Is Sanheim a Top Paring D?

Is Sanheim a Top Paring D?


  • Total voters
    119

Ghosts Beer

I saw Goody Fletcher with the Devil!
Feb 10, 2014
22,754
16,517
Where are we at on this?

At first Chuck was a moron for signing Sanheim to a bridge instead of a big long-term deal.

Then Chuck was a moron for extending Sanheim to a big long-term deal.

Now.... we're at Sanheim is a stud first-pairing defenseman? So I guess the long-term contract is a good thing?

I can't keep up with the roller coaster.
 

Cody Webster

Registered User
Jul 18, 2014
26,201
24,682
Where are we at on this?

At first Chuck was a moron for signing Sanheim to a bridge instead of a big long-term deal.

Then Chuck was a moron for extending Sanheim to a big long-term deal.

Now.... we're at Sanheim is a stud first-pairing defenseman? So I guess the long-term contract is a good thing?

I can't keep up with the roller coaster.
I'm pretty sure the only people that didn't believe in Sanheim were you, your cronies, and the shills of Flyers Twitter, but that's just a guess

As I said in the other thread, any person from the front office that was involved in the nixed deal of Sanheim for Krug should be fired on the spot
 

Rebels57

HFBoards Sponsor
Sponsor
Sep 28, 2014
78,066
125,450
I'm pretty sure the only people that didn't believe in Sanheim were you, your cronies, and the shills of Flyers Twitter, but that's just a guess

As I said in the other thread, any person from the front office that was involved in the nixed deal of Sanheim for Krug should be fired on the spot

That trade was all about Torts for sure. He views Sanheim as just another Soy Boy like Frost. Maybe his tune has changed this season but he definitely wanted him gone over the summer.

Starting this season with hostage and his 2 burners on Igor Silent was the most genius decision. All I see is people reacting to some obvious nonsense, however, invisible.

Imagine how cool this place would be if everyone followed our lead? Im all for healthy debate, but this shit with those attention-whores has been incredibly unhealthy for years.
 

bennysflyers16

Registered User
Jan 26, 2004
85,783
64,038
I'm pretty sure the only people that didn't believe in Sanheim were you, your cronies, and the shills of Flyers Twitter, but that's just a guess

As I said in the other thread, any person from the front office that was involved in the nixed deal of Sanheim for Krug should be fired on the spot
Pretty sure this is bang on.

You and your cronies , love the use of the word cronie, I use it all the time lol
 

Ghosts Beer

I saw Goody Fletcher with the Devil!
Feb 10, 2014
22,754
16,517
I'm pretty sure the only people that didn't believe in Sanheim were you, your cronies, and the shills of Flyers Twitter, but that's just a guess

As I said in the other thread, any person from the front office that was involved in the nixed deal of Sanheim for Krug should be fired on the spot
I actually supported the Sanheim extension when it happened.

And even though I criticized Sanheim's huge dropoff in play last season, I held firm that the contract was not "unmovable" like so many fans claimed and I said that I thought Sanheim would rebound and that ultimately it would prove to be a fine contract.

So I'm not sure what you're talking about.
 

wankstifier

All glory to the harvest god
Jun 19, 2018
7,977
11,399
That trade was all about Torts for sure. He views Sanheim as just another Soy Boy like Frost. Maybe his tune has changed this season but he definitely wanted him gone over the summer.



Imagine how cool this place would be if everyone followed our lead? Im all for healthy debate, but this shit with those attention-whores has been incredibly unhealthy for years.
I finally gave in when I realized I'd been reading the same conversations for like 3 years. I can guess from reading one side that some people are saying the same bull shit. It's been at least 6 years, or two rebuilds.
 

Beef Invictus

Revolutionary Positivity
Dec 21, 2009
130,141
170,468
Armored Train
Where are we at on this?

At first Chuck was a moron for signing Sanheim to a bridge instead of a big long-term deal.

Then Chuck was a moron for extending Sanheim to a big long-term deal.

Now.... we're at Sanheim is a stud first-pairing defenseman? So I guess the long-term contract is a good thing?

I can't keep up with the roller coaster.

You don't get to say a thing with all your embarrassing Sanhero garbage. Have an ounce of awareness.

And what the f*** is this, a defense of Chuck Fletcher? The worst GM in team history by miles?
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad