tlk
hARry kane comeS homE
Uhmmm yeah, just to cut of the 1-game ones.Minimum 20 games started
His sv% is .908 from the 1st of Jan regardless.
Uhmmm yeah, just to cut of the 1-game ones.Minimum 20 games started
You're right. It must have returned the wrong results or I mis-read it.Uhmmm yeah, just to cut of the 1-game ones.
His sv% is .908 from the 1st of Jan regardless.
Igor is BACK, last 6 games:
1.66 GAA
.950 save %
I'll start off my saying that obviously his numbers shot through the roof recently and most of the criticism has come before this stretch but as much as I and everyone criticized Shesterkin for the season he's having 0.914 is on par with three of the first four seasons of Lundqvist's career in a much more defensive league. Are we too hard on him? He set an impossible standard and he has had a substandard season for him but overall it's not as bad as it seemed.
Lundqvist's first 4 seasons:
View attachment 679712
I'll start off my saying that obviously his numbers shot through the roof recently and most of the criticism has come before this stretch but as much as I and everyone criticized Shesterkin for the season he's having 0.914 is on par with three of the first four seasons of Lundqvist's career in a much more defensive league. Are we too hard on him? He set an impossible standard and he has had a substandard season for him but overall it's not as bad as it seemed.
Lundqvist's first 4 seasons:
View attachment 679712
Who is this "we"? I recall you were the hardest on him during his rough stretch.
Just remember whenever we make comparisons to Lundqvist's performances, Henrik had complete trash skating in front of him for the first ~decade of his career. Every Rangers team in the years you posted was terrible; Henrik posting those numbers those years was nothing short of Herculean. Not knocking Igor at all, but I always have to chime in on this because you can never oversell how much of a one-man show that period of Rangers history was.I'll start off my saying that obviously his numbers shot through the roof recently and most of the criticism has come before this stretch but as much as I and everyone criticized Shesterkin for the season he's having 0.914 is on par with three of the first four seasons of Lundqvist's career in a much more defensive league. Are we too hard on him? He set an impossible standard and he has had a substandard season for him but overall it's not as bad as it seemed.
Lundqvist's first 4 seasons:
View attachment 679712
Just remember whenever we make comparisons to Lundqvist's performances, Henrik had complete trash skating in front of him for the first ~decade of his career. Every Rangers team in the years you posted was terrible; Henrik posting those numbers those years was nothing short of Herculean. Not knocking Igor at all, but I always have to chime in on this because you can never oversell how much of a one-man show that period of Rangers history was.
That's one thick layer of a large boulder tho.Hank came up huge against Pittsburgh but we could have beaten Philly and Montreal with a medium sized boulder in net.
That's where I wanna be: our goaltending is just another layer, like Vasilevskiy in Tampa.
So we have 2 seasons and 65 games of .930+ Igor, and 2 seasons and 91 games of .915 Igor.
So is it fair to say he's a .920 goalie who just has a larger standard deviation from the mean than Henrik did?
That's a good way to phrase it.
Lundqvist's sv% over his first 4 seasons was .917 while Shestyorkin's is .923. But I think save percentage in general has gone up around the league between 2005 and now, so that would explain the slight difference. I still think we need to see this type of performance for 5 more years before we can safely compare the two.
Here is what hockey-ref has as the league average SV% from 2005 to now, with the caveat that this season is not quite over (not that it'll wildly swing anyway). I put the shortened seasons in italics.Is the save % going up really true the last two seasons?
Having a great finish, but can we stop chanting Igor's Better until he wins a series vs Vasi?
You have one of 5 goalies in the league worth a damn (Vasilevskiy, Sorokin, Oettinger, and Hellebuyck). He's easily worth that amount of money and there will not be another player that the team will drop 8M on coming.Like the player but he can't be resigned for 8M+. Tampa can pay their goalie big because they pull talent out of their ass like no other team in the league. We can't