Stop man. Just stop.Marner was better than Kane throughout their respective pre-signing periods, and Kane got the equivalent of a 9.04m x 5 year contract under an 81.5m cap.
1. I did not have any absence. Not sure what you're even talking about.I knew it! He spent his absence coming up with a new "model" and that's one of the first results it spit out.
Especially pure playmakers. Panarin is a playmaker, but dude can score high 30s in goals too. Kucherov is an amazing playmaker, but also scores 40 goals. Marner this year was taking a step forward as he was on pace for 30 goals in the regular season but then the playoffs happened. IMO our stars both have the opposite problem. Marner can pass, but can’t shoot. Matthews can shoot, but not pass.playmakers are never worth $11m/yr, it is as simple as that
Marner probably has a 3 million overpaid because of his magician abilities. Never seen such an impressive disappearing act in the playoffs.
At time of signing their post ELC contracts, their P/GP was:
Marner: 0.93
Rantanen: 0.87
Gaudreau: 0.89
And if we were to remove the noise of EN points, we'd end up with:
Marner: 0.90
Rantanen: 0.82
Gaudreau: 0.84
And their primary points/GP...
Marner: 0.71
Rantanen: 0.64
Gaudreau: 0.68
And without EN...
Marner: 0.68
Rantanen: 0.59
Gaudreau: 0.65
And when we look at more accurate metrics than per-game, and consider things like PP TOI which skews raw production...
ES Points/60
Marner: 2.56
Rantanen: 2.13
Gaudreau 2.76
ES Primary Points/60
Marner: 2.05
Rantanen: 1.58
Gaudreau 1.92
ES Goals/60
Marner: 0.86
Rantanen: 0.78
Gaudreau 0.97
PP Points/60
Marner: 7.19
Rantanen: 5.78
Gaudreau: 4.95
PP Primary Points/60
Marner: 4.69
Rantanen: 4.15
Gaudreau: 4.01
PP Goals/60
Rantanen: 2.37
Marner: 1.56
Gaudreau: 1.65
Gaudreau was 12th in league scoring during his ELC
Marner was 22nd
Gaudreau had to carry the offense around him.
Marner was supported by Tavares, Matthews, and Nylander.
Gaudreau signed for 9.25% of the cap....
Maybe round that up to 10% for Marner's "penalty killing" and that's $8M. I think 9-9.5 should have been the absolute MAXIMUM Toronto was willing to pay. And now they are paying the price.
Marner is heinously overpaid.
That's not really relevant to the point I was making. It's also wrong, but that's another story.Since his 99 and 84 pts seasons, Gaudreau has been out classed by him.
You don’t want to see a 6’0 175lbs winger transition to Center. I predict it would be uglyCould Marner play centre? Would have more value (or closer to the cost of his contract) if he could play centre.
That's not really relevant to the point I was making. It's also wrong, but that's another story.
Lets do this:
Gaudreau 19-20 58pts. Marner 67pts
Gaudreau 20-21 49pts. Marner 67pts again.
How am I wrong?
You could obviously argue that Matthews, Nylander and Marner are worth their salaries based on production relative to what other players in the NHL are paid. But when you compare their contracts to other young rfa contracts they are obviously overpaid (Point, Barzal, Draisaitl, Pastrnak, Aho, Barkov etc).
The Toronto guys got ufa type money on rfa contracts that take them to ufa status fairly quickly which is just awful cap management by Dubas. I said it at the time that Dubas will pay for his idealism of "make it work for the player and his family" attitude towards the contracts. Its a cap world, every $ counts and even if they win one day he made it a lot more difficult for himself by being so idealistic about the contracts....
Marner is like 2mil overpaid, it’s not that bad. Nylander is worth his contract. The guy that’s gonna be overpaid is JT.
I agree. In my opinion Tavares is probably an 8-8.5 million dollar player, and should’ve gotten 9-9.5 due to being a ufa."Gonna be"? He was overpaid the second they signed him to that deal. Tavares is not an $11 million player. At the time of his signing, he was the second highest paid forward in hockey, only behind a guy who's consistently in the running for the Art Ross every season.
"Gonna be"? He was overpaid the second they signed him to that deal. Tavares is not an $11 million player. At the time of his signing, he was the second highest paid forward in hockey, only behind a guy who's consistently in the running for the Art Ross every season.
#1 in points on 20 teams
#1 in goals on 24 teams
No, he wasn't. That ignores how contracts work in multiple ways.He was paid like the 2nd best player in hockey
Matthews took more % of the cap than Crosby and only had to sign for 5 years. The Big 4 Contracts ran a train on Dubas.Marner isn't really overpaid, that much.
He's never taking a 7-8 million a year contract and you might get him at 9.5-10...
Nylander is correctly paid.
(Also, lol @ Matthews not being worth 11.34, guy is a Hart finalist, Richard winner and does well on takeaways too. Elite centres gun get payd.)
Key thing is does Lou Lam give out those contracts to those guys? Of course he doesn’t". And he then has cap room to fill out his supporting cast.Matthews took more % of the cap than Crosby and only had to sign for 5 years. The Big 4 Contracts ran a train on Dubas.