will1066
Registered User
- Oct 12, 2008
- 48,003
- 67,011
You paying?Who else wants to fly to Sweden and egg Mika’s burger joint?
You paying?Who else wants to fly to Sweden and egg Mika’s burger joint?
I have to feel like it says a lot about what Drury is thinking that (in a President Trophy type of year and desperately needing a 1RW for several years now since Buch left) he didn't get it done. Maybe reading too much into it, but makes me curious.....
Try being a Rangers, Bills and Mets fan since the late 80’s.
I mean blaming this game on Brodzinski makes no sense.That'll make a great banner to hang at MSG!
But you have to be able to watch the sport and differentiate between “really good,” and “good enough to win it all.” Too many get swept up in their fandom and can’t admit that this team continues to be a good, solid playoff team but not a Cup winning capable team and it was obvious in the offseason and regular season.Every f***ing game by 1 goal. I always have that doubt, if we'd just ... we're pretty f***ing good. Just not good enough.
The change to man on man was idiotic. It doesn't workRupp said the system was changed in the playoffs which made everyone confused... makes you wonder.
Youre not wrong. But my son is the same age I was in 94 and it has put it in perspective for me. There have been alot of 'good' teams in that span. Still waiting for a 'great' team and I thought this one was.I know. It sucks and it isn't good enough, but you have a 1 in 31 chance each year. Those aren't great odds. Then there are other factors, like injuries. It's hard to win. I take issue with a few guys on the team, but then there are others I like a lot so we will see how things change this summer.
I have to feel like it says a lot about what Drury is thinking that (in a President Trophy type of year and desperately needing a 1RW for several years now since Buch left) he didn't get it done. Maybe reading too much into it, but makes me curious.....
They had 114 points and won 10 playoff games. They were beaten by a better team. IMO they would have beaten every other team in the league and that includes Edmonton and Dallas. Drury has drafted well. I like what is in the pipeline. A lot of tough to play against guys, with a mix of speed and skill. Changes need to be made but they honestly aren't that far away. It seems like that now but if the right moves are made I can see them getting over the hump.There's a skeleton of a good team here if they fix the D corps, but I'm concerned about the philosophy from the top down.
They just don't prioritize effective 5v5 play. That's a huge deal.
I mean that was a great season considering the deficits of the roster. Kudos to the team and staff for getting as far as they did. There's nothing they should hang their head about. It's just no fun finishing top 4... when you're that close.
In the end, there were too many players on this Roster who weren't that effective against the Panthers. We don't have enough players who can win board battles against heavier teams. Our two biggest offensive players are allergic to the corners and surprisingly, the BIGGER one is by far the worst. Whenever there's a 50/50 battle, Zibby just chops at the puck hoping to knock it to a teammate blindly so he doesn't have to battle along the wall. Just no will to have an extended puck battle. I don't know what he's dealing with, but it's been that way all season. And maybe longer. And he either needs to fix that or we need to figure out how we can move him and rebuild that top line. I'm not saying he's not a great player. I'm not saying he's not effective at many things, I'm saying he's not nec the top line center on a stanley cup winner. Panarin is actually a bit more physical than Zibby and would be fine if the team around him had more firm, heavier players. But again, I would like a few others to be the focal point on the roster. We need Laffy to be paired with one other star forward who can impose themselves in a physical series and score the big goal when it's needed.
Our D aside from Fox and maybe Gus were very mid about moving the puck out of our zone. And Miller just makes so many soft plays with the puck for a big guy. If anyone remembers the turnover he made many years ago in the WJC final where Laffy knocked his D to D saucer pass out of the air and went in and scored the game winner... well, Miller is still doing that all over the ice. He lacks a consistent firmness. He and Schneider were just pretty bad with the puck all series. And we already had Trouba who's no genius with the puck. It's a bit too much to overcome when your D can't make simple smart plays with the puck. Now, some of that blame goes to the forwards. The support has to be there. The team had limited connectedness and part of that was the panthers and part of that were forwards who rely on pokechecking way too much.
No matter how many years I've watched hockey, it always seems to come back to the same ingredients -- are your go to offensive forwards sturdy/heavy enough to be effective in the hardest games in the hardest moments?
To me, this team needs to become Laffy's team going forward. And we need a few more high end leaders who are bulls. I was hoping Kakko would be that, but these playoffs made a really strong impression on me in regards to Kakko and his effectiveness. Trocheck and Kreider are fine, but he has to be in that second tier. Panarin would even be fine if he's not the one you're leaning on to get inside. Gaborik was on the Kings team that beat us in the finals. That was fine because they had Kopitar, Brown, Carter, Richards and Doughty. It wasn't Gabby's team. For this team to win the Cup at some point, it's gotta be Laffy and a few more trucks. The issue is, there are like 5-10 forwards like that in the whole league. This team is likely not winning a cup as constructed as there will always be a heavier team in the ECF -- be it the Panthers, the Lightning and whoever else comes along next and is built similarly. So, what to do? I dunno. I'm glad I'm not Drury...
Maybe Jalen Brunson or Josh Hart want to try hockey.
I hope they see the obvious problems.They had 114 points and won 10 playoff games. They were beaten by a better team. IMO they would have beaten every other team in the league and that includes Edmonton and Dallas. Drury has drafted well. I like what is in the pipeline. A lot of tough to play against guys, with a mix of speed and skill. Changes need to be made but they honestly aren't that far away. It seems like that now but if the right moves are made I can see them getting over the hump.
Othmann over Wyatt Johnson is looking like another winner.
Apologies for the outside opinion as a non-Rangers fan (I wanted you guys to win this series, no troll here) but I don't think I watched the same series as you. I didn't think Panarin was bringing it all series at all. I found him hesitant.It hurts but some of the hate is unreasonable here. Especially towards the breadman, he tried to pull this team into OT late in the 3rd and he carried the offense all year. Guys with balls win this time of year, he's one of those guys.
Did I hear less Kakko?Florida’s big bottom 6 ate ours for breakfast lunch and dinner. Lavi responded by wearing out the top guys. Less Kakko’s and Chytil’s and more Cuylle’s and Edstrom’s going forward.
I'm just not excited about him.
I see him as another guy who's too slow and his hits won't do anything.
That team was also dead tired by that last game. They had an excuse: they made it to the finals the season prior. And even during that series, we actually controlled play.
This series, we did...Game 2? Parts of Game 3?
Not disagreeing with that.Is he better than:
Brodzinski
Kakko
Chytil (This version)
Wheeler
If it's yes, you f***ing play him!
I honestly think Drury knows exactly what he needs to do and I do believe some significant changes will take place and that starts with the D.I hope they see the obvious problems.
There's an opportunity to do something if they do, and it would be really discouraging if they don't.
Guys they like have to go on the D corps. They need to make bold decisions.