The Igor chat has seriously boggled my mind in this series. Guy runs in a record setting performance in Game 1 (second league wide all-time) and then proceeds to take flak for not winning a game we were shafted in.
Fast forward to Game 3 & 4, the worst goal we actually gave up was Georgiev's in Game 3.
In Game 4, I have rarely seen a more embarrassing effort from a Ranger team in the Playoffs. We could have had prime Hank, Hasek and Roy each take a period and the score wouldn't have been much different. What is the guy supposed to do when cross crease passes find a player wide open, or pucks are tipped in from right in front?
This narrative is growing legs and it is nonsense. If Igor doesn't play like prime Dominic Hasek then he is a bad goaltender? No! He is an excellent goaltender who just happens to maybe not be playing like the best goaltender of all time - who even himself couldn't always play to that standard every single game - whilst backing up a couple of defensive efforts (particularly last night) that would have seen us have our asses handed to us by Montreal, Ottawa, or probably quite a few AHL teams instead of those weasels.
I mean, people have watched the Rangers for years, no? Some cases decades? Can we not spot the worryingly familiar pattern of blame and complete reliance on a HoF goalie to bail us out when we decide / are seemingly incapable of putting forth any kind of 60 minute effort.
Yes, the offense is better (for the most part) than when Hank was here, however, if we are going to play D like these last two games then we are going to have to score 7 if you score 6 and become hockeys version of the Busby Babes.