HOH Top 60 Goaltenders of All Time (2024 Edition) - Round 2, Vote 1

overpass

Registered User
Jun 7, 2007
5,553
3,899
Ottawa, ON
Not trying to open a can of worms here, but a lot of work has been done isolating a lot of different "types" of goals against. Some that matter more, some that matter less... what's left? in a tight playoff game, where almost every goal has some eventual importance, what are "normal" goals that we don't either hold against the goalie to a greater extent, or whitewash away?

I mean, if they allow the first goal, that's bad. if they allow a tying goal that's bad. if they allow a winning goal, that's bad. garbage time goals get disregarded. In the dead puck era, it feels like most goals would be in one of those categories, so what's even left?

The obvious answer is close games matter more, blowouts matter less. Third period performance is either less important (because one team has a comfortable lead) or more important (because it's close). Which you know, of course.

I think the first goal can have extra importance because it can dictate how the rest of the game is played. Especially in low scoring eras where one team can park the bus and make it really hard to score. For example, the DPE Sens were very reliant on getting the first goal because they were much better at scoring on counterattacks than against a team with 5 back. So it was particularly hard if Lalime gave up the first goal. But the first goal hasn't mattered as much in more recent higher scoring seasons, because you just can't defend a lead as well. I'm sure we've all seen the difference.

So the data from teams and eras that we didn't watch can help inform which goals mattered more, if any.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Bear of Bad News

VanIslander

20 years of All-Time Drafts on HfBoards
Sep 4, 2004
36,163
6,849
South Korea
Goalie or captain are default options when others don't stick out. (Just ask Crosby.)

Plante was the Hart trophy winner in their record 5th consecutive year. Boom Boom won it the year before. Beliveau was a candidate to win it again. Harvey, Richard...

Plante was dead in Hart voting every other year of his career except a late one in Toronto. Plante was not a regular candidate for MVP, but got it suddenly out of the blue, at the tail end of the Habs 5-year dynasty (coincidentally a famous Canadian children's book was popular).

And remember: his Vezinas were automatic formulaic awards, not voted on by peers.

If you respect contemporary opinion, then Vezinas & cups mean a whole lot.less in that era than 1st/2nd team all star selections and the opinions of your opponents (of players NOT on your team; especially of the best of the best who rave about you).

Hall is arguably the 3rd best goalie ever.
In the 1970s i recall lively debates about how Hall & Sawchuk are better than Plante! How Tretiak may be the best ever (this pre-1980s Roy & Hasek).

Plante was a great subject of a popular children's book though.
 
Last edited:

jigglysquishy

Registered User
Jun 20, 2011
8,438
9,274
Regina, Saskatchewan
and the opinions of your opponents (of players NOT on your team; especially of the best of the best who rave about you).
Do we have any contemporary reports from players raving about Hall?

We certainly do about Sawchuk and Plante.

Beliveau going out of his way to praise Sawchuk is relevant.

Howe explicitly preferring Sawchuk to Hall is relevant.

Bowman praising Sawchuk and Plante is relevant.

Hall is never spoken of poorly. But he isn't heaped with praise like Plante and particularly Sawchuk are.
 

VanIslander

20 years of All-Time Drafts on HfBoards
Sep 4, 2004
36,163
6,849
South Korea
"Glenn was a breed apart. Not only for what he did on the ice, but for how he was in the locker room and with fans. In a class by himself." - SCOTTY BOWMAN, after Hall won a record 7th 1st team all star, at least one from each of three different franchises.
 

ContrarianGoaltender

Registered User
Feb 28, 2007
916
1,027
tcghockey.com
There's been a lot of talk about Patrick Roy's elite save percentage results, his number of times leading the league and so on.

I wanted to see how they look after adjusting for coaching, so for all of Roy's seasons from 1986-87 to 2002-03 I used my coaching ratings (and nothing else, these are all the raw ratings with no adjustments) on every goalie season with at least 30 GP, and then ranked them by save percentage.

1986-87 (edited - first table posted had an error):

RankGoalieGPSV%GSAACoachCoach RatingAdj SV%Adj GSAA
1​
Ron Hextall
66​
0.902​
41.8​
Keenan
0.97​
0.899​
36.5​
2​
Daniel Berthiaume
31​
0.885​
4.2​
Maloney D
1.07​
0.893​
10.4​
3​
Glen Hanlon
36​
0.893​
13.1​
Demers
0.99​
0.892​
11.7​
4​
Allan Bester
36​
0.889​
8.7​
Brophy
1.02​
0.891​
11.3​
5​
Mark LaForest
5​
0.892​
1.3​
Demers
0.99​
0.891​
1.2​
6​
Mario Gosselin
30​
0.886​
4.7​
Bergeron
1.03​
0.889​
7.0​
7​
Pokey Reddick
48​
0.881​
1.7​
Maloney D
1.07​
0.889​
11.6​
8​
Bob Froese
31​
0.885​
4.8​
Esposito
1.03​
0.889​
7.9​
9​
Brian Hayward
37​
0.893​
13.0​
Perron
0.95​
0.888​
7.7​
10​
Mike Liut
59​
0.885​
7.9​
Evans
1.03​
0.888​
12.9​
14
Patrick Roy
46
0.891
13.9
Perron
0.95
0.886
7.1

1987-88:

RankGoalieGPSV%GSAACoachCoach RatingAdj SV%Adj GSAA
1​
Kelly Hrudey
54​
0.896​
23.3​
Simpson T
1.01​
0.896​
24.2​
2​
Greg Stefan
33​
0.896​
14.9​
Demers
0.99​
0.895​
13.7​
3
Patrick Roy
45
0.900
25.0
Perron
0.95
0.895
18.5
4​
Tom Barrasso
54​
0.896​
26.2​
Sator
0.99​
0.894​
24.2​
5​
Billy Smith
38​
0.894​
14.6​
Simpson T
1.01​
0.894​
15.3​
6​
Pete Peeters
35​
0.898​
16.1​
Murray Bry
0.96​
0.894​
12.3​
7​
John Vanbiesbrouck
56​
0.890​
17.3​
Bergeron
1.03​
0.893​
22.2​
8​
Brian Hayward
39​
0.896​
17.0​
Perron
0.95​
0.891​
11.5​
9​
Daniel Berthiaume
56​
0.882​
2.9​
Maloney D
1.07​
0.890​
14.6​
10​
Glen Hanlon
47​
0.891​
14.3​
Demers
0.99​
0.889​
12.5​

1988-89:

RankGoalieGPSV%GSAACoachCoach RatingAdj SV%Adj GSAA
1​
Jon Casey
55​
0.900​
31.1​
Page
1.01​
0.901​
32.8​
2​
Mike Vernon
52​
0.897​
22.7​
Crisp
1.04​
0.901​
27.2​
3​
Kari Takko
32​
0.899​
17.9​
Page
1.01​
0.900​
19.0​
4
Patrick Roy
48
0.908
35.2
Burns P
0.90
0.897
22.4
5​
Peter Sidorkiewicz
44​
0.890​
12.8​
Pleau
1.02​
0.892​
15.5​
6​
Steve Weeks
35​
0.892​
12.4​
McCammon
1.00​
0.892​
11.9​
7​
Kirk McLean
42​
0.891​
14.0​
McCammon
1.00​
0.891​
13.4​
8​
Ron Hextall
64​
0.891​
22.3​
Holmgren
0.99​
0.890​
20.8​
9​
Alan Bester
43​
0.890​
15.1​
Armstrong
1.00​
0.890​
15.1​
10​
Daren Puppa
37​
0.889​
9.1​
Sator
0.99​
0.887​
7.8​

1989-90:

RankGoalieGPSV%GSAACoachCoach RatingAdj SV%Adj GSAA
1​
Mike Liut
37​
0.905​
23.0​
Ley
1.06​
0.910​
28.2​
2
Patrick Roy
54
0.912
47.4
Burns P
0.90
0.902
32.2
3​
Jon Casey
61​
0.896​
25.9​
Page
1.01​
0.897​
28.0​
4​
Andy Moog
46​
0.893​
14.5​
Milbury
1.03​
0.896​
17.9​
5​
Rejean Lemelin
43​
0.892​
11.2​
Milbury
1.03​
0.895​
14.2​
6​
Daren Puppa
56​
0.903​
35.7​
Dudley
0.90​
0.893​
19.1​
7​
Chris Terreri
35​
0.89​
9.3​
Cunniff
1.01​
0.891​
10.4​
8​
Ken Wregget
51​
0.891​
16.6​
Holmgren
0.99​
0.891​
15.4​
9​
Bob Essensa
36​
0.891​
10.3​
Murdoch
0.97​
0.888​
7.0​
10​
Vincent Riendeau
43​
0.883​
2.3​
Sutter Bri
1.03​
0.886​
6.3​

1990-91:

RankGoalieGPSV%GSAACoachCoach RatingAdj SV%Adj GSAA
1​
Ed Belfour
74​
0.910​
44.6​
Keenan
0.97​
0.907​
39.9​
2​
Curtis Joseph
30​
0.898​
10.6​
Sutter Bri
1.03​
0.901​
13.0​
3​
Kelly Hrudey
47​
0.900​
18.6​
Webster
1.00​
0.900​
18.3​
4​
Andy Moog
51​
0.896​
13.0​
Milbury
1.03​
0.899​
16.8​
5​
Don Beaupre
45​
0.897​
11.8​
Murray T
1.00​
0.897​
12.2​
6
Patrick Roy
48
0.906
27.2
Burns P
0.90
0.895
12.7
7​
Vincent Riendeau
44​
0.892​
7.5​
Sutter Bri
1.03​
0.895​
11.1​
8​
Bob Essensa
55​
0.898​
17.5​
Murdoch
0.97​
0.895​
12.7​
9​
Mike Richter
45​
0.903​
23.7​
Neilson
0.92​
0.894​
11.8​
10​
Chris Terreri
53​
0.893​
9.6​
Cunniff
1.01​
0.894​
11.1​

1991-92:

RankGoalieGPSV%GSAACoachCoach RatingAdj SV%Adj GSAA
1​
Curtis Joseph
60​
0.910​
43.4​
Sutter Bri
1.03​
0.913​
48.2​
2​
Bob Essensa
47​
0.910​
31.4​
Paddock
1.02​
0.913​
34.4​
3
Patrick Roy
67
0.914
47.0
Burns P
0.90
0.904
29.4
4​
Kirk McLean
65​
0.901​
23.1​
Quinn P
1.02​
0.903​
26.3​
5​
Jeff Hackett
42​
0.892​
4.8​
Kingston
1.12​
0.903​
20.5​
6​
John Vanbiesbrouck
45​
0.910​
28.9​
Neilson
0.92​
0.902​
18.3​
7​
Kelly Hrudey
60​
0.897​
17.3​
Webster
1.00​
0.897​
16.9​
8​
Chris Terreri
54​
0.888​
0.0​
McVie
1.08​
0.897​
12.7​
9​
Andy Moog
62​
0.887​
-2.9​
Bowness
1.05​
0.892​
6.1​
10​
Mike Richter
41​
0.901​
15.8​
Neilson
0.92​
0.893​
5.3​

1992-93:

RankGoalieGPSV%GSAACoachCoach RatingAdj SV%Adj GSAA
1​
Curtis Joseph
68​
0.911​
57.4​
Berry
0.96​
0.907​
49.2​
2​
Ed Belfour
71​
0.906​
39.4​
Sutter Da
0.95​
0.901​
29.9​
3​
John Vanbiesbrouck
48​
0.900​
23.5​
Smith R
1.00​
0.900​
23.5​
4​
Felix Potvin
48​
0.910​
32.0​
Burns P
0.90​
0.900​
18.8​
5​
Arturs Irbe
36​
0.886​
1.9​
Kingston
1.12​
0.898​
17.0​
6​
Bob Essensa
67​
0.893​
16.9​
Paddock
1.02​
0.895​
22.3​
7​
Tommy Soderstrom
44​
0.892​
9.7​
Dineen B
1.03​
0.895​
13.6​
8​
Daren Puppa
32​
0.898​
12.0​
Muckler
0.96​
0.893​
7.9​
9
Patrick Roy
62
0.894
16.8
Demers
0.99
0.893
14.3
10​
Kay Whitmore
31​
0.890​
4.7​
Quinn P
1.02​
0.892​
6.5​

1993-94:

RankGoalieGPSV%GSAACoachCoach RatingAdj SV%Adj GSAA
1​
Dominik Hasek
58​
0.930​
53.9​
Muckler
0.960​
0.927​
49.3​
2​
John Vanbiesbrouck
57​
0.924​
55.6​
Neilson
0.919​
0.917​
42.8​
3
Patrick Roy
68
0.918
44.2
Demers
0.987
0.917
42.2
4​
Darcy Wakaluk
36​
0.910​
14.6​
Gainey
0.998​
0.910​
14.4​
5​
Mike Richter
68​
0.910​
25.5​
Keenan
0.973​
0.907​
21.0​
6​
Curtis Joseph
71​
0.911​
36.9​
Berry
0.960​
0.907​
28.0​
7​
Guy Hebert
52​
0.907​
17.8​
Wilson Ron
0.999​
0.907​
17.7​
8​
Martin Brodeur
47​
0.915​
24.9​
Lemaire
0.909​
0.907​
14.4​
9​
Sean Burke
47​
0.906​
16.0​
McGuire
1.000​
0.906​
16.0​
10​
Daren Puppa
63​
0.899​
6.8​
Crisp
1.036​
0.903​
12.5​

1994-95:

RankGoalieGPSV%GSAACoachCoach RatingAdj SV%Adj GSAA
1​
Dominik Hasek
41​
0.930​
36.4​
Muckler
0.960​
0.927​
32.8​
2​
Jocelyn Thibault
18​
0.917​
7.1​
Crawford
1.016​
0.919​
7.6​
3​
Jim Carey
28​
0.913​
8.0​
Schoenfeld
1.026​
0.915​
9.5​
4​
Andy Moog
31​
0.915​
12.1​
Gainey
0.998​
0.915​
11.9​
5​
Dominic Roussel
19​
0.914​
6.3​
Murray T
1.004​
0.914​
6.5​
6​
Sean Burke
42​
0.912​
14.6​
Holmgren
0.993​
0.912​
13.8​
7​
Stephane Fiset
32​
0.910​
9.2​
Crawford
1.016​
0.912​
10.6​
8​
Kirk McLean
40​
0.904​
4.3​
Ley
1.061​
0.910​
10.6​
9​
Kelly Hrudey
35​
0.910​
10.3​
Melrose
0.996​
0.910​
9.9​
10​
Chris Osgood
19​
0.917​
8.3​
Bowman
0.912​
0.909​
4.3​
14
Patrick Roy
43
0.906
7.9
Demers
0.987
0.905
6.3

1995-96:

RankGoalieGPSV%GSAACoachCoach RatingAdj SV%Adj GSAA
1​
Daren Puppa
57​
0.918​
32.0​
Crisp
1.04​
0.921​
36.6​
2​
Guy Hebert
59​
0.914​
27.9​
Wilson Ron
1.00​
0.914​
27.8​
3​
Ron Hextall
53​
0.913​
19.2​
Murray T
1.00​
0.914​
19.7​
4​
Dominik Hasek
59​
0.92​
43.3​
Nolan
0.92​
0.913​
29.7​
5
Patrick Roy
61
0.908
17.5
Crawford
1.02
0.910
20.1
6​
Jeff Hackett
35​
0.916​
16.3​
Hartsburg
0.93​
0.909​
10.4​
7​
Nikolai Khabibulin
53​
0.908​
16.2​
Simpson T
1.01​
0.909​
17.1​
8​
Jim Carey
71​
0.906​
12.7​
Schoenfeld
1.03​
0.909​
16.6​
9​
Mike Richter
41​
0.912​
17.0​
Campbell
0.96​
0.908​
12.2​
10​
Corey Hirsch
41​
0.903​
5.2​
Ley
1.06​
0.908​
11.7​

1996-97:

RankGoalieGPSV%GSAACoachCoach RatingAdj SV%Adj GSAA
1
Patrick Roy
62
0.923
34.3
Crawford
1.02
0.924
36.5
2​
Dominik Hasek
67​
0.930​
54.4​
Nolan
0.92​
0.924​
41.5​
3​
Jeff Hackett
41​
0.927​
26.5​
Hartsburg
0.93​
0.921​
19.9​
4​
Guy Hebert
67​
0.919​
31.2​
Wilson Ron
1.00​
0.919​
31.1​
5​
Martin Brodeur
67​
0.927​
35.6​
Lemaire
0.91​
0.919​
23.5​
6​
John Vanbiesbrouck
57​
0.919​
22.7​
MacLean D
0.97​
0.917​
19.3​
7​
Patrick Lalime
39​
0.913​
10.1​
Johnston E
1.01​
0.915​
11.6​
8​
Sean Burke
51​
0.914​
14.6​
Maurice
1.00​
0.914​
14.3​
9​
Mike Richter
61​
0.917​
24.3​
Campbell
0.96​
0.914​
17.1​
10​
Curtis Joseph
72​
0.907​
4.3​
Low
1.08​
0.913​
18.6​

1997-98:

RankGoalieGPSV%GSAACoachCoach RatingAdj SV%Adj GSAA
1​
Dominik Hasek
72​
0.932​
54.5​
Ruff
0.99​
0.931​
53.0​
2​
Tom Barrasso
63​
0.922​
23.9​
Constantine
1.03​
0.924​
27.4​
3​
Trevor Kidd
47​
0.922​
19.0​
Maurice
1.00​
0.921​
18.8​
4​
Olaf Kolzig
64​
0.920​
23.1​
Wilson Ron
1.00​
0.920​
23.0​
5
Patrick Roy
65
0.916
18.1
Crawford
1.02
0.917
20.5
6​
Ed Belfour
61​
0.916​
13.2​
Hitchcock
0.98​
0.914​
11.0​
7​
Curtis Joseph
71​
0.905​
-2.8​
Low
1.08​
0.912​
10.2​
8​
Jeff Hackett
58​
0.917​
16.5​
Hartsburg
0.93​
0.911​
7.2​
9​
Ron Hextall
46​
0.911​
5.1​
Cashman
1.00​
0.911​
5.1​
10​
Felix Potvin
67​
0.906​
0.5​
Murphy
1.05​
0.911​
8.6​

1998-99:

RankGoalieGPSV%GSAACoachCoach RatingAdj SV%Adj GSAA
1​
Dominik Hasek
64​
0.937​
54.1​
Ruff
0.99​
0.936​
52.9​
2​
Nikolai Khabibulin
63​
0.923​
25.0​
Schoenfeld
1.03​
0.925​
28.4​
3​
Ron Tugnutt
43​
0.925​
17.7​
Martin
0.99​
0.925​
16.8​
4​
Arturs Irbe
62​
0.923​
26.6​
Maurice
1.00​
0.923​
26.3​
5
Patrick Roy
61
0.917
15.3
Hartley
1.02
0.918
17.6
6​
Byron Dafoe
68​
0.926​
33.0​
Burns P
0.90​
0.918​
17.9​
7​
Steve Shields
37​
0.921​
13.2​
Sutter Da
0.95​
0.917​
9.0​
8​
Guy Hebert
69​
0.922​
29.9​
Hartsburg
0.93​
0.916​
17.7​
9​
Ed Belfour
61​
0.915​
9.6​
Hitchcock
0.98​
0.913​
7.3​
10​
Stephane Fiset
42​
0.915​
8.2​
Robinson
0.98​
0.913​
5.8​

1999-00:

RankGoalieGPSV%GSAACoachCoach RatingAdj SV%Adj GSAA
1​
Dominik Hasek
35​
0.919​
13.6​
Ruff
0.99​
0.918​
12.8​
2​
Jean-Sebastien Aubin
51​
0.914​
13.1​
Brooks
1.05​
0.918​
18.8​
3​
Ed Belfour
62​
0.919​
23.2​
Hitchcock
0.98​
0.918​
20.7​
4​
Mike Vernon
49​
0.917​
16.9​
Murray T
1.00​
0.917​
17.4​
5​
Olaf Kolzig
73​
0.917​
24.1​
Wilson Ron
1.00​
0.917​
24.0​
6​
Curtis Joseph
63​
0.915​
19.3​
Quinn P
1.02​
0.916​
22.2​
7
Patrick Roy
63
0.914
15.8
Hartley
1.02
0.915
18.2
8​
Martin Brodeur
72​
0.91​
10.8​
Ftorek
1.06​
0.915​
19.4​
9​
Jose Theodore
30​
0.919​
10.6​
Vigneault
0.95​
0.915​
7.5​
10​
Roman Turek
67​
0.912​
11.5​
Quenneville
1.02​
0.914​
14.0​

2000-01:

RankGoalieGPSV%GSAACoachCoach RatingAdj SV%Adj GSAA
1​
Dominik Hasek
67​
0.921​
30.0​
Ruff
0.99​
0.920​
28.6​
2​
Sean Burke
62​
0.922​
32.9​
Francis B
0.97​
0.919​
28.2​
3​
Mike Dunham
48​
0.923​
26.6​
Trotz
0.94​
0.918​
19.7​
4​
Roman Cechmanek
59​
0.921​
26.6​
Barber
0.95​
0.917​
20.4​
5​
Roberto Luongo
47​
0.920​
22.0​
Sutter Du
0.97​
0.917​
18.5​
6​
Ron Tugnutt
53​
0.917​
20.8​
King Dave
1.00​
0.917​
20.8​
7​
Curtis Joseph
68​
0.915​
21.5​
Quinn P
1.02​
0.916​
24.5​
8​
Jean-Sebastien Giguere
34​
0.911​
7.4​
Charron
1.04​
0.914​
10.9​
9
Patrick Roy
62
0.913
14.4
Hartley
1.02
0.914
16.6
10​
Patrick Lalime
60​
0.914​
17.7​
Martin
0.99​
0.913​
16.0​

2001-02:

RankGoalieGPSV%GSAACoachCoach RatingAdj SV%Adj GSAA
1​
Jose Theodore
67​
0.931​
45.9​
Therrien
0.96​
0.928​
39.8​
2
Patrick Roy
63
0.925
28.3
Hartley
1.02
0.926
30.4
3​
Nikolai Khabibulin
70​
0.920​
23.6​
Tortorella
1.01​
0.921​
24.6​
4​
Marty Turco
31​
0.921​
8.8​
Hitchcock
0.98​
0.919​
7.8​
5​
Milan Hnilicka
60​
0.908​
1.4​
Fraser
1.12​
0.919​
21.2​
6​
Sean Burke
60​
0.920​
20.8​
Francis B
0.97​
0.917​
16.2​
7​
Roman Cechmanek
46​
0.921​
15.3​
Barber
0.95​
0.917​
10.5​
8​
Jean-Sebastien Giguere
53​
0.920​
16.7​
Murray Bry
0.96​
0.916​
11.9​
9​
Tommy Salo
69​
0.913​
9.0​
MacTavish
1.03​
0.915​
13.1​
10​
Martin Biron
72​
0.915​
13.3​
Ruff
0.99​
0.914​
11.8​

2002-03:

RankGoalieGPSV%GSAACoachCoach RatingAdj SV%Adj GSAA
1​
Marty Turco
55​
0.932​
31.9​
Tippett
0.98​
0.931​
30.2​
2​
Roman Cechmanek
58​
0.925​
22.7​
Hitchcock
0.98​
0.924​
20.7​
3​
Ed Belfour
62​
0.922​
24.6​
Quinn P
1.02​
0.924​
27.1​
4
Patrick Roy
63
0.92
20.1
Granato T
0.99
0.920
19.1
5​
Dwayne Roloson
50​
0.927​
23.6​
Lemaire
0.91​
0.919​
13.8​
6​
Jean-Sebastien Giguere
65​
0.92​
20.9​
Babcock
0.99​
0.919​
18.7​
7​
Garth Snow
43​
0.918​
10.1​
Laviolette
1.01​
0.918​
10.8​
8​
Jocelyn Thibault
62​
0.915​
10.1​
Sutter Bri
1.03​
0.917​
14.0​
9​
Manny Fernandez
35​
0.924​
14.6​
Lemaire
0.91​
0.916​
7.2​
10​
Roberto Luongo
65​
0.918​
19.3​
Keenan
0.97​
0.916​
14.8​

And of course we can quibble with some of the different coaching ratings or individuals that are ranked here or there. But I'm not sure Roy's results are that far out of place, in aggregate. That's still obviously a very consistently elite goalie (1-2-2-3-3-3-4-4-5-5-5-6-7-9-9 in save percentage finishes in a 21-30 team league is absolutely an elite inner-tier performance), but the dominant finishes relative to the rest of the league mostly go away (you can maybe still give him credit for 1989-90, since Liut didn't have a lot of GP and may be getting an overly favourable adjustment there).

Elite consistency but not necessarily peaking way ahead of everyone else? To me, that looks a lot like Jacques Plante, to be honest.

On the other hand, Dominik Hasek still has six save percentage titles in this adjusted scenario (as many as Roy has top-3 finishes), and a couple of his peak seasons do look much closer to the pack based on these adjustments, but he still has four years where he obliterates the competition in a way that probably no other goalie ever has (and he did it against a global talent pool that included elite Americans and Europeans). That's why he's my #1, then Plante, then Roy.
 
Last edited:

Michael Farkas

Celebrate 68
Jun 28, 2006
14,879
10,308
NYC
www.youtube.com
Plante was the Hart trophy winner in their record 5th consecutive year. Boom Boom won it the year before. Beliveau was a candidate to win it again. Harvey, Richard...

Plante was dead in Hart voting every other year of his career except a late one in Toronto. Plante was not a regular candidate for MVP, but got it suddenly out of the blue, at the tail end of the Habs 5-year dynasty (coincidentally a famous Canadian children's book was popular).
He did not get it "out of the blue", it was the first year without the best d-man of all time in front of him...and Plante had one of the best years of his career.

Plante received scant consideration in 1959 (2nd among goalies). Also received some weak consideration in '63 as well.
 

MXD

Partying Hard
Oct 27, 2005
51,727
17,626
There's been a lot of talk about Patrick Roy's elite save percentage results, his number of times leading the league and so on.

I wanted to see how they look after adjusting for coaching, so for all of Roy's seasons from 1986-87 to 2002-03 I used my coaching ratings (and nothing else, these are all the raw ratings with no adjustments) on every goalie season with at least 30 GP, and then ranked them by save percentage.

1986-87 (edited - first table posted had an error):

RankGoalieGPSV%GSAACoachCoach RatingAdj SV%Adj GSAA
1​
Ron Hextall
66​
0.902​
41.8​
Keenan
0.97​
0.899​
36.5​
2​
Daniel Berthiaume
31​
0.885​
4.2​
Maloney D
1.07​
0.893​
10.4​
3​
Glen Hanlon
36​
0.893​
13.1​
Demers
0.99​
0.892​
11.7​
4​
Allan Bester
36​
0.889​
8.7​
Brophy
1.02​
0.891​
11.3​
5​
Mark LaForest
5​
0.892​
1.3​
Demers
0.99​
0.891​
1.2​
6​
Mario Gosselin
30​
0.886​
4.7​
Bergeron
1.03​
0.889​
7.0​
7​
Pokey Reddick
48​
0.881​
1.7​
Maloney D
1.07​
0.889​
11.6​
8​
Bob Froese
31​
0.885​
4.8​
Esposito
1.03​
0.889​
7.9​
9​
Brian Hayward
37​
0.893​
13.0​
Perron
0.95​
0.888​
7.7​
10​
Mike Liut
59​
0.885​
7.9​
Evans
1.03​
0.888​
12.9​
14
Patrick Roy
46
0.891
13.9
Perron
0.95
0.886
7.1

1987-88:

RankGoalieGPSV%GSAACoachCoach RatingAdj SV%Adj GSAA
1​
Kelly Hrudey
54​
0.896​
23.3​
Simpson T
1.01​
0.896​
24.2​
2​
Greg Stefan
33​
0.896​
14.9​
Demers
0.99​
0.895​
13.7​
3
Patrick Roy
45
0.900
25.0
Perron
0.95
0.895
18.5
4​
Tom Barrasso
54​
0.896​
26.2​
Sator
0.99​
0.894​
24.2​
5​
Billy Smith
38​
0.894​
14.6​
Simpson T
1.01​
0.894​
15.3​
6​
Pete Peeters
35​
0.898​
16.1​
Murray Bry
0.96​
0.894​
12.3​
7​
John Vanbiesbrouck
56​
0.890​
17.3​
Bergeron
1.03​
0.893​
22.2​
8​
Brian Hayward
39​
0.896​
17.0​
Perron
0.95​
0.891​
11.5​
9​
Daniel Berthiaume
56​
0.882​
2.9​
Maloney D
1.07​
0.890​
14.6​
10​
Glen Hanlon
47​
0.891​
14.3​
Demers
0.99​
0.889​
12.5​

1988-89:

RankGoalieGPSV%GSAACoachCoach RatingAdj SV%Adj GSAA
1​
Jon Casey
55​
0.900​
31.1​
Page
1.01​
0.901​
32.8​
2​
Mike Vernon
52​
0.897​
22.7​
Crisp
1.04​
0.901​
27.2​
3​
Kari Takko
32​
0.899​
17.9​
Page
1.01​
0.900​
19.0​
4
Patrick Roy
48
0.908
35.2
Burns P
0.90
0.897
22.4
5​
Peter Sidorkiewicz
44​
0.890​
12.8​
Pleau
1.02​
0.892​
15.5​
6​
Steve Weeks
35​
0.892​
12.4​
McCammon
1.00​
0.892​
11.9​
7​
Kirk McLean
42​
0.891​
14.0​
McCammon
1.00​
0.891​
13.4​
8​
Ron Hextall
64​
0.891​
22.3​
Holmgren
0.99​
0.890​
20.8​
9​
Alan Bester
43​
0.890​
15.1​
Armstrong
1.00​
0.890​
15.1​
10​
Daren Puppa
37​
0.889​
9.1​
Sator
0.99​
0.887​
7.8​

1989-90:

RankGoalieGPSV%GSAACoachCoach RatingAdj SV%Adj GSAA
1​
Mike Liut
37​
0.905​
23.0​
Ley
1.06​
0.910​
28.2​
2
Patrick Roy
54
0.912
47.4
Burns P
0.90
0.902
32.2
3​
Jon Casey
61​
0.896​
25.9​
Page
1.01​
0.897​
28.0​
4​
Andy Moog
46​
0.893​
14.5​
Milbury
1.03​
0.896​
17.9​
5​
Rejean Lemelin
43​
0.892​
11.2​
Milbury
1.03​
0.895​
14.2​
6​
Daren Puppa
56​
0.903​
35.7​
Dudley
0.90​
0.893​
19.1​
7​
Chris Terreri
35​
0.89​
9.3​
Cunniff
1.01​
0.891​
10.4​
8​
Ken Wregget
51​
0.891​
16.6​
Holmgren
0.99​
0.891​
15.4​
9​
Bob Essensa
36​
0.891​
10.3​
Murdoch
0.97​
0.888​
7.0​
10​
Vincent Riendeau
43​
0.883​
2.3​
Sutter Bri
1.03​
0.886​
6.3​

1990-91:

RankGoalieGPSV%GSAACoachCoach RatingAdj SV%Adj GSAA
1​
Ed Belfour
74​
0.910​
44.6​
Keenan
0.97​
0.907​
39.9​
2​
Curtis Joseph
30​
0.898​
10.6​
Sutter Bri
1.03​
0.901​
13.0​
3​
Kelly Hrudey
47​
0.900​
18.6​
Webster
1.00​
0.900​
18.3​
4​
Andy Moog
51​
0.896​
13.0​
Milbury
1.03​
0.899​
16.8​
5​
Don Beaupre
45​
0.897​
11.8​
Murray T
1.00​
0.897​
12.2​
6
Patrick Roy
48
0.906
27.2
Burns P
0.90
0.895
12.7
7​
Vincent Riendeau
44​
0.892​
7.5​
Sutter Bri
1.03​
0.895​
11.1​
8​
Bob Essensa
55​
0.898​
17.5​
Murdoch
0.97​
0.895​
12.7​
9​
Mike Richter
45​
0.903​
23.7​
Neilson
0.92​
0.894​
11.8​
10​
Chris Terreri
53​
0.893​
9.6​
Cunniff
1.01​
0.894​
11.1​

1991-92:

RankGoalieGPSV%GSAACoachCoach RatingAdj SV%Adj GSAA
1​
Curtis Joseph
60​
0.910​
43.4​
Sutter Bri
1.03​
0.913​
48.2​
2​
Bob Essensa
47​
0.910​
31.4​
Paddock
1.02​
0.913​
34.4​
3
Patrick Roy
67
0.914
47.0
Burns P
0.90
0.904
29.4
4​
Kirk McLean
65​
0.901​
23.1​
Quinn P
1.02​
0.903​
26.3​
5​
Jeff Hackett
42​
0.892​
4.8​
Kingston
1.12​
0.903​
20.5​
6​
John Vanbiesbrouck
45​
0.910​
28.9​
Neilson
0.92​
0.902​
18.3​
7​
Kelly Hrudey
60​
0.897​
17.3​
Webster
1.00​
0.897​
16.9​
8​
Chris Terreri
54​
0.888​
0.0​
McVie
1.08​
0.897​
12.7​
9​
Andy Moog
62​
0.887​
-2.9​
Bowness
1.05​
0.892​
6.1​
10​
Mike Richter
41​
0.901​
15.8​
Neilson
0.92​
0.893​
5.3​

1992-93:

RankGoalieGPSV%GSAACoachCoach RatingAdj SV%Adj GSAA
1​
Curtis Joseph
68​
0.911​
57.4​
Berry
0.96​
0.907​
49.2​
2​
Ed Belfour
71​
0.906​
39.4​
Sutter Da
0.95​
0.901​
29.9​
3​
John Vanbiesbrouck
48​
0.900​
23.5​
Smith R
1.00​
0.900​
23.5​
4​
Felix Potvin
48​
0.910​
32.0​
Burns P
0.90​
0.900​
18.8​
5​
Arturs Irbe
36​
0.886​
1.9​
Kingston
1.12​
0.898​
17.0​
6​
Bob Essensa
67​
0.893​
16.9​
Paddock
1.02​
0.895​
22.3​
7​
Tommy Soderstrom
44​
0.892​
9.7​
Dineen B
1.03​
0.895​
13.6​
8​
Daren Puppa
32​
0.898​
12.0​
Muckler
0.96​
0.893​
7.9​
9
Patrick Roy
62
0.894
16.8
Demers
0.99
0.893
14.3
10​
Kay Whitmore
31​
0.890​
4.7​
Quinn P
1.02​
0.892​
6.5​

1993-94:

RankGoalieGPSV%GSAACoachCoach RatingAdj SV%Adj GSAA
1​
Dominik Hasek
58​
0.930​
53.9​
Muckler
0.960​
0.927​
49.3​
2​
John Vanbiesbrouck
57​
0.924​
55.6​
Neilson
0.919​
0.917​
42.8​
3
Patrick Roy
68
0.918
44.2
Demers
0.987
0.917
42.2
4​
Darcy Wakaluk
36​
0.910​
14.6​
Gainey
0.998​
0.910​
14.4​
5​
Mike Richter
68​
0.910​
25.5​
Keenan
0.973​
0.907​
21.0​
6​
Curtis Joseph
71​
0.911​
36.9​
Berry
0.960​
0.907​
28.0​
7​
Guy Hebert
52​
0.907​
17.8​
Wilson Ron
0.999​
0.907​
17.7​
8​
Martin Brodeur
47​
0.915​
24.9​
Lemaire
0.909​
0.907​
14.4​
9​
Sean Burke
47​
0.906​
16.0​
McGuire
1.000​
0.906​
16.0​
10​
Daren Puppa
63​
0.899​
6.8​
Crisp
1.036​
0.903​
12.5​

1994-95:

RankGoalieGPSV%GSAACoachCoach RatingAdj SV%Adj GSAA
1​
Dominik Hasek
41​
0.930​
36.4​
Muckler
0.960​
0.927​
32.8​
2​
Jocelyn Thibault
18​
0.917​
7.1​
Crawford
1.016​
0.919​
7.6​
3​
Jim Carey
28​
0.913​
8.0​
Schoenfeld
1.026​
0.915​
9.5​
4​
Andy Moog
31​
0.915​
12.1​
Gainey
0.998​
0.915​
11.9​
5​
Dominic Roussel
19​
0.914​
6.3​
Murray T
1.004​
0.914​
6.5​
6​
Sean Burke
42​
0.912​
14.6​
Holmgren
0.993​
0.912​
13.8​
7​
Stephane Fiset
32​
0.910​
9.2​
Crawford
1.016​
0.912​
10.6​
8​
Kirk McLean
40​
0.904​
4.3​
Ley
1.061​
0.910​
10.6​
9​
Kelly Hrudey
35​
0.910​
10.3​
Melrose
0.996​
0.910​
9.9​
10​
Chris Osgood
19​
0.917​
8.3​
Bowman
0.912​
0.909​
4.3​
14
Patrick Roy
43
0.906
7.9
Demers
0.987
0.905
6.3

1995-96:

RankGoalieGPSV%GSAACoachCoach RatingAdj SV%Adj GSAA
1​
Daren Puppa
57​
0.918​
32.0​
Crisp
1.04​
0.921​
36.6​
2​
Guy Hebert
59​
0.914​
27.9​
Wilson Ron
1.00​
0.914​
27.8​
3​
Ron Hextall
53​
0.913​
19.2​
Murray T
1.00​
0.914​
19.7​
4​
Dominik Hasek
59​
0.92​
43.3​
Nolan
0.92​
0.913​
29.7​
5
Patrick Roy
61
0.908
17.5
Crawford
1.02
0.910
20.1
6​
Jeff Hackett
35​
0.916​
16.3​
Hartsburg
0.93​
0.909​
10.4​
7​
Nikolai Khabibulin
53​
0.908​
16.2​
Simpson T
1.01​
0.909​
17.1​
8​
Jim Carey
71​
0.906​
12.7​
Schoenfeld
1.03​
0.909​
16.6​
9​
Mike Richter
41​
0.912​
17.0​
Campbell
0.96​
0.908​
12.2​
10​
Corey Hirsch
41​
0.903​
5.2​
Ley
1.06​
0.908​
11.7​

1996-97:

RankGoalieGPSV%GSAACoachCoach RatingAdj SV%Adj GSAA
1
Patrick Roy
62
0.923
34.3
Crawford
1.02
0.924
36.5
2​
Dominik Hasek
67​
0.930​
54.4​
Nolan
0.92​
0.924​
41.5​
3​
Jeff Hackett
41​
0.927​
26.5​
Hartsburg
0.93​
0.921​
19.9​
4​
Guy Hebert
67​
0.919​
31.2​
Wilson Ron
1.00​
0.919​
31.1​
5​
Martin Brodeur
67​
0.927​
35.6​
Lemaire
0.91​
0.919​
23.5​
6​
John Vanbiesbrouck
57​
0.919​
22.7​
MacLean D
0.97​
0.917​
19.3​
7​
Patrick Lalime
39​
0.913​
10.1​
Johnston E
1.01​
0.915​
11.6​
8​
Sean Burke
51​
0.914​
14.6​
Maurice
1.00​
0.914​
14.3​
9​
Mike Richter
61​
0.917​
24.3​
Campbell
0.96​
0.914​
17.1​
10​
Curtis Joseph
72​
0.907​
4.3​
Low
1.08​
0.913​
18.6​

1997-98:

RankGoalieGPSV%GSAACoachCoach RatingAdj SV%Adj GSAA
1​
Dominik Hasek
72​
0.932​
54.5​
Ruff
0.99​
0.931​
53.0​
2​
Tom Barrasso
63​
0.922​
23.9​
Constantine
1.03​
0.924​
27.4​
3​
Trevor Kidd
47​
0.922​
19.0​
Maurice
1.00​
0.921​
18.8​
4​
Olaf Kolzig
64​
0.920​
23.1​
Wilson Ron
1.00​
0.920​
23.0​
5
Patrick Roy
65
0.916
18.1
Crawford
1.02
0.917
20.5
6​
Ed Belfour
61​
0.916​
13.2​
Hitchcock
0.98​
0.914​
11.0​
7​
Curtis Joseph
71​
0.905​
-2.8​
Low
1.08​
0.912​
10.2​
8​
Jeff Hackett
58​
0.917​
16.5​
Hartsburg
0.93​
0.911​
7.2​
9​
Ron Hextall
46​
0.911​
5.1​
Cashman
1.00​
0.911​
5.1​
10​
Felix Potvin
67​
0.906​
0.5​
Murphy
1.05​
0.911​
8.6​

1998-99:

RankGoalieGPSV%GSAACoachCoach RatingAdj SV%Adj GSAA
1​
Dominik Hasek
64​
0.937​
54.1​
Ruff
0.99​
0.936​
52.9​
2​
Nikolai Khabibulin
63​
0.923​
25.0​
Schoenfeld
1.03​
0.925​
28.4​
3​
Ron Tugnutt
43​
0.925​
17.7​
Martin
0.99​
0.925​
16.8​
4​
Arturs Irbe
62​
0.923​
26.6​
Maurice
1.00​
0.923​
26.3​
5
Patrick Roy
61
0.917
15.3
Hartley
1.02
0.918
17.6
6​
Byron Dafoe
68​
0.926​
33.0​
Burns P
0.90​
0.918​
17.9​
7​
Steve Shields
37​
0.921​
13.2​
Sutter Da
0.95​
0.917​
9.0​
8​
Guy Hebert
69​
0.922​
29.9​
Hartsburg
0.93​
0.916​
17.7​
9​
Ed Belfour
61​
0.915​
9.6​
Hitchcock
0.98​
0.913​
7.3​
10​
Stephane Fiset
42​
0.915​
8.2​
Robinson
0.98​
0.913​
5.8​

1999-00:

RankGoalieGPSV%GSAACoachCoach RatingAdj SV%Adj GSAA
1​
Dominik Hasek
35​
0.919​
13.6​
Ruff
0.99​
0.918​
12.8​
2​
Jean-Sebastien Aubin
51​
0.914​
13.1​
Brooks
1.05​
0.918​
18.8​
3​
Ed Belfour
62​
0.919​
23.2​
Hitchcock
0.98​
0.918​
20.7​
4​
Mike Vernon
49​
0.917​
16.9​
Murray T
1.00​
0.917​
17.4​
5​
Olaf Kolzig
73​
0.917​
24.1​
Wilson Ron
1.00​
0.917​
24.0​
6​
Curtis Joseph
63​
0.915​
19.3​
Quinn P
1.02​
0.916​
22.2​
7
Patrick Roy
63
0.914
15.8
Hartley
1.02
0.915
18.2
8​
Martin Brodeur
72​
0.91​
10.8​
Ftorek
1.06​
0.915​
19.4​
9​
Jose Theodore
30​
0.919​
10.6​
Vigneault
0.95​
0.915​
7.5​
10​
Roman Turek
67​
0.912​
11.5​
Quenneville
1.02​
0.914​
14.0​

2000-01:

RankGoalieGPSV%GSAACoachCoach RatingAdj SV%Adj GSAA
1​
Dominik Hasek
67​
0.921​
30.0​
Ruff
0.99​
0.920​
28.6​
2​
Sean Burke
62​
0.922​
32.9​
Francis B
0.97​
0.919​
28.2​
3​
Mike Dunham
48​
0.923​
26.6​
Trotz
0.94​
0.918​
19.7​
4​
Roman Cechmanek
59​
0.921​
26.6​
Barber
0.95​
0.917​
20.4​
5​
Roberto Luongo
47​
0.920​
22.0​
Sutter Du
0.97​
0.917​
18.5​
6​
Ron Tugnutt
53​
0.917​
20.8​
King Dave
1.00​
0.917​
20.8​
7​
Curtis Joseph
68​
0.915​
21.5​
Quinn P
1.02​
0.916​
24.5​
8​
Jean-Sebastien Giguere
34​
0.911​
7.4​
Charron
1.04​
0.914​
10.9​
9
Patrick Roy
62
0.913
14.4
Hartley
1.02
0.914
16.6
10​
Patrick Lalime
60​
0.914​
17.7​
Martin
0.99​
0.913​
16.0​

2001-02:

RankGoalieGPSV%GSAACoachCoach RatingAdj SV%Adj GSAA
1​
Jose Theodore
67​
0.931​
45.9​
Therrien
0.96​
0.928​
39.8​
2
Patrick Roy
63
0.925
28.3
Hartley
1.02
0.926
30.4
3​
Nikolai Khabibulin
70​
0.920​
23.6​
Tortorella
1.01​
0.921​
24.6​
4​
Marty Turco
31​
0.921​
8.8​
Hitchcock
0.98​
0.919​
7.8​
5​
Milan Hnilicka
60​
0.908​
1.4​
Fraser
1.12​
0.919​
21.2​
6​
Sean Burke
60​
0.920​
20.8​
Francis B
0.97​
0.917​
16.2​
7​
Roman Cechmanek
46​
0.921​
15.3​
Barber
0.95​
0.917​
10.5​
8​
Jean-Sebastien Giguere
53​
0.920​
16.7​
Murray Bry
0.96​
0.916​
11.9​
9​
Tommy Salo
69​
0.913​
9.0​
MacTavish
1.03​
0.915​
13.1​
10​
Martin Biron
72​
0.915​
13.3​
Ruff
0.99​
0.914​
11.8​

2002-03:

RankGoalieGPSV%GSAACoachCoach RatingAdj SV%Adj GSAA
1​
Marty Turco
55​
0.932​
31.9​
Tippett
0.98​
0.931​
30.2​
2​
Roman Cechmanek
58​
0.925​
22.7​
Hitchcock
0.98​
0.924​
20.7​
3​
Ed Belfour
62​
0.922​
24.6​
Quinn P
1.02​
0.924​
27.1​
4
Patrick Roy
63
0.92
20.1
Granato T
0.99
0.920
19.1
5​
Dwayne Roloson
50​
0.927​
23.6​
Lemaire
0.91​
0.919​
13.8​
6​
Jean-Sebastien Giguere
65​
0.92​
20.9​
Babcock
0.99​
0.919​
18.7​
7​
Garth Snow
43​
0.918​
10.1​
Laviolette
1.01​
0.918​
10.8​
8​
Jocelyn Thibault
62​
0.915​
10.1​
Sutter Bri
1.03​
0.917​
14.0​
9​
Manny Fernandez
35​
0.924​
14.6​
Lemaire
0.91​
0.916​
7.2​
10​
Roberto Luongo
65​
0.918​
19.3​
Keenan
0.97​
0.916​
14.8​

And of course we can quibble with some of the different coaching ratings or individuals that are ranked here or there. But I'm not sure Roy's results are that far out of place, in aggregate. That's still obviously a very consistently elite goalie (1-2-2-3-3-3-4-4-5-5-5-6-7-9-9 in save percentage finishes in a 21-30 team league is absolutely an elite inner-tier performance), but the dominant finishes relative to the rest of the league mostly go away (you can maybe still give him credit for 1989-90, since Liut didn't have a lot of GP and may be getting an overly favourable adjustment there).

Elite consistency but not necessarily peaking way ahead of everyone else? To me, that looks a lot like Jacques Plante, to be honest.

On the other hand, Dominik Hasek still has six save percentage titles in this adjusted scenario (as many as Roy has top-3 finishes), and a couple of his peak seasons do look much closer to the pack based on these adjustments, but he still has four years where he obliterates the competition in a way that probably no other goalie ever has (and he did it against a global talent pool that included elite Americans and Europeans). That's why he's my #1, then Plante, then Roy.
... I'll be very blunt.

If Jean Perron has a downward effect on your model-adjusted GSAA percentage, take your model, and throw it in the trash.

... Wait, Jean Perron has a BIGGER downward effect on netminder's GSAA than Ken Hitchcock?... ... Then take the trash, on throw it on the model.
 
Last edited:

VanIslander

20 years of All-Time Drafts on HfBoards
Sep 4, 2004
36,163
6,849
South Korea
Hasek was drafted in 1983 by Chicago but it wasn't until the fall of the Soviet Union that he could take his wares west. Tretiak, the Chicago goalie coach, was asked why he was spending so much time with Belfour but not with Hasek, and he aptly replied: He doesn't do anything that i teach. :) He throws away his stick, he goes to one side and dares shooters to go for the gap, he turns his back to the play, he surges to the blueline... his reflexes, anticipation, strategic thinking and hand-eye coordination were elite, unconventional and repeatedly effective. The fool could stop pucks.

 
  • Like
Reactions: Sentinel

Weztex

Registered User
Feb 6, 2006
3,138
3,833
I really struggle juggling with Sawchuk. I still have so many questions but mostly, are we romanticizing him and if yes, to what extent?

75-80% of his legacy/appreciation seems to come from his dominant 5 years with the Wings. Yet, we also have Bowman saying how Detroit boasted the best defensive squad in the league during that time. How impactful was it on the perception people had?

We have Beliveau giving him praise but it's worth noting that Sawchuk was the best goalie in the league when Beliveau came along. Does that result in him making a bigger impression?

We've also shown that passed age 25, his body of work is significantly outclassed by Plante and Hall. Hall having almost double the elite seasons Sawchuk had, are his playoff resume and peak that worse than he definitely ranks him behind?

And the one I hate to bring up (but have to), how does his tragic death weights in on the abundance of quotes we can found about him? Don't get me wrong, Sawchuk was at one point the best goalie ever. But does him passing while still being active gave us a lot more tributes and positive comments from players/staff reminiscing about him that we would have otherwise? In other words, was he called the greatest ever as often in 1969 as he was in 1971? I know the question is blunt, but since we're working with a lot of quotes from that era, I think it's a legitimate one.
 
Last edited:

Michael Farkas

Celebrate 68
Jun 28, 2006
14,879
10,308
NYC
www.youtube.com
Didn't want to lose sight of this...

The Ottawa Journal - Oct 9 1952 said:
"Don't even mention sale when it comes to Bower. We just don't talk about sales where he is concerned. I've said it before, and I say it again, that there are only two goalies in all hockey who might be better than Bower."

"Well, go ahead and name them," countered T.P.

"Terry Sawchuk", answered Lex Cook.

Then Lex paused and said,: "I'll do better. Just Sawchuk. After that it's Bower and he'll run Terry a real close second. He's not for sale and neither is anybody else on the Cleveland club. We're through raising hockey players for the National League. We're a big league city and we're keeping it that way."
 

MXD

Partying Hard
Oct 27, 2005
51,727
17,626
Didn't want to lose sight of this...
At that point, Frank Brimsek was retired, Jacques Plante had never set foot out of Québec, Glenn Hall was all of 20 years old spending his first season in the AHL (where he appeared to not have done THAT great, but that was a team icing a very positively ancient Ott Heller as a regular on D). Meaning, they aren't in the comparison here, or at least not-meaningfully.

So... Basically, for our purposes, that means Terry Sawchuk was superior to a very old Turk Broda, Gerry McNeil, Al Rollins and the likes, and if that was in question, we probably shouldn't have been discussing Sawchuk this round.

As for Bower, well, it could mean something... It could also mean he was, at his peak, better than all those guys. Which is probably not super controversial. But it's a reminder that his career doesn't start in 1958.
 
Last edited:

Weztex

Registered User
Feb 6, 2006
3,138
3,833
Didn't want to lose sight of this...
I don't think anyone here is doubting Sawchuk as the best goalie on earth in 1952, if that's what you're implying. As MXD said, the first half of the 50's weren't the heydays of goaltending.
 

Vilica

Registered User
Jun 1, 2014
496
576
I have a bit of a random question regarding the 1st half/2nd half voting - do we know when the cutoffs were/when the votes were done? Was it the same time each year, or did it move? I'm guessing that it was around the new year, splitting the season in half.

The problem I have with counting votes (though I give them credibility) is that there's no depth of competition. Ignore the names and just look at the stats, and there's a whole lot of ordinary 35 game samples that received the most votes in a half (though they were the best of the 6 goalie-seasons).
 

bobholly39

Registered User
Mar 10, 2013
23,425
16,829
Coming into this first vote, here's what I felt very strongly about:

- Roy/Hasek definitely top 2 in some order
- Plante the only other goalie with a case for #1 - but, less strong, and so likely #3
- Tretiak/Dryden as bottom 2 in some order

None of the above changed for me 2 weeks later, and it's how I ended up voting. I think for me, it's Hall/Sawchuk/Brodeur who had the most room for movement in this round, and I did consider a lot of different rankings before voting yesterday. I'm very eager to see how their final rankings end up.

I kind of expect 6 goalies to be voted in round 1 - I suspect Dryden/Tretiak are far behind the other 6, and are the only 2 to make it to round 2.

Hoping we got a good turnout of voters for the first one.
 

Michael Farkas

Celebrate 68
Jun 28, 2006
14,879
10,308
NYC
www.youtube.com
I don't think anyone here is doubting Sawchuk as the best goalie on earth in 1952, if that's what you're implying. As MXD said, the first half of the 50's weren't the heydays of goaltending.
Certainly not. And like MXD said, it's sort of lower point of goaltending. But it also takes some steam out of "well, Bower was still probably the 6th or 7th best goalie in the world" - it was probably much better than that the whole time and he was restrained. He's the best non-NHL goalie ever through expansion, right? In case, his extended AHL time gives folks any pause when the time comes...
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad