about cap situation, just the player and what he brings.
I bet every team would take him as 2nd C/top 6 winger. But since he wants to play here, let's deny him and hope for a generational player to fall on our lap.
87th in the NHL in points. 4th on his team (which was a playoff bubble team). Realistically probably the 5th best player because of Ehlers (although debatable). I think middle-of-the-road is a perfect way to describe PLD. Personally, I prefer Danault, who would have cost way less to sign.If you wanna define a 6'3 215lb, 65 points PWF C as middle of the road then we will just have to agree to disagree, because that's pretty much the best C we've had in the last 15 years. Are we just only interested in top players of the league now? Like if they aren't PPG+ then just miss me with that? As if beggars like us can really be choosers lol
You didn't answer my question. Do you think any team would say no to this guy as second C ? Which one?87th in the NHL in points. 4th on his team (which was a playoff bubble team). Realistically probably the 5th best player because of Ehlers (although debatable). I think middle-of-the-road is a perfect way to describe PLD. Personally, I prefer Danault, who would have cost way less to sign.
But let's agree to disagree. I just totally think it is very normal that some people are not dropping their pants to get PLD - he's not some sort of super stud hockey megastar. He's an average top-6 forward.
We probably should explore trading Suzuki. At 23 years old he's not getting any younger and we are trying to rebuild here, rebuild forever. The team won't be good again for 8 to 12 years minimum, at that point even Slafkovsky will be too old.So by definition, Suzuki is also a middle of the road center.. right? Only 66 points in 82 games... Man why the hell are we rebuilding around such an average player...
trade for PLD
all you that figure that UFA is the way to go, you would take that chance that other teams now are throwing money at him. it will happen history has proven that.
Relying on luck is not the right way to improve a team,you know what is though? astute competent player evaluation and assessment, that's what.Let's not sign PLD so we can be worse and maybe get lucky and get a ... 3OV.
We need to send salary back; thinking Dvorak or Anderson.Are you ready to give up the 17th pick in this year's draft, if we get it?
My offer is: Mesar, Kidney, Harris, and Engstrom. But I think the want a current good young nhl player. May need to do a 3 team deal.
Middle of the road is not a appropriate word for a 24yo physical 60 points center....
Honestly, you think many teams would say no to having PLD on their roster? Serious question. Not talking about cap situation, just the player and what he brings.
I bet every team would take him as 2nd C/top 6 winger. But since he wants to play here, let's deny him and hope for a generational player to fall on our lap.
You seem to have trouble with that fact, but I've been pretty upfront that I don't think super highly of PLD as a player. He's certainly not as good as the other 3 players in front of him in scoring on the Jets, and you obviously don't think highly of Ehlers but I like Ehlers - I've always liked his game.You didn't answer my question. Do you think any team would say no to this guy as second C ? Which one?
You also forget to mention PLD miss 10 games and put 63 points. Saying he's 4th in points on his team and debating Ehlers is better (lol) prove you just don't like the guy.
So by definition, Suzuki is also a middle of the road center.. right? Only 66 points in 82 games... Man why the hell are we rebuilding around such an average player...
To be fair to you, he technically has never reached 65 pts
To be fair to me, I think he does better here! I honestly do
Depending on the line I'd argue it's similar, if he plays with caufield Id argue it's similar to Connor at the very leastHow did you arrive at the conclusion that coming to a worse team with worse line mates will lead to better results?
So by definition, Suzuki is also a middle of the road center.. right? Only 66 points in 82 games... Man why the hell are we rebuilding around such an average player...
Depending on the line I'd argue it's similar, if he plays with caufield Id argue it's similar to Connor at the very least
Starting any trade offer for Dubois starts with Dvorak.
2 reasons. 1) Because if we get PLD, we now have three solid centres (Suzuki, Dach and PLD) and can afford to trade Dvorak. I'd be fine with Evans as our third line centre. I also feel offering a centre in return softens the blow to the Jets.
2) the second reason is salary. Getting rid of Dvorak's contract will be key.
Obviously only Dvorak is not enough, so the 2nd and/or 3rd pieces would probably have to come from the following assets;
Florida 1st, Barron, Engstrom, Norlinder, Beck, Mesar, RHP
If it is Florida 1st, Barron or Beck, that would probably be my final piece.
Otherwise a combination of say Engstrom + Mesar w/ Dvo or RHP + Dvo + Norlinder.
That is how I see this shaking out.
Personally, I am comfortable with Dvo + Florida pick.
You think the Canadiens and Jets are "similar?" talent-wise right now?
Wow. Even if they were similar, how on earth does Dubois then get more points here with "similar" players?
Actually, don't answer that. We can agree to disagree on that one, no need to have any further discussion on my end.
YES i would inlcude the 17 pick, if these fans and me want PLD then let's go get him and form top 2 lines for next year.Are you ready to give up the 17th pick in this year's draft, if we get it?
My offer is: Mesar, Kidney, Harris, and Engstrom. But I think the want a current good young nhl player. May need to do a 3 team deal.
I'm thinking the Jets don't want excess salary like Dvo. But they may want Anderson.We need to send salary back; thinking Dvorak or Anderson.
Unless Anderson gets moved somewhere else for another 1st.