Bergevin acquired Toffoli, Anderson, Allen and Edmundson.
He's made many risky trades, including ones where he gave up futures. He's tried to make risky moves too. The problem with Bergevin is not boldness or risk-taking and hearing those complaints are starting to justify Bergevin's dumb Playstation comment.
Bergevin's issues are that he made a dumb bet on Drouin (and being French Canadian probably played a part), he hasn't tried a proper rebuild, he's stuck with bad coaches too long (mostly Lefebvre and Therrien), has an iffy drafting record (especially early in his tenure), and he built a D-core in his and Richardson's image, which is totally outdated to how the game is played.
But bringing up winning attitude? For an organization that wont shut up about character and attitude? That brought in 6 cup winners and veterans praised around the league for their character and work ethic?
No, the issue isn't attitude nor is it boldness. Its a distinct lack of creativity. On the ice or in the front office.