Wolfy*
Guest
It really is pretty funny. Only a Rangers fan could worry about a player like Kreider with the way he is playing. He's made an impact in practically every single game he has been in.
Thanks to Zucc.
It really is pretty funny. Only a Rangers fan could worry about a player like Kreider with the way he is playing. He's made an impact in practically every single game he has been in.
Right, but if someone told you last year that Chris Kreider would be putting up those numbers close to Barkov and MacKinnon, or hell, even at all (10 in 11) this year, you wouldn't be impressed?
Thanks to Zucc.
I would have been impressed if he 3 in 11, haha.
I think the better argument is the Zucc has been playing better because of Kreider.
Thanks to Zucc.
I think the better argument is the Zucc has been playing better because of Kreider.
I think they've both been very good on their own. Stepan is definitely benefitting from those two, in my opinion.
Mark (NYC)
It seems like Kreider has realized that when he moves his legs he's very difficult to stop.
Katie Strang (3:40 PM)
Right? I talked to an opposing defenseman yesterday, who brought Kreider up unprompted. Said he seems twice as fast as last year. Asked him what he meant and he explained that it wasn't so much Kreider's speed but his confidence and strength in using it.Would be an uphill battle for Kreider, but I think he has a shot at at least earning consideration for the US team if he can sustain this high level of play
Actually isnt ir ironic that zucc only started playing better when he was playing with kreider. Zucc was a healthy scratch and before that did nothing. I know Zucc has done well and is a fan favorite BUT i belive his success really has come with playing with Kreider and stepan.Thanks to Zucc.
Actually isnt ir ironic that zucc only started playing better when he was playing with kreider. Zucc was a healthy scratch and before that did nothing. I know Zucc has done well and is a fan favorite BUT i belive his success really has come with playing with Kreider and stepan.
I also think nash will/should take his place when he is healthy. I know zucc-step-kreids has been our best line BUT nash-step-kreids can be unstoppable and they all have chmeistry with eachotherThis
I also think nash will/should take his place when he is healthy. I know zucc-step-kreids has been our best line BUT nash-step-kreids can be unstoppable and they all have chmeistry with eachother
well the cally-richards-hags line looks set. I know zucc is a fan favorite and has done well but we are talking about a elite talent who has chemistry with both stepan and kreider. its not a knock on zuccarello because he has a done a good job but i think those 2 top lines would be more productiveor you put nash on another line and we essentially have 2 first lines.
well the cally-richards-hags line looks set. I know zucc is a fan favorite and has done well but we are talking about a elite talent who has chemistry with both stepan and kreider. its not a knock on zuccarello because he has a done a good job but i think those 2 top lines would be more productive
well the cally-richards-hags line looks set. I know zucc is a fan favorite and has done well but we are talking about a elite talent who has chemistry with both stepan and kreider. its not a knock on zuccarello because he has a done a good job but i think those 2 top lines would be more productive
Actually im prettty sure i said many times that zucc-stepan-kreider is our best line by a mile. So you are misinterpreting what i said. I simply said that IF brassard doesnt get it together then i dont wnat to waste Nash on a line with a C who isnt contributing. Secondly i dont think kreider needs to play with 2 of teh best rangers in order to be effective. he has proven he can do it. remember he was playing well before the line was created. Also stepan was struggling and zucc was awful befor ethey started playing with kreider"more productive" ?How much production do you want from a single line
But I get it, its really important for you that Kreider plays with the 2 best Rangers forwards
Saying that the cally-richards-hags line looks set, and arguing that the Stepan line could use improvement, sits really really weird with me.
Of the 6 players in the current top6, Callahan is the guy that will contribute most with the third line
That's a nice thought, but there's less than a .000001% chance Kreider goes to Sochi. He'd need to be ridiculous from now until January or better.
Kreider-Stepan-Zuccarello
Hagelin-Richards-Callahan
*****-Brassard-Nash
Boyle-Moore-Dorsett
The 2nd line is working but ideally I like Callahan and Hagelin on separate lines. Hagelin worked well with Nash.
They need another LW. Pouliot isn't the answer.
Kreider-Stepan-Zuccarello
Hagelin-Richards-Callahan
*****-Brassard-Nash
Boyle-Moore-Dorsett/QUOTE]
I don't think Lucai has an out-clause in his contract....