Gary Nylund
Registered User
- Oct 10, 2013
- 31,359
- 24,863
So which are you?You just perfectly encapsulated the difference between an experienced GM and a fan.
So which are you?You just perfectly encapsulated the difference between an experienced GM and a fan.
The leafs trade history during the 2016/17 season was shuffling around picks and prospects with other teams. Anderson was 25 (I think?) when the leafs got him. It wasn't a "win now" trade. It was a "we found a long term goalie" trade.
The leafs only started doing "win now" trades (at the expense of picks and prospects) after the all rookie team snuck into the playoffs. The leafs winning that game against the Penguins in April 2017 was one of the worst things to ever happen to this franchise.
Just a fan........I freely admit I didn't realize what the drawbacks would be at the time of the Tavares signing.So which are you?
I get that with the benefit of hindsight people are dumping on the signing, I still think it was fine though. Firstly, nobody knew covid was coming and if that doesn't happen, the cap keeps going up and his cap hit isn't so bad. Paying Marner 11 instead of 9, that was the mega blunder.Just a fan........I freely admit I didn't realize what the drawbacks would be at the time of the Tavares signing.
Just like the inexperienced GM
I get that with the benefit of hindsight people are dumping on the signing, I still think it was fine though. Firstly, nobody knew covid was coming and if that doesn't happen, the cap keeps going up and his cap hit isn't so bad. Paying Marner 11 instead of 9, that was the mega blunder.
There were many, many teams wanting to sign JT, I'm pretty sure it wasn't just the inexperienced ones.
The real problem with this team is that there is a lack of character and leadership at the top, and by the top I mean M&M. But who knew?
I broached the idea of trading Marner after losing to MTL in the playoffs. Had we done that and gotten the right return, things could be much different today. Of course getting the right return isn't a given, we basically need a Messier type who can light a fire under Matthews but no what what we got back for Marner, hard to imagine things being worse than they are now.
People were yelling at me for wanting to "get rid of him" which was not what I was suggesting, when you trade a guy with his resume, you get a ton back which is what I wanted. A 1st team all-star under contract for 4 more years, yeah we would have got a lot back in return. The only negatives were his salary and his playoff performance but still, many teams would have been very interested.
The Hawks began the rebuild with an emphasis on defenseWhat are you talking about? Chicago didn't focus on defense, they drafted Keith and Seabrook yes, but they weren't the focus, nobody thought they would be what they became.
Kane and Towes were always the real focus
Same. I loved the JT signing at the time.Just a fan........I freely admit I didn't realize what the drawbacks would be at the time of the Tavares signing.
Just like the inexperienced GM
[Bump. I replied to your question, maybe you missed it?]Simple. When was the last time a team made a UFA their highest paid player to play a 2nd line position?
Because not surprisingly there are limited funds in the cap era.[Bump. I replied to your question, maybe you missed it?]
I am not sure why you gave such an oddly specific circumstance to make your point. I don't know when the LAST time that happened, but I do know Chicago had a young core, signed UFA Hossa to be their highest paid player. He was their fifth highest scorer in the regular season and seventh highest in their cup run. They went on to win there cups after they signed him.
Why did you ask?
What? Hossa was signed in the cap era too.Because not surprisingly there are limited funds in the cap era.
$11M for a player slated to be the #2C was and remains unprecedented (nod to @Throw More Waffles)
Is it just me or are you completely moving the goalposts on your position here? You basically just changed your parameters and took the exact specifics of the Tavares deal and said no one had done that exact thing before.
We was the first line winger wasn’t he?What? Hossa was signed in the cap era too.
You asked for a precedent that a team has never signed a UFA who was not a top line player to be their top paid player. That was Hossa.
He was a UFA
He signed as their highest paid player
He was not one of their top 3 or 4 players.
They won the cup. Three times. Two differences. One, they were able to do a 12-year back diving deal to keep AAV down (still highest paid though), and two, the cap didn't go flat soon after due to a pandemic.
Is it just me or are you completely moving the goalposts on your position here? You basically just changed your parameters and took the exact specifics of the Tavares deal and said no one had done that exact thing before.
Same. I loved the JT signing at the time.
I didn't think a 30-35ish goal scorer and ppg player was worth 11 mil. But I rationalized that by saying he spent most of his career playing with stiffs on lousy teams. I thought that being surrounded by the young stars on the leafs and being sheltered behind Matthews getting all of the "shut down" players attention, I thought the first 5 or so years of that contract would be like his first season here. Well near 50 goals. That would be worth 11 mil for a ufa. Instead, he's been good but not "11 million" good. Other than 1 great season, he is the same 30-35 goal ppg center he's been his whole career.
I also didn't consider what it would do to internal cap structures. I don't think anybody saw the unprecedented dramatic overpayments coming. Even when the gm position was given to a rookie.
Every other dam team had to deal with the pandemic and some of them one a cup…….even Vegas a new franchise.I would have not lined my re-build up with a pandemic that brought an unprecedented and unforseen flat cap era. In the seven years prior to the pandemic the cap rose and average of 4.5% per year.
If that trajectory had continued we would now be at a cap of $97M. The Leafs would be a cap team and others would not, unlike now where the flat cap has brought everyone to the same level basically.
We wouldn't have had to let players walk in UFA and we could have had more to spend on additions to our team. How much better does this team look with Hyman, Mikheyev and Pietrangelo? How much better do our core four contracts look if the cap was at $97M today?
How would you add to a core of:
Matthews
Marner
Nylander
Tavares
Hyman
Mikheyev
Knies
Robertson
Kampf
Pietrangelo
Rielly
Brodie
Liljegren
Woll
With ~$19M to spare. This is not excuses, it's fact. We had a plan that was based on the cap growing like it had EVERY OTHER year. We signed four expensive pieces with this plan. The world changed overnight and no NHL team was hurt as much by this as the Maple Leafs.
I think everyone should answer the question as if they were managing a rebuild that would have the cap grow 4.5% every year and then tell us how they would have pivoted once it suddenly stopped increasing.
The Hawks began the rebuild with an emphasis on defense
Your forgetting they took Cam Barker 3rd OA in 2004 and he was supposed to be their franchise D with Seabrook and Keith after him
Toews + Kane came in 06 and 07
If Dubas hadn’t signed Tavares the pandemic wouldn’t have mattered, just ask the teams that win the cup during the pandemic and since. It didn’t seem to bother themStart a rebuild? Matthews already re-signed for medium term so rebuild is not an option. Leafs will go for it until Matthews decides to f*** off or his play drastically drops off.
JT signing is fine if not for the pandemic and if Dubas doesn't get absolutely rolled in contract negotiations by Matthews, Marner, and Nylander. Nylander contract ended up being the best of the bunch and a bargain but Dubas allowing it to drag on let Matthews and Marner's agents know blood was in the water and they pounced.
Can't do anything about the pandemic, but if Dubas had handled the contracts better and had Tavares as the ceiling then we'd have been a lot better off. Matthews should've never gotten more on a shorter term deal and Mitch shouldn't have sniffed double digit millions.
What? Hossa was signed in the cap era too.
You asked for a precedent that a team has never signed a UFA who was not a top line player to be their top paid player. That was Hossa.
He was a UFA
He signed as their highest paid player
He was not one of their top 3 or 4 players.
Centre depth wasn’t a issue when they acquired JT, so no, not every GM would have. The good one’s would have tried to improve what the team was lacking……..Any GM of the Leafs would have pitched hard at JT.
Folks forget that Lou and Shanny made a hard sell to Stamkos a couple season earlier when he flirted with free agency, they even brought in the Canadian Tire CEO and Toronto Mayor at the time.
It's almost as if people don't realize tavarss has been inconsistentJust a fan........I freely admit I didn't realize what the drawbacks would be at the time of the Tavares signing.
Just like the inexperienced GM
Not sign every player to 11 million coming off entry levelDon't hire a rookie GM to lead it.
Tavares earned his ufa contract .he'd have gotten 10 at least to stay on the islandSadly you are not wrong but if Matty and Mitch do not have what it takes to push the ball over the goal line, it really does not make any difference whether they fast tracked the rebuild by signing Tavares. That has been the constant with this team and until they prove they can, they are the #1 reason IMO that they have not advanced past 1 win in round #2.