is it just me or is Necas going to explode this year?

AhosDatsyukian

Registered User
Sep 25, 2020
11,240
32,745
If anyone was wondering if Connor Bedard was worth all the hype, here’s your answer.
I mean, sure but also don't downplay Turbo's abilities. He was a 70-80+ point guy multiple seasons here, despite our system limiting forward's scoring upsides. Chicago, Bedard or not, does not have a system that holds forwards back like ours. And despite the pace, he's not hitting 130 points lol
 
  • Like
Reactions: WreckingCrew

Svechhammer

THIS is hockey?
Jun 8, 2017
25,114
91,516
I mean, sure but also don't downplay Turbo's abilities. He was a 70-80+ point guy multiple seasons here, despite our system limiting forward's scoring upsides. Chicago, Bedard or not, does not have a system that holds forwards back like ours. And despite the pace, he's not hitting 130 points lol
Turbo is a great setup player, and as much as we justifiably love Aho, Bedard is simply a better player, so its not surprising that Turbo is seeing great results when his high level passes are finding the stick of an elite scorer. He's a perfect fit for that line, and he will do well there.

Doesn't change the fact that he had shown through his own play that he wasn't a good fit here anymore.
 

Derailed75

Registered User
Jan 5, 2021
5,188
12,463
Danville
Turbo is a great setup player, and as much as we justifiably love Aho, Bedard is simply a better player,
WTF are you talking about?

Does Bedard have the potential and pedigree to be better than Aho absolutely. Is he simply a better player? Absolutely not he has had one 60 point season, I think we would all bet on him being a better player in the future but now, no and it's not even close
 

Discipline Daddy

Brentcent Van Burns
Sponsor
Nov 27, 2009
2,755
7,439
Raleigh, NC
Back to Necas.

I was of the opinion that we should trade Necas after last year. I do think we would have a better team for the next 5 years if we gave Guentzel $8.5Mx8 (assuming he would have stayed with more money, which we don't know) and traded Necas.

I have to imagine the Borg did their due diligence and did look to trade Necas, but the deals weren't there. I'm positive Necas would look better in another system, but I think we've had enough sample size to know who he is as a player. We've seen him to score 72 points here and he can do it again. That is definitely worth $6.5M. We don't have better options than him on PP1 and I think that unit will eventually have good chemistry and score a lot of points.

I don't love his game for the playoffs, in general, but we have seen him be a man possessed for a game here and there. His play last postseason left me frustrated at times, but 9 points in 11 games isn't bad, and I thought he was overall more impactful than Jake Guentzel.

I also think it's likely he walks after 2 years, but 2 years from now is an eternity by NHL standards.
 

WreckingCrew

Registered User
Feb 4, 2015
13,222
40,429
I mean, sure but also don't downplay Turbo's abilities. He was a 70-80+ point guy multiple seasons here, despite our system limiting forward's scoring upsides. Chicago, Bedard or not, does not have a system that holds forwards back like ours. And despite the pace, he's not hitting 130 points lol
I mean the evidence is clear, Aho hasn't gotten a single regular-season point since Turbo left, and the team only has 1 goal...Turbo has 3x as many goals alone as our WHOLE TEAM does!
 

Blueline Bomber

AI Generated Minnesota Wild
Sponsor
Oct 31, 2007
40,308
45,911
Back to Necas.

I was of the opinion that we should trade Necas after last year. I do think we would have a better team for the next 5 years if we gave Guentzel $8.5Mx8 (assuming he would have stayed with more money, which we don't know) and traded Necas.

I have to imagine the Borg did their due diligence and did look to trade Necas, but the deals weren't there. I'm positive Necas would look better in another system, but I think we've had enough sample size to know who he is as a player. We've seen him to score 72 points here and he can do it again. That is definitely worth $6.5M. We don't have better options than him on PP1 and I think that unit will eventually have good chemistry and score a lot of points.

I don't love his game for the playoffs, in general, but we have seen him be a man possessed for a game here and there. His play last postseason left me frustrated at times, but 9 points in 11 games isn't bad, and I thought he was overall more impactful than Jake Guentzel.

I also think it's likely he walks after 2 years, but 2 years from now is an eternity by NHL standards.

To be fair, we did try to trade Necas, and apparently had a few deals lined up, but the deals we set up required Necas to sign an extension with the team we were trading him to. And Necas wasn't willing to do that.

So we essentially kicked the ball down the road until this off-season, where I'm sure we'll try again. Hell, depending on how the season goes, it may even be a deadline deal.
 
  • Like
Reactions: WreckingCrew

Discipline Daddy

Brentcent Van Burns
Sponsor
Nov 27, 2009
2,755
7,439
Raleigh, NC
To be fair, we did try to trade Necas, and apparently had a few deals lined up, but the deals we set up required Necas to sign an extension with the team we were trading him to. And Necas wasn't willing to do that.

So we essentially kicked the ball down the road until this off-season, where I'm sure we'll try again. Hell, depending on how the season goes, it may even be a deadline deal.
Yeah. I got the same sense as well though I'm just an outsider speculating. It seemed obvious to me that Guentz would be better on this year's team than Necas, plus you get an asset from trading Necas. Alas. The silver lining is not re-signing Guentzel means you don't get saddled with dead cap for the last few years. And silver lining is that in the playoffs all in all Necas was debatably a better player than Guentzel was and had much worse linemates.

I'd be fine moving on from Necas if we do get good value, but that seems less and less likely. Better to hope he finds good chemistry and boosts our powerplay and we live with the warts in his game.
 

tarheelhockey

Offside Review Specialist
Feb 12, 2010
86,284
142,732
Bojangles Parking Lot
Turbo is a great setup player, and as much as we justifiably love Aho, Bedard is simply a better player, so its not surprising that Turbo is seeing great results when his high level passes are finding the stick of an elite scorer.

Honestly, if we go back and watch the actual replays of his points so far, it’s not even that complicated. Two were off a world-class play by Bedard, one was a fluke bounce off an Oiler, and one he passed the puck away and had nothing to do with the scoring play.

He did have a nice slap shot goal, but this is more Bedard and early season puck luck than anything he’s directly contributing.
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad