TheOrangeDesk
Registered User
- May 27, 2015
- 1,194
- 1,568
How about a #1 goalie, you know what that is?
Something only 10 teams in the league have
How about a #1 goalie, you know what that is?
There's 20 goalies with .910 atm. Sooo...Something only 10 teams in the league have
Oilers finished with 109 points under a full season of woodcrodt...You guys couldnt stop goin on about how amazing Woodcroft was after his first half season and imagine what a full year with him looks like!
Edmonton will crumble once again when they have to face a legit opponent in the playoffs.
That go for everyone else telling you the same thing?Gonna be honest. You aren't even worth replying to
You can believe the Bruins and leafs are contenders if you want. For me, I think a team needs a top 6 centre or more than one NHL dman
You’re so far off the original post it isn’t even funny, it’s ok if you don’t want to admit you’re wrong thoughLol, instead of taking the L like any honorable poster would, you move the goal posts yourself saying that the Leafs lost to a finals team as well as the Oilers as if Florida and Vegas were equal even though the Oilers lost to the Cup champ that beat the team the Leafs lost to in 5 and did it with relative ease.
In terms of the L.A. vs. Tampa comparison. L.A. had 104 points while Tampa had 98 so.... wrong again.
Just take the L, you were wrong. It happens to all of us but it takes an honorable person to admit when they were wrong, are you going to take that path as any normal human would or are you going to take the dark path of being THAT guy that never admits he's wrong even when he knows he's wrong.
Which LA has, but everyone says they're not contenders because of goaltending, so which is it?There's 20 goalies with .910 atm. Sooo...
I've seen people list a bunch of West teams but then claim there's only one contender in the east. My claim is that there's likely 10 total and 5 from each conference give or take. That would include LAK imo. Tbh my qualm is mostly with over excited Oilers fans in this thread.Which LA has, but everyone says they're not contenders because of goaltending, so which is it?
Why do you watch/listen to Toronto media. You gage the internet?I agree. It is. Toronto sports media just needs to call it the weakest to cope with the Oilers being better than the Leaf’s.
I doubt it, but perhaps a few think they have the better teams.….are Eastern Conference fans upset that the Western Conference has the better teams now? Weird.
I've seen people list a bunch of West teams but then claim there's only one contender in the east. My claim is that there's likely 10 total and 5 from each conference give or take. That would include LAK imo. Tbh my qualm is mostly with over excited Oilers fans in this thread.
Here's that list. 16 different teams and are you saying Lindgren, varlamov, quick, woll, montembael are #1 goalies because I don't.There's 20 goalies with .910 atm. Sooo...
Unavoidable if your a hockey fan cause TSN and Sportsnet the supposed “national” broadcasters are all just Toronto shills. Everyone in Canada knows this.Why do you watch/listen to Toronto media. You gage the internet?
I doubt it, but perhaps a few think they have the better teams.
Well, I an not in Canada, but I think there are regional networks that are affiliated with those broadcasters.Unavoidable if your a hockey fans cause TSN and Sportsnet the supposed “national” broadcasters are all just Toronto shills. Everyone in Canada knows this.
On radio. Which TSN just shut down last summer in Edmonton. Did the same for Calgary and Vancouver the previous years I believe.Well, I an not in Canada, but I think there are regional networks that are affiliated with those broadcasters.
I doubt that would be a motivation. I think most Leaf fans were delighted with 1967, it was the last time the Leafs won the Cup.On radio. Which TSN just shut down last summer in Edmonton. Did the same for Calgary and Vancouver the previous years I believe.
TSN and Sportsnet have the rights, you want highlights, news, interviews etc etc it all goes through the Toronto shill filter first. A sad state of affairs of Hockey media in Canada really. All to make the most entitled fanbase feel slightly better about 1967.
For the guys you just mentioned that are over there's also a bunch that are under .910 that are definitely #1s like Shesterkin, Gibson, Oettinger etc...Here's that list. 16 different teams and are you saying Lindgren, varlamov, quick, woll, montembael are #1 goalies because I don't.
Also if 910 is your cut off then skinner was a #1 last year
I doubt that would be a motivation. I think most Leaf fans were delighted with 1967, it was the last time the Leafs won the Cup.
Okay then.When i say 1967 it means something different than how you’ve chosen to interpret it.
I don't see juggernauts in the other divisions either. So yeah, I totally agree with that last sentence.From the eye test thus far as a Canucks fan it’s not so much that the Pacific is very good so much as no team has stepped up and looked like a juggernaut yet. Teams like the Sharks are getting wins because they’re hungrier and battling harder. The Canucks are a good team but we should not be a top 3 in the conference team, at least not in a regular year.
I think with this being the last year of a stagnant cap we’re seeing the implications of good teams having to shed weight and regress to the mean.
If there was ever a year to load up at free agency and go for it it’s this season.
Gibson lol.For the guys you just mentioned that are over there's also a bunch that are under .910 that are definitely #1s like Shesterkin, Gibson, Oettinger etc...
I mean technically in points percentage it's exactly the same as being 5-3. That's how loser points work.Montreal is 4-3-2 against the Atlantic, this is not a winning record, it's a losing record.
It is the weakest. By far.I agree. It is. Toronto sports media just needs to call it the weakest to cope with the Oilers being better than the Leaf’s.