Post-Game Talk: I don't have anything clever to put in the thread title

Status
Not open for further replies.

gravey9

Registered User
Dec 29, 2008
2,941
6,299
I mean that was a great season considering the deficits of the roster. Kudos to the team and staff for getting as far as they did. There's nothing they should hang their head about. It's just no fun finishing top 4... when you're that close.

In the end, there were too many players on this Roster who weren't that effective against the Panthers. We don't have enough players who can win board battles against heavier teams. Our two biggest offensive players are allergic to the corners and surprisingly, the BIGGER one is by far the worst. Whenever there's a 50/50 battle, Zibby just chops at the puck hoping to knock it to a teammate blindly so he doesn't have to battle along the wall. Just no will to have an extended puck battle. I don't know what he's dealing with, but it's been that way all season. And maybe longer. And he either needs to fix that or we need to figure out how we can move him and rebuild that top line. I'm not saying he's not a great player. I'm not saying he's not effective at many things, I'm saying he's not nec the top line center on a stanley cup winner. Panarin is actually a bit more physical than Zibby and would be fine if the team around him had more firm, heavier players. But again, I would like a few others to be the focal point on the roster. We need Laffy to be paired with one other star forward who can impose themselves in a physical series and score the big goal when it's needed.

Our D aside from Fox and maybe Gus were very mid about moving the puck out of our zone. And Miller just makes so many soft plays with the puck for a big guy. If anyone remembers the turnover he made many years ago in the WJC final where Laffy knocked his D to D saucer pass out of the air and went in and scored the game winner... well, Miller is still doing that all over the ice. He lacks a consistent firmness. He and Schneider were just pretty bad with the puck all series. And we already had Trouba who's no genius with the puck. It's a bit too much to overcome when your D can't make simple smart plays with the puck. Now, some of that blame goes to the forwards. The support has to be there. The team had limited connectedness and part of that was the panthers and part of that were forwards who rely on pokechecking way too much.

No matter how many years I've watched hockey, it always seems to come back to the same ingredients -- are your go to offensive forwards sturdy/heavy enough to be effective in the hardest games in the hardest moments?

To me, this team needs to become Laffy's team going forward. And we need a few more high end leaders who are bulls. I was hoping Kakko would be that, but these playoffs made a really strong impression on me in regards to Kakko and his effectiveness. Trocheck and Kreider are fine, but he has to be in that second tier. Panarin would even be fine if he's not the one you're leaning on to get inside. Gaborik was on the Kings team that beat us in the finals. That was fine because they had Kopitar, Brown, Carter, Richards and Doughty. It wasn't Gabby's team. For this team to win the Cup at some point, it's gotta be Laffy and a few more trucks. The issue is, there are like 5-10 forwards like that in the whole league. This team is likely not winning a cup as constructed as there will always be a heavier team in the ECF -- be it the Panthers, the Lightning and whoever else comes along next and is built similarly. So, what to do? I dunno. I'm glad I'm not Drury...

Maybe Jalen Brunson or Josh Hart want to try hockey.
 

GoAwayPanarin

HFBoards Sponsor
Sponsor
May 27, 2008
44,188
57,144
In High Altitoad
I have to feel like it says a lot about what Drury is thinking that (in a President Trophy type of year and desperately needing a 1RW for several years now since Buch left) he didn't get it done. Maybe reading too much into it, but makes me curious.....

I also don't think he would have made much of a difference here.

He wasn't really a stylistic fit for that line and a good version of what they needed wasn't available. I actually think it was pretty smart of him not to overpay in that situation.

What bugs me is that Berard wasn't given any burn with those 2. Maybe he wouldn't have been effective at all (and if that was the case then by all means, go ahead and make a trade) but he might have been and he would have been a cheaper in house option who at least has some mother f***er in his game.

The chips that they held onto can be used to fill holes on this team that are bigger needs. I don't like that they were unwilling to unweave Lindgren and Trouba from the fabric of the team but it also wasn't overly realistic. Maybe those are summer moves (they better be.)
 
  • Like
Reactions: Filip Chytil

mas0764

HFBoards Sponsor
Sponsor
Jul 16, 2005
14,471
12,296
Every f***ing game by 1 goal. I always have that doubt, if we'd just ... we're pretty f***ing good. Just not good enough.
But you have to be able to watch the sport and differentiate between “really good,” and “good enough to win it all.” Too many get swept up in their fandom and can’t admit that this team continues to be a good, solid playoff team but not a Cup winning capable team and it was obvious in the offseason and regular season.

To start with they HAVE TO be better at 5v5 and that’s gonna mean some of the guys who suck at it (like Mika and Trouba) have to go.
 

Captain Monglobster

Registered User
Nov 9, 2005
1,917
1,304
I know. It sucks and it isn't good enough, but you have a 1 in 31 chance each year. Those aren't great odds. Then there are other factors, like injuries. It's hard to win. I take issue with a few guys on the team, but then there are others I like a lot so we will see how things change this summer.
Youre not wrong. But my son is the same age I was in 94 and it has put it in perspective for me. There have been alot of 'good' teams in that span. Still waiting for a 'great' team and I thought this one was.
 
  • Like
Reactions: MrAlmost

mike14

Rampage Sherpa
Jun 22, 2006
18,841
12,154
Melbourne
I have to feel like it says a lot about what Drury is thinking that (in a President Trophy type of year and desperately needing a 1RW for several years now since Buch left) he didn't get it done. Maybe reading too much into it, but makes me curious.....

I said it earlier, but it kind of made sense at the time. For all our wins we were struggling 5v5 and there was a lot of talk about how 'unsustainable' and 'not suited for playoffs' our game style was. Trouba went down just before the TDL (not a big loss when you look at his play, but it would have an affect on how things are viewed), Chytil and Wheeler were already out, and he'd gone for the big names the season before while getting bounced quickly by a tema who there was still an outside chance we'd play again in rnd 1.
It was very possible that he'd swing for the fences again without much expectation of getting out of the 2nd round
 
  • Like
Reactions: Filip Chytil

PuckLuck3043

Stairway To Heaven
Nov 15, 2017
10,739
16,536
Hudson Valley
There's a skeleton of a good team here if they fix the D corps, but I'm concerned about the philosophy from the top down.

They just don't prioritize effective 5v5 play. That's a huge deal.
They had 114 points and won 10 playoff games. They were beaten by a better team. IMO they would have beaten every other team in the league and that includes Edmonton and Dallas. Drury has drafted well. I like what is in the pipeline. A lot of tough to play against guys, with a mix of speed and skill. Changes need to be made but they honestly aren't that far away. It seems like that now but if the right moves are made I can see them getting over the hump.
 

McRanger92

Registered User
Jun 7, 2017
11,387
21,051
I mean that was a great season considering the deficits of the roster. Kudos to the team and staff for getting as far as they did. There's nothing they should hang their head about. It's just no fun finishing top 4... when you're that close.

In the end, there were too many players on this Roster who weren't that effective against the Panthers. We don't have enough players who can win board battles against heavier teams. Our two biggest offensive players are allergic to the corners and surprisingly, the BIGGER one is by far the worst. Whenever there's a 50/50 battle, Zibby just chops at the puck hoping to knock it to a teammate blindly so he doesn't have to battle along the wall. Just no will to have an extended puck battle. I don't know what he's dealing with, but it's been that way all season. And maybe longer. And he either needs to fix that or we need to figure out how we can move him and rebuild that top line. I'm not saying he's not a great player. I'm not saying he's not effective at many things, I'm saying he's not nec the top line center on a stanley cup winner. Panarin is actually a bit more physical than Zibby and would be fine if the team around him had more firm, heavier players. But again, I would like a few others to be the focal point on the roster. We need Laffy to be paired with one other star forward who can impose themselves in a physical series and score the big goal when it's needed.

Our D aside from Fox and maybe Gus were very mid about moving the puck out of our zone. And Miller just makes so many soft plays with the puck for a big guy. If anyone remembers the turnover he made many years ago in the WJC final where Laffy knocked his D to D saucer pass out of the air and went in and scored the game winner... well, Miller is still doing that all over the ice. He lacks a consistent firmness. He and Schneider were just pretty bad with the puck all series. And we already had Trouba who's no genius with the puck. It's a bit too much to overcome when your D can't make simple smart plays with the puck. Now, some of that blame goes to the forwards. The support has to be there. The team had limited connectedness and part of that was the panthers and part of that were forwards who rely on pokechecking way too much.

No matter how many years I've watched hockey, it always seems to come back to the same ingredients -- are your go to offensive forwards sturdy/heavy enough to be effective in the hardest games in the hardest moments?

To me, this team needs to become Laffy's team going forward. And we need a few more high end leaders who are bulls. I was hoping Kakko would be that, but these playoffs made a really strong impression on me in regards to Kakko and his effectiveness. Trocheck and Kreider are fine, but he has to be in that second tier. Panarin would even be fine if he's not the one you're leaning on to get inside. Gaborik was on the Kings team that beat us in the finals. That was fine because they had Kopitar, Brown, Carter, Richards and Doughty. It wasn't Gabby's team. For this team to win the Cup at some point, it's gotta be Laffy and a few more trucks. The issue is, there are like 5-10 forwards like that in the whole league. This team is likely not winning a cup as constructed as there will always be a heavier team in the ECF -- be it the Panthers, the Lightning and whoever else comes along next and is built similarly. So, what to do? I dunno. I'm glad I'm not Drury...

Maybe Jalen Brunson or Josh Hart want to try hockey.

Florida’s big bottom 6 ate ours for breakfast lunch and dinner. Lavi responded by wearing out the top guys. Less Kakko’s and Chytil’s and more Cuylle’s and Edstrom’s going forward.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Slaydagnar

Machinehead

HFNYR MVP
Jan 21, 2011
147,927
126,658
NYC
They had 114 points and won 10 playoff games. They were beaten by a better team. IMO they would have beaten every other team in the league and that includes Edmonton and Dallas. Drury has drafted well. I like what is in the pipeline. A lot of tough to play against guys, with a mix of speed and skill. Changes need to be made but they honestly aren't that far away. It seems like that now but if the right moves are made I can see them getting over the hump.
I hope they see the obvious problems.

There's an opportunity to do something if they do, and it would be really discouraging if they don't.

Guys they like have to go on the D corps. They need to make bold decisions.
 
  • Like
Reactions: mike14

TheGreenTBer

JAMES DOES IT NEED A WASHER YES OR NO
Apr 30, 2021
9,941
12,173
It hurts but some of the hate is unreasonable here. Especially towards the breadman, he tried to pull this team into OT late in the 3rd and he carried the offense all year. Guys with balls win this time of year, he's one of those guys.
Apologies for the outside opinion as a non-Rangers fan (I wanted you guys to win this series, no troll here) but I don't think I watched the same series as you. I didn't think Panarin was bringing it all series at all. I found him hesitant.
 

haveandare

Registered User
Jul 2, 2009
19,000
7,622
New York
If you told me going into this season that we’d go into the playoffs with Fox hurt from game 1 on and we’d make it to the ECF, I’d have been pleasantly surprised. Fox clearly being injured has really been downplayed. He’s our most important skater by a lot. He scored at half the pace he has in the playoffs in previous years. Talk about not generating offense, there a HUGE part of the reason why.

It’s not one persons fault of course but man, Trouba absolutely stood out as an anchor this series. So many stupid penalties or poorly timed hit attempts. Replacing him with an average top 4 player would do a world of good on the ice though clearly he’s important in the room.

The main thing that concerns me honestly is that the coaching didn’t really rise to the challenge when it mattered most. Clearly Lac did a great job bringing the guys together and actually coaching them and pushing them in contrast to Gallant, but man the staff didn’t seem to have any ideas to adapt to what Florida was doing for the last 5ish games and that freaks me out a bit.
 

GoAwayPanarin

HFBoards Sponsor
Sponsor
May 27, 2008
44,188
57,144
In High Altitoad
That team was also dead tired by that last game. They had an excuse: they made it to the finals the season prior. And even during that series, we actually controlled play.

This series, we did...Game 2? Parts of Game 3?

Games 1+2 and parts of every game in this series.

FWIW I'm 100% okay with losing this series. I was way more worried about this one than I was about Carolina (which I would have been ultra pissed if they had lost.) I'd be ultimately fine if they ended up losing to Dallas too because I've long felt that the west (and the cup) ran through them. It still may.

A series like this is far from the worst thing in the world. You get to see where you need to improve and it would really behoove the FO to pay attention to what is going on during the games instead of overvaluing grit and blood and toughness. It's okay (or even preferable) to add that shit when it comes in the form of good players, not when it comes in the form of Jacob Trouba and f***ing Ryan Lindgren who very well may be the worst player in the league in a top 4.
 

PuckLuck3043

Stairway To Heaven
Nov 15, 2017
10,739
16,536
Hudson Valley
I hope they see the obvious problems.

There's an opportunity to do something if they do, and it would be really discouraging if they don't.

Guys they like have to go on the D corps. They need to make bold decisions.
I honestly think Drury knows exactly what he needs to do and I do believe some significant changes will take place and that starts with the D.
 

McRanger92

Registered User
Jun 7, 2017
11,387
21,051
I would be fine with seeing a complete overhaul of the non-Fox defense. 2 goals all playoffs from the D and Miller scores his in game 1 against Washington. He was really horrendous. A Mika level temperament in his role is tough to over come. If you could put Lindgren’s heart in Miller’s body you’d get a stud. Not to single out K’Andre because Trouba and Gus were pretty much unplayable.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad