HuGort
Registered User
Would Calgary throw their season to save their first pick? Could come down to that. They about a .500 team. Draft about 13-15.
Troll post? Calgary had like .960 goaltending in the first 6 games. That was completely unsustainable and the games vs Vegas and Utah proved it. They are also only 2 points above the team currently ranked 10th last, and only 3 above the team ranked 7th last. Come back in February and we can discuss then.Would Calgary throw their season to save their first pick? Could come down to that. They about a .500 team. Draft about 13-15.
After 6 games the combined Save% of Wolf and Vladar was nowhere near .960, it was .918. But even that is unsustainable with the defense in front of them.Troll post? Calgary had like .960 goaltending in the first 6 games. That was completely unsustainable and the games vs Vegas and Utah proved it. They are also only 2 points above the team currently ranked 10th last, and only 3 above the team ranked 7th last. Come back in February and we can discuss then.
Habs fans getting pretty excited at the possibilities, hey?Would Calgary throw their season to save their first pick? Could come down to that. They about a .500 team. Draft about 13-15.
The 12th pick is a lot better than 32ndHabs fans getting pretty excited at the possibilities, hey?
You don't say....The 12th pick is a lot better than 32nd
I don't understand why people think our defense is so bad.After 6 games the combined Save% of Wolf and Vladar was nowhere near .960, it was .918. But even that is unsustainable with the defense in front of them.
What was also unsustainable was them scoring nearly 4 goals per game, for a team that should be middle of the pack in scoring.
The Flames also had a pretty lucky/weak sked to start the season. The Canucks were without Demko, and while Silovs has potential, he's not NHL ready IMO. Philly (G2), Chicago (G4), Seattle (G5) and Pittsburgh (G6) aren't exactly the class of the NHL , I expect all of them to miss the playoffs. Then there was the Oilers who simply hadn't started scoring yet and Skinner/Pickard had a SV% under .800
After that, things got much harder with Carolina, Winnipeg and Vegas, who are my pre-season picks to win their divisions. Then Seattle and New Jersey, both of whom should be bubble teams. Frankly I wouldn't be shocked if we went .400 or lower the rest of the way.
Flames have decent team. Better than last year. Good defense with solid veterans up front.You don't say....
I don't see CGY finishing .500. Likely very close to the same as lastyear, and hopefully before Montreal.
6th-9th, enough to really tease Habs fans.
Flames have decent team. Better than last year. Good defense with solid veterans up front.
Agreed. Right handed 3rd line center. He looks good.I feel like Cody Glass for a 3rd makes a lot of sense.
After 6 games the combined Save% of Wolf and Vladar was nowhere near .960, it was .918. But even that is unsustainable with the defense in front of them.
What was also unsustainable was them scoring nearly 4 goals per game, for a team that should be middle of the pack in scoring.
The Flames also had a pretty lucky/weak sked to start the season. The Canucks were without Demko, and while Silovs has potential, he's not NHL ready IMO. Philly (G2), Chicago (G4), Seattle (G5) and Pittsburgh (G6) aren't exactly the class of the NHL , I expect all of them to miss the playoffs. Then there was the Oilers who simply hadn't started scoring yet and Skinner/Pickard had a SV% under .800
After that, things got much harder with Carolina, Winnipeg and Vegas, who are my pre-season picks to win their divisions. Then Seattle and New Jersey, both of whom should be bubble teams. Frankly I wouldn't be shocked if we went .400 or lower the rest of the way.
It’s funny. I think Habs fans are more invested in this Flames season than Flames fans are.
The reality is the Flames are built to lose. And they are beginning to achieve that goal. It’s only likely to get worse.