Blue Jays Discussion: It's a bird, it's a plane, it's Kevin Pillar!

Status
Not open for further replies.

Eyedea

The Legend Continues
Jan 29, 2012
27,796
3,645
Toronto, Ontario
using red sox prospect overhype to justify red sox prospect overhype doesn't work.

I'm talking about his actual performance, not overhyping his scouting report. Remember when Brett Lawrie and Matt Moore were in the same conversation as Mike Trout and Bryce Harper?
 

Woodman19

Registered User
Jun 14, 2008
18,567
2,049
My criticism of AA is that he often blew his assets for a big name and was left with little money or resources to round out any depth. He probably wouldn't have signed Happ, but instead trade for a Jaime Garcia type.
 

metafour

Registered User
Apr 6, 2008
1,836
689
AA wasnt perfect but i liked him running the Jays. He was a genius in some areas but needed to work on others. Like a player a GM learns and develops on the job, i believe Dayton Moore was given 9 years before he got the Royals in the playoffs. AA had it harder in the AL East and Rogers failed to see that or have patience but i understand the timeline to hire Shapiro. They made a deal with him in June promising him things that they probably regret when September came around (final say on Baseball decisions) and probably how they treated AA's friend Beeston. They messed up but unfortunately have to move on as he did.

You make a lot of pretty ridiculous assumptions here. Shapiro's arrival had almost nothing to do with Anthopolous, and everything to do with the fact that they needed a long-term replacement for Beeston who was only ever supposed to be a stop-gap replacement for Godfrey, and yet ended up holding the President position for 7 seasons (this was NEVER the plan when they brought him back). The search for Beeston's replacement had begun over a year prior to Shapiro even coming into the picture. The over-blown "issue" on Shapiro having final say in baseball decisions is a convenient story that is supposed to give justified credence to Anthopolous walking out, yet you won't be able to find a single story about Shapiro blocking Chris Antonetti from making any baseball decision in Cleveland. We even know for fact that he let Antonetti make a blockbuster deal to acquire Ubaldo Jimenez despite it being a move that Shapiro himself admitted he wouldn't have made. If you really want to get technical, even Beeston obviously had final say in any significant baseball decision (he was the boss of course), the only difference is that no one even knew WTF he did as President so its assumed that he had no influence at all. Unless you are of the position that Anthopolous deserved to be promoted to President (why?), the addition of Shapiro was a no brainer. You somehow conclude that all of this was a "mistake", how? Anthopolous' team ultimately didn't win and had a hilariously short shelf-life, thus the idea that supposedly he earned authority to pick his own boss is absurd. We hired a more-than-competent President and unfortunately Anthopolous decided to walk out despite the fact that he was ultimately offered an extension and a raise. There is no need to blame others for his own decision that was obviously ego-based.

By the way, pretty much all of this was fueled by local baseball writers who were long-term friends of Beeston and took it upon themselves to shame the team for pushing him out, despite the fact that Beeston was quite obviously a dinosaur in a league that has rapidly evolved to one wherein successful team Presidents are now multi-faceted dynamos with competence in all aspects of the game.
 

zeke

The Dube Abides
Mar 14, 2005
66,937
36,957
AA knew how to fill out the bottom of the roster on the cheap. Colabello, Juan Francisco, Smoak, Hendriks, Redmond, Carrera, Barney, etc.

Depth was never a problem, despite all the "stars and scrubs" criticism.
 

Discoverer

Registered User
Apr 11, 2012
11,257
6,619
AA knew how to fill out the bottom of the roster on the cheap. Colabello, Juan Francisco, Smoak, Hendriks, Redmond, Carrera, Barney, etc.

Depth was never a problem, despite all the "stars and scrubs" criticism.

We know. He's the best at everything.
 

zeke

The Dube Abides
Mar 14, 2005
66,937
36,957
No, it's an actual discussion. You just don't want to talk about it.

It's a fake discussion. If AA had drafted a bunch of good young position guys, and no pitchers, this discussion would be about the importance of drafting pitchers.
 

theaub

34-38-61-10-13-15
Nov 21, 2008
18,886
1,977
Toronto
The last good hitter the Jays developed was...????

Adam Lind? That was over 10 years ago.
 

Discoverer

Registered User
Apr 11, 2012
11,257
6,619
It's a fake discussion. If AA had drafted a bunch of good young position guys, and no pitchers, this discussion would be about the importance of drafting pitchers.

And if that was the case, the lack of developed pitchers would be a legitimate discussion.

The problem here is that you're so defensive of everything AA that you're taking a general discussion about the legitimate strengths and weaknesses of the farm system during his tenure and viewing it as a pro- vs. anti-AA thing.
 

zeke

The Dube Abides
Mar 14, 2005
66,937
36,957
No, the problem here is that people are taking AA's very impressive track record in developing young players and trying to make it look bad by - hilariously - ignoring all pitchers.
 

theaub

34-38-61-10-13-15
Nov 21, 2008
18,886
1,977
Toronto
His ability to draft pitching was very impressive.
His ability to draft position players was nothing short of atrocious.

Thus, he ends up somewhere in the middle.
 

theaub

34-38-61-10-13-15
Nov 21, 2008
18,886
1,977
Toronto
You make a lot of pretty ridiculous assumptions here. Shapiro's arrival had almost nothing to do with Anthopolous,

There's a lot of text below this that frankly I don't care to read, but this is outright wrong. The second they hired Shapiro the writing was bright and clear on the wall for AA, which is why he did what he did. Now based on how the last 3 months of 2015 went, could they have found a way to work together? Sure, but it wasn't the optimal scenario for either person.

Thinking that Shapiro didn't want to bring in his own guy so he could focus moreso on the stadium renovation side of things is nothing short of naive.
 

metafour

Registered User
Apr 6, 2008
1,836
689
There's a lot of text below this that frankly I don't care to read, but this is outright wrong. The second they hired Shapiro the writing was bright and clear on the wall for AA, which is why he did what he did. Now based on how the last 3 months of 2015 went, could they have found a way to work together? Sure, but it wasn't the optimal scenario for either person.

Thinking that Shapiro didn't want to bring in his own guy so he could focus moreso on the stadium renovation side of things is nothing short of naive.

Anthopolous was a well regarded young GM around the league, the idea that Shapiro had full intention of dumping a proven quantity in favor of an unproven "own guy" is pure hypothesis at best. Yes, new President's tend to end up relieving the sitting GM in favor of their own choice. However, new President's are typically brought in on badly losing teams in which the GM was clearly toast either way, which wasn't the case at all when Shapiro came on, as the product on the field clearly had several things going for it and the team was very competitive.

Mark Shapiro is a smart guy. If Anthopolous is as bulletproof as a lot of you believe, I don't buy for one second that his fate was already sealed. Shapiro promoted Anthopolous' right hand man and pretty much kept every other high ranking member of AA's staff in place: Tinnish, Sheehan, Dana Brown, Perry Minasian. So what are you suggesting, that he liked all of those guys but was dead set on removing Anthopolous "just because"? I don't buy it.
 

Discoverer

Registered User
Apr 11, 2012
11,257
6,619
No, the problem here is that people are taking AA's very impressive track record in developing young players and trying to make it look bad by - hilariously - ignoring all pitchers.

Or people are acknowledging that he has weaknesses.

If I say "Jose Bautista is a poor defender," would you jump to his defense because he's a great hitter?
 

TootooTrain

Sandpaper
Jun 12, 2010
35,517
477
AA was an awful GM

So glad he left
Crippled our farm system for a run in the playoffs

Living through the recent playoff rounds has been great fun as a fan. It's too bad there aren't alot of position players coming up through the ranks. I'd describe it as unfortunate, rather than being an awful situation.
 

Jozay

Registered User
Jul 9, 2012
14,809
10,800
Toronto
The only players I don't want to lose are Donaldson first and foremost, then Sanchez, Stroman and Osuna. Anyone else can go.

I'm scared Donaldson gets traded though.

I think Donaldson should be traded if the team is out of it by July.

I dont think management wants to commit 5 years, 150+ million to him anyways.
 

Suntouchable13

Registered User
Dec 20, 2003
44,587
20,801
Toronto, ON
I prefer sustained success

AA decides to cripple the farm system and then bolt from the organization to make himself look like a hero for 2 playoff runs

I can't wait to hear what kind of sustained success were they on the verge of? *Hint* they weren't. People have been saying what you have been saying for literally 2 decades.
 

Discoverer

Registered User
Apr 11, 2012
11,257
6,619
I prefer sustained success

AA decides to cripple the farm system and then bolt from the organization to make himself look like a hero for 2 playoff runs

Between you and Zeke, we're getting both ends of the Ridiculous AA Opinions spectrum.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad