Where I think everyone goes wrong with the "Caps only exist to get Ovi the record" narrative is that the best way to get Ovi the record is for the team to be good and the best way for the team to be good is for Ovi to score (and thus hit the record).
Whereas I think the first part is more of an "honest" mistake, what really drives me insane about the way the franchise is talked about is that the FO has gone about this mission in an incredibly rational, sustainable way despite a real dramatic fall off from most of the cup-winning core.
They've had exceptional pro scouting, hitting on a lot of older UFA additions such as Strome, TVR, Dowd, Hathaway and more importantly not having any real big misses. Their drafting and development has been extremely good as well -- Fehervary, McMichael, Lapierre, Malenstyn and Protas have all played important minutes for them. Finally, they've taken a few calculated risks but importantly haven't given up a ton to do so. Bringing in three flawed but good and younger players in PLD, Chychrun, and Sandin cost them Jensen, Kuemper, a 3rd, and 30oa. To do all this while having $22M in cap tied up in two guys that couldn't skate anymore in Oshie and Backstrom and one in Kuznetsov who just completely gave up on being a professional hockey player is pretty impressive.
Compare that to a certain rival in a similar spot and it's infuriating that they've gotten the "hard" part of having Malkin/Crosby/Guentzel hang on for longer but have done basically the exact opposite of the Caps in every other aspect of roster-building. Their pro scouting has been horrendous (Graves, Gryzlyck, Smith, Jarry), their drafting has been even worse, and the one big calculated risk they did take involved bringing back a 33yo instead of a 26yo.
Only one GM though "has been handed a really tough situation" while the other is "delaying the inevitable"