How Many Games Will Jordan Weal Play?

  • Xenforo Cloud will be upgrading us to version 2.3.5 on March 3rd at 12 AM GMT. This version has increased stability and fixes several bugs. We expect downtime for the duration of the update. The admin team will continue to work on existing issues, templates and upgrade all necessary available addons to minimize impact of this new version. Click Here for Updates
I can generally agree with what you're saying, I'll just have to disagree on the point that 'showcases' happen as a primary motivation for a player to get into a lineup. Is it an auxiliary benefit? Certainly (in most cases, heh). It would benefit Weal to be getting playing time from a trade value standpoint, but that's not why he'd come into the lineup, imo, and that goes for just about anyone else.

So far too, looks like the majority says he'll only be in 10-25 games.

thoses are not the only showcases There are players that get more ice time imo to see if they can handle it.

Oh i agree there are other benefits from putting him in Motivation for who ever come out to get back in being the first to come to mind. However higher trade value is what i would be putting him in there for. We need to get more picks in drafts and having players like Weal get a high pick will help us continue restocking the farm team. I have never once hid the fact i think weal will be traded so i have been only thinking along that line. I honestly dont see where he fits in I still see him as small and the 2nd times i saw him get physical he ended up on his ass. boy against men. With us being a known as a physical team he becomes a target bein the smallest king. Player Mr doty we are not far apart in our thinking as i am with most


Yup now i have a question for u DO u think 10 -25 games is a waste ?
 
I have chosen not to try and go thru a year of tsn shows to find proof There is a difference between can't proving something and wasting hours of searching to prove some who is on the internet wrong I made the right choice

If it takes you hours to find, it means it either doesn't happen at all or so rarely its not worth mentioning is my point. Thanks for proving it.
 
No, because I think he'll earn whatever he gets. I have zero problem with him sitting and absorbing right now. I just think he'll see more than that due to normal ebbs and flows of a season including injuries.
 
If it takes you hours to find, it means it either doesn't happen at all or so rarely its not worth mentioning is my point. Thanks for proving it.

that is your opinion I i know how good my computer skills are an i know its not worth wasting my time to change your opinion Which is exactly that a opinion that doesnt change even when proven wrong :) have a nice day


or crappy computer skills which is the real reason
 
Last edited:
No, because I think he'll earn whatever he gets. I have zero problem with him sitting and absorbing right now. I just think he'll see more than that due to normal ebbs and flows of a season including injuries.

I think it is. your wasting cheap year with a young top six player. Its not like aa sitting last year he doesnt have the same skill set


also alot of better players coming imo kempe zykov mersch to name a few Needs to show something this year or hes going to get pushed over the roster
 
that is your opinion I i know how good my computer skills are an i know its not worth wasting my time to change your opinion Which is exactly that a opinion that doesnt change even when proven wrong :) have a nice day


or crappy computer skills which is the real reason

Any time someone disagrees with your opinion (which is what I did) you go on and on saying you're right and can't back it up. As I said, if you don't like people speaking against your opinion, either be ready to back it up or stop getting ticked at anyone who takes a position opposite yours.
 
The season is 82 games long, Weal will get some games, either earned or unearned (injury). It will happen.

Not even 10 games into the season, yet. Patience, you must learn patience. "Spend eighteen hours every day under the lash of a Romulan guard, and you'll soon understand patience". :)

Also Gann is not the only reporter or person to have met Jordan Weal.
 
Last edited:
Any time someone disagrees with your opinion (which is what I did) you go on and on saying you're right and can't back it up. As I said, if you don't like people speaking against your opinion, either be ready to back it up or stop getting ticked at anyone who takes a position opposite yours.

Umm your absolutely wrong look at my disagreement with mr Doty as a perfect example. We have disagreed on the weal use however he can make his point without being condescending unlike you Its the condescending people that answer me that get the same feed back they give me You and a few other in here get what they give :) I can have discussions on hockey with anyone and do Its when someone gets condescending i can as you ticked Its all in the delivery my friend
 
Last edited:
Umm your absolutely wrong look at my disagreement with mr Doty as a perfect example. We have disagreed on the weal use however he can make his point without being condescending unlike you Its the considering people that answer me that get the same feed back they give me You and a few other in here get what they give :) I can have discussions on hockey with anyone and do Its when someone gets condescending i can as you ticked Its all in the delivery my friend

Asking you to prove your statement is not condescending.
 
Asking you to prove your statement is not condescending.

no but asking more then once in a demanding tone is I answer both mr doty and Decales That was proving my point Your asking for a needle in a hay stack request I remember the tsn pair saying this last year ish between the months of nov - march that's a lot of video and audio to go thru So for you to say it easy to find is condescending to assume i have the technical knowledge to do so. Not all people are gifted in searching for stuff on the net. Also your asking for it doesn't not make me have to say yes to your request :) Your need to learn no means no
 
Again, if it's a needle in the haystack thing that means it rarely if every happens. That's my point. Again, thank you for confirming it.
 
Again, if it's a needle in the haystack thing that means it rarely if every happens. That's my point. Again, thank you for confirming it.

What do u call a few words in 4-5 months of video to look thru prove your wrong Your not simply that important to prove wrong You sir are great at twisting someones words i Give you that It is also why proving you wrong doesn't mean anything to me I have backed up my word before with you and you never admit your wrong I accept that from you and know its not worth my time to do it. Your being wrong and your opinion of me being wrong isnt worth going thru that much video sorry You think im wrong fine think that i won't lose any sleep over it. Your demanding this proof is not going to get me to do it So i suggest we agree to disagree or you put me on ignore Either way this debate is over to me again have a nice day
 
Management is higher on a decent but overall fringe player than they are on their own head coach? Yeah, ok. If Jordan Weal outranks your coach, you get rid of said coach, not roll into a huge season with him after betting the farm on this squad with the Lucic deal.

i.e. management is high on Weal

Sutter is not.

Didn't mean for it to sound like they are higher on Weal than they are on Sutter.
 
Like I said in the GDT, now is the perfect time to get Weal in the lineup with Kopitar struggling and AA looking worse by the game. I don't think it would be the worst thing in the world to put Kopi on the third line and let him find his game against a bad team, Weal can also get some top 6 minutes under his belt.

But yeah there's no reason Andy should be playing over Weal, roles or not.
 
I still don't see what Andreoff brings to the table. Not that Weal is a huge improvement in the bottom six. But I'd like to get Weal a game or two where the Kings look pretty good, too... The Arizona game was one of the worst all-around Kings performances I've seen in years.
 
not sure what the odds are. looking bleak at this point?

the 4th line has been poor for 3 games but no change. sutter shifted the 3rd, moving pearson up for a bit last night, which was good, but he seems to believe in that 4th line.

weal has been in warmups, in uniform the last couple of games. but then immediately benched. why would sutter put him on the ice in the first place if no intent to skate him? i don't get that.
 
Why should Weal be playing when Andreoff is playing so well? I mean, Andreoff is a proven NHL vet at this point, right? :sarcasm:
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad