is it just me or is Necas going to explode this year?

AhosDatsyukian

Registered User
Sep 25, 2020
11,240
32,745
If anyone was wondering if Connor Bedard was worth all the hype, here’s your answer.
I mean, sure but also don't downplay Turbo's abilities. He was a 70-80+ point guy multiple seasons here, despite our system limiting forward's scoring upsides. Chicago, Bedard or not, does not have a system that holds forwards back like ours. And despite the pace, he's not hitting 130 points lol
 
  • Like
Reactions: WreckingCrew

Svechhammer

THIS is hockey?
Jun 8, 2017
25,114
91,520
I mean, sure but also don't downplay Turbo's abilities. He was a 70-80+ point guy multiple seasons here, despite our system limiting forward's scoring upsides. Chicago, Bedard or not, does not have a system that holds forwards back like ours. And despite the pace, he's not hitting 130 points lol
Turbo is a great setup player, and as much as we justifiably love Aho, Bedard is simply a better player, so its not surprising that Turbo is seeing great results when his high level passes are finding the stick of an elite scorer. He's a perfect fit for that line, and he will do well there.

Doesn't change the fact that he had shown through his own play that he wasn't a good fit here anymore.
 

Derailed75

Registered User
Jan 5, 2021
5,188
12,464
Danville
Turbo is a great setup player, and as much as we justifiably love Aho, Bedard is simply a better player,
WTF are you talking about?

Does Bedard have the potential and pedigree to be better than Aho absolutely. Is he simply a better player? Absolutely not he has had one 60 point season, I think we would all bet on him being a better player in the future but now, no and it's not even close
 

Discipline Daddy

Brentcent Van Burns
Sponsor
Nov 27, 2009
2,755
7,440
Raleigh, NC
Back to Necas.

I was of the opinion that we should trade Necas after last year. I do think we would have a better team for the next 5 years if we gave Guentzel $8.5Mx8 (assuming he would have stayed with more money, which we don't know) and traded Necas.

I have to imagine the Borg did their due diligence and did look to trade Necas, but the deals weren't there. I'm positive Necas would look better in another system, but I think we've had enough sample size to know who he is as a player. We've seen him to score 72 points here and he can do it again. That is definitely worth $6.5M. We don't have better options than him on PP1 and I think that unit will eventually have good chemistry and score a lot of points.

I don't love his game for the playoffs, in general, but we have seen him be a man possessed for a game here and there. His play last postseason left me frustrated at times, but 9 points in 11 games isn't bad, and I thought he was overall more impactful than Jake Guentzel.

I also think it's likely he walks after 2 years, but 2 years from now is an eternity by NHL standards.
 

WreckingCrew

Registered User
Feb 4, 2015
13,224
40,430
I mean, sure but also don't downplay Turbo's abilities. He was a 70-80+ point guy multiple seasons here, despite our system limiting forward's scoring upsides. Chicago, Bedard or not, does not have a system that holds forwards back like ours. And despite the pace, he's not hitting 130 points lol
I mean the evidence is clear, Aho hasn't gotten a single regular-season point since Turbo left, and the team only has 1 goal...Turbo has 3x as many goals alone as our WHOLE TEAM does!
 

Blueline Bomber

AI Generated Minnesota Wild
Sponsor
Oct 31, 2007
40,309
45,915
Back to Necas.

I was of the opinion that we should trade Necas after last year. I do think we would have a better team for the next 5 years if we gave Guentzel $8.5Mx8 (assuming he would have stayed with more money, which we don't know) and traded Necas.

I have to imagine the Borg did their due diligence and did look to trade Necas, but the deals weren't there. I'm positive Necas would look better in another system, but I think we've had enough sample size to know who he is as a player. We've seen him to score 72 points here and he can do it again. That is definitely worth $6.5M. We don't have better options than him on PP1 and I think that unit will eventually have good chemistry and score a lot of points.

I don't love his game for the playoffs, in general, but we have seen him be a man possessed for a game here and there. His play last postseason left me frustrated at times, but 9 points in 11 games isn't bad, and I thought he was overall more impactful than Jake Guentzel.

I also think it's likely he walks after 2 years, but 2 years from now is an eternity by NHL standards.

To be fair, we did try to trade Necas, and apparently had a few deals lined up, but the deals we set up required Necas to sign an extension with the team we were trading him to. And Necas wasn't willing to do that.

So we essentially kicked the ball down the road until this off-season, where I'm sure we'll try again. Hell, depending on how the season goes, it may even be a deadline deal.
 
  • Like
Reactions: WreckingCrew

Discipline Daddy

Brentcent Van Burns
Sponsor
Nov 27, 2009
2,755
7,440
Raleigh, NC
To be fair, we did try to trade Necas, and apparently had a few deals lined up, but the deals we set up required Necas to sign an extension with the team we were trading him to. And Necas wasn't willing to do that.

So we essentially kicked the ball down the road until this off-season, where I'm sure we'll try again. Hell, depending on how the season goes, it may even be a deadline deal.
Yeah. I got the same sense as well though I'm just an outsider speculating. It seemed obvious to me that Guentz would be better on this year's team than Necas, plus you get an asset from trading Necas. Alas. The silver lining is not re-signing Guentzel means you don't get saddled with dead cap for the last few years. And silver lining is that in the playoffs all in all Necas was debatably a better player than Guentzel was and had much worse linemates.

I'd be fine moving on from Necas if we do get good value, but that seems less and less likely. Better to hope he finds good chemistry and boosts our powerplay and we live with the warts in his game.
 

tarheelhockey

Offside Review Specialist
Feb 12, 2010
86,284
142,743
Bojangles Parking Lot
Turbo is a great setup player, and as much as we justifiably love Aho, Bedard is simply a better player, so its not surprising that Turbo is seeing great results when his high level passes are finding the stick of an elite scorer.

Honestly, if we go back and watch the actual replays of his points so far, it’s not even that complicated. Two were off a world-class play by Bedard, one was a fluke bounce off an Oiler, and one he passed the puck away and had nothing to do with the scoring play.

He did have a nice slap shot goal, but this is more Bedard and early season puck luck than anything he’s directly contributing.
 

The Faulker 27

Registered User
Nov 15, 2011
13,103
48,292
Sauna-Aho
Honestly, there's no way to quantify a difference in his production without more games under his belt. Turbo was also a streaky player. He'd have flashes of brilliance then nothing for multiple games in a row. How many times did we say he should be shooting the puck more than passing. He has an elite shot when he uses it. OR maybe that was Tripp always saying that. Either way.
 

MinJaBen

Canes Sharks Boy
Sponsor
Dec 14, 2015
21,264
82,433
Durm
Honestly, if we go back and watch the actual replays of his points so far, it’s not even that complicated. Two were off a world-class play by Bedard, one was a fluke bounce off an Oiler, and one he passed the puck away and had nothing to do with the scoring play.

He did have a nice slap shot goal, but this is more Bedard and early season puck luck than anything he’s directly contributing.

I mean, who is this team to turn their noses up at some puck luck?
 
  • Haha
Reactions: WreckingCrew

chaz4hockey

Old man but still a PP2 Candidate
Sponsor
Jan 21, 2021
8,053
17,055
Naples, FL
Are we going to act like TT didn't have similar success here? The problem wasn't that he couldn't put up points while attached to the best player on the respective team. It was that, if he wasn't attached to Aho, his production disappeared.

So if we wanted to have a successful line like the Jarvis - Aho - Guentzel one, that would put TT on our 2nd line, where he was essentially a non-factor.

Now maybe that doesn't happen in Chicago, but I'd wait until he doesn't have Bedard on his wing before complaining about his stifled production here
I'd add, he had only 2 out of 6 successful playoffs (19 & 22), lacked needed size/physicality, is now 30 and has been suggested wasn't a big workout kind of guy (which is key for RBA and an area that is even more important as you age).

We do miss his once-ice sophistication, PK work and the fact that was a jack of all trades line of guy (hopefully his productivity is picked up by JR).

I'd also suggest that often a player gets a new impetus to perform once they are a placed in a new situation and then they continue succesfully or over time fall back into the same old/less successful habits.

I wish him and most of our recent guys who have travelled away; ie Noesen, Pesce (damn autocorrect keeps on changing his name), Nino and even Guentzel well (not Dougie though.....something about how he left bothered me)
 
  • Like
Reactions: WreckingCrew

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad