KyleDubasBoyGeniua
Registered User
- Nov 20, 2020
- 728
- 410
No one said he was. the issue is he would be more of a problem with a larger role.Our fourth line played better than our third line clifford wasn't the problem
No one said he was. the issue is he would be more of a problem with a larger role.Our fourth line played better than our third line clifford wasn't the problem
That's not true at all. There is way more that impacts a series other than coaching...The coach that "outcoaches" another coach is the winner of a game or a series.
"Laid an egg" is egregious and, quite frankly, incorrect. Game 1 was a 50/50 toss up. The Leafs' skaters were much better than Columbus in Game 5, as they were in most of the series.
No matter how you split it up, even with our cold offense, we should have won 3/5 of those games (Game 2, 3, and 5), and we could have easily won Game 1 as well.
Tortorella did not outcoach Keefe at all. He just had a lot of things go his way, and barely squeaked through a series against us.
I didn't say Torts outcoached Keefe, I said Keefe didn't prepare, and have the team execute, a game plan to counteract CBJ's tactics.
Hell, one of their $11M players admitted to not being engaged in Game 1 and they were extremely lucky there even was a Game 5.
"we should have won 3/5 of those games" - yea, where have I heard that before?
The Leafs took it to Columbus better than most teams did all year, when you look at how Columbus kept teams out all year they were way less effective there against the Leafs.
This is how well Columbus kept out teams during the regular season
View attachment 378050
This is where the Leafs were able to penetrate during the series
View attachment 378051
They broke through so I'd say Keefe had them playing right; but again I don't know how many times it needs to be stated, Andersen needed to stop those low danger shots. You simply cannot give one of the best teams in the league soft goals.
I assume he meant to say defensive teams. Columbus was the best defensive team in the league last year, and we actually broke through that very well in the playoff series to generate opportunities.I posted (and you can look it up) that CBJ would be a tough matchup but to call them one of the best teams in the league is a stretch IMO.
I think Keefe is fine.
Now, if he becomes our new Paul Maurice and somehow never goes away (I'm talking Jets here) despite how meh he might turn out, then I will say differently.
I have no objections about him yet.
The Leafs took it to Columbus better than most teams did all year, when you look at how Columbus kept teams out all year they were way less effective there against the Leafs.
This is how well Columbus kept out teams during the regular season
View attachment 378050
This is where the Leafs were able to penetrate during the series
View attachment 378051
They broke through so I'd say Keefe had them playing right; but again I don't know how many times it needs to be stated, Andersen needed to stop those low danger shots. You simply cannot give one of the best teams in the league soft goals.
CBJ ?? Really?? Once they announced the Leafs would be playing CBJ in the "play-ins" many posters thought Leafs would easily roll them. I posted (and you can look it up) that CBJ would be a tough matchup but to call them one of the best teams in the league is a stretch IMO.
My thoughts exactly. I just don't think we have anywhere near enough data on him to judge properly yet.
This post was perfect until the last sentence. One of the best teams in the league??? Come on.
Cool...they can raise the 2020 Heat Map and the XGF banners together once fans are back in the seats.The Leafs took it to Columbus better than most teams did all year, when you look at how Columbus kept teams out all year they were way less effective there against the Leafs.
This is how well Columbus kept out teams during the regular season
View attachment 378050
This is where the Leafs were able to penetrate during the series
View attachment 378051
They broke through so I'd say Keefe had them playing right; but again I don't know how many times it needs to be stated, Andersen needed to stop those low danger shots. You simply cannot give one of the best teams in the league soft goals.
Cool...they can raise the 2020 Heat Map and the XGF banners together once fans are back in the seats.
Cool...they can raise the 2020 Heat Map and the XGF banners together once fans are back in the seats.
If you don't understand them, it's okay to say so.
I know it takes a level of critical thinking that hockey fans aren't used to.
And all the teams that "won rounds" instead of the Leafs can hold parades.Cool...they can raise the 2020 Heat Map and the XGF banners together once fans are back in the seats.
Well if they won 2, I suppose they could celebrate being Divisional Champs rather than celebrating Heat Maps and X stats.And all the teams that "won rounds" instead of the Leafs can hold parades.
If taking refuge in useless blog stats takes the pain away of losing to the Columbus Blue Jackets in a play-in series to qualify for the playoffs, I say let them have it.
There hasn't been much to celebrate with the Leafs these days so let's celebrate how they were "expected" to win, all thanks to the fine folks at naturalstattrick.com.
Like Bomber said.....if it takes the pain away of losing to the Columbus Blue Jackets in a play-in series to qualify for the playoffs, enjoy your rationalizations.
Truth be told, I expected them to win as well........until Game 3 at least.
I think so, who knew winning a first round series is viewed as like winning the cup.Well if they won 2, I suppose they could celebrate being Divisional Champs rather than celebrating Heat Maps and X stats.
With context comes more accurate insight, to draw more accurate conclusions, which allows for better and more impactful solutions to address areas of concern, which leads to successful teams and a higher chance of winning the cup. I'm not really sure what arbitrarily claiming that everything sucks because we didn't win gets anybody.Oh so you don't care about the Leafs winning and only care about the "context"
The Leafs occasionally set up a super-line last year and did so in the playoffs as well. Here are the stats when Auston Matthews and John Tavaers played together last season: 58% puck possession, 61% of the shots, and an absolutely ridiculous 64% expected-goals. (All stats naturalstattrick.com).
Even crazier, they outscored the opposition 8-1 in just under 90 minutes, which is 89% of the total goals. You can’t ignore domination like that. With the deep roster the Leafs have, it would be foolish not to do it.
The Leafs took it to Columbus better than most teams did all year, when you look at how Columbus kept teams out all year they were way less effective there against the Leafs.
This is how well Columbus kept out teams during the regular season
View attachment 378050
This is where the Leafs were able to penetrate during the series
View attachment 378051
They broke through so I'd say Keefe had them playing right; but again I don't know how many times it needs to be stated, Andersen needed to stop those low danger shots. You simply cannot give one of the best teams in the league soft goals.
so why did Dubas keep Anderson but turn over so much of the roster if the problem was ''shockingly poor goaltending'' ?So many bad narratives around this team coming out of last season. Fact of the matter: Keene came into a dysfunctional locker room as the new coach of a struggling team and led the team to a 100+ point pace (pro-rated) - all the while getting atrocious goaltending and riding a brutal PDO. Inconsistency and leadership are still definitely question marks with this team, but the majority of problems we saw after the coaching change were a product of shocking levels of poor goaltending for over half the season.