Team finally has a deepening farm team, and finally is tanking during a deep draft year instead of terrible ones and people want to sell the farm for a 65 point player and give him $8m-$9m for it.
Who is saying sell the farm, and where is 9M coming from? There's no way that they give him more than Larkin, and I'd be surprised if it was even over 8.25. Is Anderson/Dvorak, a 17th pick and someone like Harris selling the farm? The entire point of this is because the player could be available for below market price like Trouba. Adding Dubois doesn't change our own 1st either, so what does finally tanking have to do with anything? These two goals are not in opposition.
The problem with your analysis is that you assume that the Habs futures will all be playing with the Habs, and that draft picks and prospects only have value if they play for the organization who drafted them. Teams rebuilding build assets of youth to find great players, but also because youth packages can be used to trade for veteran players the team covets.
Sure, if I had perfect future knowledge and could know that we could land a Dach type deal every year for the next 2-3 seasons I would rather go that route. I just don't think it makes much sense to pass on the already finished product for the hope that in 2-3 years we'll be able to line up a series of better trades for assets when this trade fills a hole at 2C or LW (and by extension RW given it would free up Dach to play with Caufield and Suzuki more often). This guy's available, he's 24, he'll come relatively cheap, I'm not gonna let the perfect be the enemy of the good.
I think this reasoning is also a bit circular because trading for Dubois just makes it even easier to trade youth away in the future if needed. If we add Dubois the idea of trading someone like Beck for a goalie or a great right-shot defender becomes much more attractive as we don't have to worry about a 3C succession plan anymore, and so on.
So should the Habs not trade for PLD now (because they're a terrible team that already has many high contract players it needs to jettison), and wait instead until they have a team ready to actually compete (which my guess is that will be in 2-3 years), at that time they can go and trade for whoever they need at that precise time and use the futures they've accumulated.
We don't actually have all that many big contract players left, particularly if you're placing a 2-3 year timeline on when we can contend. The only players currently signed for 25-26 are Suzuki, Gallagher, Anderson, Matheson, and Dach, and we can assume Caufield as well. Gallagher is on the fast track to LTIR, and one of Anderson or Dvorak would be included in this trade. Most of the other vet bloat will be long gone by then as we currently only have two years left of Dvorak, Armia, and Savard, and just one year left for Hoffman.
Slafkovsky, Guhle, and Harris will be RFAs going into that year alongside potentially our 1st rounder this year if it's Bedard/Fantilli, so it's either not going to be a problem financially or it will be a very good "problem" to have if all of those guys are worth so much money we can't afford them with only Gallagher and Matheson left on the cap sheet as 30+ vet contracts.
Signing PLD to a big contract now is a gamble the Habs don't need to make. They would be placing all their eggs into the PLD basket, when the Habs don't need that basket for another few years. With a huge bucket of youth to trade in a few years, the Habs will have plenty of options to trade for vets that address whatever needs they have at that moment, but roster veterans tied to high value contracts will stifle those options.
I guess I just don't really consider it a gamble given he's coming at a cheaper price than those future hypothetical options. It's possible that in 3 years there's some absolutely perfect fit that we miss out on because of Dubois but I think it's also just as likely that in 3 years we're looking at other players that are in the same basic tier. Also means we avoid a Horvat situation where you add a guy and then he takes time to adjust to the new team etc. To me, the gamble is hoping that our future picks and future trade opportunities give us a better chance than this.
But since you said that you feel that PLD would be a core piece, you are probably fine with that gamble and then absolutely if the Habs brass feel that way, that will be why they make that move. Personally I have never been all that impressed by PLD so for me I would wait and see.
I don't think he's some stud but I think he's a capable top 6 C and would be a great fit either at 2C or on the wing for us. Ultimately I just don't really think the expected value supports holding off for the hope we'll find something even better for cheaper later. We already have Suzuki on what will become a long term value deal, we got Dach for a steal, and we're going to have a ton of ELCs. Not every contract needs to be a steal, and the trade itself is going to heavily favour us.
They’re not trying to accelerate the rebuild. People misunderstand what they’re trying to say. When they talk about acquiring a young player to ‘’accelerate’’ things they mean getting a young 20-21 year old already in the league or close to be still in development like Dach, compared to a 18 years old who’s still at least 2 years away + the development process in the NHL. So the young players we have can mostly be ready at the same time in 3 years. If that makes sense.
It makes sense, but I just don't really buy that Dach 2.0 type trades are the only thing they're looking at, and I think this line of reasoning gets the motivations on Dubois backwards. The Habs aren't head over heels in love with this special unicorn player and desperate to acquire him at any cost. They're interested because he is potentially available for a significant discount on the normal trade cost in the same way Trouba was for the Rangers. The price changes the calculus entirely because it eliminates the opportunity cost in futures that would normally be associated with trading for a player in his prime.
Suzuki, Caufield, PLD and Dach with a few additions will be enough to bring us back to the same mediocre crap we’ve seen since the last 20 or whatever years. If you want to guarantee you’re competing for a wild card spot on a yearly basis, spend stupidly on the Dubois’s of the NHL and ensure you’re never competing with the best of the division, much less the conference/league
"With a few additions" is kinda oversimplifying things. Those few additions include a really deep prospect pool where if only one guy overachieves we're in great shape, and includes a 1st overall, likely 5th overall, and another approx top 10 pick next year too. It's not like we have an empty system beyond what's currently on the roster, nor is this the only move we're going to make. Montreal has nearly 20 million available to spend this summer and not much other than Caufield coming up in the short term.