Injury Report: Injury Summary

Status
Not open for further replies.

Mayor Bee

Registered User
Dec 29, 2008
18,087
535
I don't know anything about knees but if there's no structural damage, why isn't he playing?

Doesnt make sense to me. A strain isn't a week to week thing in my uneducated opinion.

It depends on who's doing the talking and who's doing the reporting. It's unlikely that a reporter is talking directly to a doctor, meaning that there's someone else who's passing along the info. That could get botched. Or it could be that to whoever's in that communication chain, "structural" refers to bone and cartilage, and that connective tissue would be grouped as "soft tissue".

It could be a lot of things. Maybe a flareup of the knee in the preseason led to time off of skates and out of the gym for lower body purposes, and getting back on skates exposed a muscular weakness as a result of the time out. The muscle inflames, it impinges a nerve, and suddenly that's another few days out.

In other words, it could be a lot of things.
 

BluejacketNut

Registered User
Sep 23, 2006
6,275
211
www.erazzphoto.com
Considering the FO Cold War secrecy now, I have no reason to believe anything they say. I understand the upper/lower body injury details to not show your cards, but anything they really say I just dont trust anymore. When they said Bob would miss 1-2 weeks, was that the actual estimate by our doctors (if so we're in BIG trouble with those guys) or are they just being secretive? There's really no reason to put up a smoke screen on the injuries, all it does is make you not believe anything they have to say because you dont know when theyre telling the truth or not. Murray out for almost 2 months for a sprain?
 

Viqsi

"that chick from Ohio"
Oct 5, 2007
55,777
35,417
40N 83W (approx)
Considering the FO Cold War secrecy now, I have no reason to believe anything they say. I understand the upper/lower body injury details to not show your cards, but anything they really say I just dont trust anymore. When they said Bob would miss 1-2 weeks, was that the actual estimate by our doctors (if so we're in BIG trouble with those guys) or are they just being secretive? There's really no reason to put up a smoke screen on the injuries, all it does is make you not believe anything they have to say because you dont know when theyre telling the truth or not. Murray out for almost 2 months for a sprain?
Perhaps they consider the actual target audience to be the opposition. "Their guy could be back any day now, so we need to gameplan for his presence." I imagine Richards and the roster are kept a little better informed.
 

Fro

Cheatin on CBJ w TBL
Mar 11, 2009
25,316
4,994
The Beach, FL
NHL Blue Jackets ‏@BlueJacketsNHL 1m1 minute ago
Good news: @Anisimov42 has shed the "no contact" jersey and Sergei Bobrovsky is on the ice for practice this morning. #CBJ
 

MFRONE

Registered User
Feb 3, 2005
12,990
1,588
Columbus, Ohio
Bob still has his finger heavily wrapped and isn't squeezing his glove closed when catching pucks.

I can't see him playing this weekend at all.
 

Fro

Cheatin on CBJ w TBL
Mar 11, 2009
25,316
4,994
The Beach, FL
Rob Mixer ‏@RobMixer 4m4 minutes ago
Bobrovsky is catching and absorbing pucks with his glove hand, but hasn’t squeezed too many of them yet. I hope that makes sense. #CBJ


Rob Mixer ‏@RobMixer 1m1 minute ago
But it’s good news that Bobrovsky has stayed on and taken most of the reps. Have only seen Forsberg a few times. #CBJ
 

pete goegan

HFBoards Sponsor
Sponsor
Jun 6, 2006
13,020
350
Washington, DC
Rob Mixer ‏@RobMixer 4m4 minutes ago
Bobrovsky is catching and absorbing pucks with his glove hand, but hasn’t squeezed too many of them yet. I hope that makes sense. #CBJ


Rob Mixer ‏@RobMixer 1m1 minute ago
But it’s good news that Bobrovsky has stayed on and taken most of the reps. Have only seen Forsberg a few times. #CBJ

Well, the bad news is that it would appear Curtis is still slated to start in Bob's place. Even after his horrendous game vs. Tampa, I'd rather see Forsberg. At least he has the excuse of youth and inexperience.
 

BluejacketNut

Registered User
Sep 23, 2006
6,275
211
www.erazzphoto.com
Calvert will be an oft injured player for the rest of his career. He doesnt have the size to play the game he plays. And Skille is no real loss, he has pretty much 1 move/shot and thats pretty much it.
 

DarkandStormy

Registered User
Apr 29, 2014
7,236
3,432
614
Calvert will be an oft injured player for the rest of his career. He doesnt have the size to play the game he plays. And Skille is no real loss, he has pretty much 1 move/shot and thats pretty much it.

Yeah, because I'd rather have Dana Tyrell on the ice instead of Skille. Woof.
 

DarkandStormy

Registered User
Apr 29, 2014
7,236
3,432
614
this. looks like I wasn't quick enough

No worries. Don't get the hate for Skille. Is he going to ever live up to the hype of being a top 10 pick? Probably not. But he's been an effective forward for the team, can play up and down in the lineup, and he skates hard with a pretty wicked shot.
 

EDM

Registered User
Mar 8, 2008
6,273
2,065
Is there any idea what Calvert's injury is other than "upper body"?
 

BluejacketNut

Registered User
Sep 23, 2006
6,275
211
www.erazzphoto.com
No worries. Don't get the hate for Skille. Is he going to ever live up to the hype of being a top 10 pick? Probably not. But he's been an effective forward for the team, can play up and down in the lineup, and he skates hard with a pretty wicked shot.

Its not really hating, I just dont see anything special from him.
 

Xoggz22

Registered User
Mar 4, 2002
7,930
3,474
Columbus, Ohio
Well, the bad news is that it would appear Curtis is still slated to start in Bob's place. Even after his horrendous game vs. Tampa, I'd rather see Forsberg. At least he has the excuse of youth and inexperience.

Actually Forsberg started the TBL game and was horrendous giving up 4 in the first mostly on rebounds. Team in front wasn't very good but he isn't ready for the NHL.

We need some big players back and healthy.
 

CBJx614

HFBoards Sponsor
Sponsor
May 25, 2012
16,324
8,337
C-137
Again...Skille > Tyrell, Cracknell, Topp, etc. But go ahead, keep rolling out Cracknell - Wennberg - Tropp as your 3rd line.

Who else are we going to put there? Gibbons and Skills are both seeing top 6 time. Once we're healthy a few of the tweeners will get sent down(Tyrell, Cracknell) Tropp, Chaput or Bill will get scratched while Wennberg and one of Jenner, Anisimov or Letestu will play wing and our possession numbers will skyrocket.

When we are healthy I think our lineup looks a little something like this, at least until some players get back into gameshape and can take on more minutes

Foligno-Johansen-Atkinson
If it aint broke, dont fix it.

Hartnell-Jenner-Wennberg
Having Dubinsky back allows Wennberg to slide back to the wing and possibly see some favorable minutes in a role position a good playmaker on a very effectice cycle line. While its only a small sample, Jenner and Hartnell are meshing and are just absolutely on fire right now. And I think having Wennbergs speed and skill on that line will just create more chances for them, or vice versa.

Calvert-Dubinsky-Anisimov
Anisimov and Dubi havent played on the same line since they were first acquired from NYR and I could see this being a high energy, very effective two way line producing on both ends of the rink.

Gibbons-Letestu-Skille
This is the energy line, Skille is always a threat if he has space and the puck on his stick(if he can hit the net :laugh: ) while Letestu will drive possession and Gibbons is an effective playmaker. They all are pretty quick and tend to hold on to the puck pretty well.

Scratched
Boll, Cracknell

Now Wennberg wont see every shift with that line and is likely that he and Anisimov would swap out depending on who they are playing and the current situation on the ice. Richards likes to mix and match quite a bit but I really like giving Jenner the oppurtunity to roam freely around the ice in both ends. There was talk(not necessarily on these boards but in general) of him not having the speed to play center but I dont think thats true. His combination of physicality, tenacity and skill makes him too valuable to be stuck at wing.
 
Last edited:

EDM

Registered User
Mar 8, 2008
6,273
2,065
As anti-Wennberg as I am, I could see it making sense to put him on the line with Jenner and Hartnell as a "play making winger" rather than a "play making center' and allow Boone to roam around a bit more than a pure center ordinarily would.
 

EDM

Registered User
Mar 8, 2008
6,273
2,065
No Calvert Anisimov-Wennberg would be a bust. Wennberg would be placed in a scoring position and he is not a scorer.
 

CBJx614

HFBoards Sponsor
Sponsor
May 25, 2012
16,324
8,337
C-137

No Calvert Anisimov-Wennberg would be a bust. Wennberg would be placed in a scoring position and he is not a scorer.

Exactly. While yes that'd make the "2nd" line stronger the lines I proposed make the roster as whole stronger. It'd put size, speed, skill, and grit on each of the first 3 lines and would make matching up against us a potential nightmare IMO. Also any of those 3 lines I'd feel comfortable with defensively as well against most lines in the league.


Hartnell-Dubinsky-Jenner would make for a helluva PP though!
 

Viqsi

"that chick from Ohio"
Oct 5, 2007
55,777
35,417
40N 83W (approx)
No Calvert Anisimov-Wennberg would be a bust. Wennberg would be placed in a scoring position and he is not a scorer.
I'd swap Jenner and Wennberg, then. I don't think Jenner is ready to be a full-time NHL C yet, so Artie IMO has to be at C for now.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad