- Apr 27, 2005
- 34,852
- 32,889
Rantanen and Kane are probably his closest comparables, and Marner had shown a higher level of production (and good PK ability) at time of signing his post-ELC contract, by an amount consistent with the difference in his contract.
Kane's contract was 12 years ago, not a comparable.
Rantanen signed after Marner, but you'll need to show your math on Marner being the more productive player.
In the two years leading up to their extensions:
164gp 48g 163p
vs
156gp 60g 171p
You're right, one of those guys deserves 1.7M more than the other. But it's not Marner.
It's honestly laughable watching leaf fans attempt to justify such a massive overpayment to a player who continually lets them down in the playoffs.