Interesting. So you think that Ovi breaking a record without context means something but Greyzky’s record itself doesn’t?
Do you think they were better or worse than ovechkin? Do you think he was afforded the same opportunities or not? Otherwise your comment is irrelevant.
I think he was afforded other opportunities which made it easier. I think the fact that scores were much higher made it easier for goal scorers to score. So if his points weren’t artificially raised the way you are suggesting Ovi’s are, they were still raised by the lack of d.
I think ovi’s scoring needs context, but so does Gretzky’s and since there is no asterisk’s breaking down what was going on in the nhl at the time and all we are left with is a number that historically it won’t matter the context. It doesn’t mean the context doesn’t matter, but, that in the end all you have is a number. Not a number broken into empty net goals etc.
Therefore offsetting opportunities. Gretzky is still better as it’s not his only record. Gretzky also has the assists record. Which once again needs to be contextualized, higher scoring nhl, but, no one else has come close enough that they could create an opportunity for a modern player to break it.
I thought your initial post only looked at one advantage instead of the many they both had and weighed them against each other, by pointing at the one advantage meaningless games team try to feed him the record as the only one.