I think that would absolutely work for the Flyers, presuming you mean pick #13 this year.UPL + 1st for Hart
Do you remember when he won the Selke?I remember when Couts was going to be a Selke contender
Do you remember when he won the Selke?
2019-20 NHL Awards Voting | Hockey-Reference.com
www.hockey-reference.com
Apart from those three years where that did happen.Yeah I phrased that funny. He was supposed to be an annual contender and he obviously never had that happen.
Probably more like Konecny + Laughton + Cutter Gauthier ++. Marner is one of the best players in the league, let’s be real here.As a base (WHICH MEANS THERE MAY BE ADDS ON EITHER SIDE)
Konecny, Laughton, Hart
for
Marner
Philly flips Marner @50%. Could get a real good package for that.
Hence why I indicated it was a base.Probably more like Konecny + Laughton + Cutter Gauthier ++. Marner is one of the best players in the league, let’s be real here.
I'm sure the Kings would, but that's... bad. Durzi is not good and Kupari has a long way to go before he's even serviceable.If the Flyers are actually open to doing it, I'm guessing the Kings would want to do Kupari + Durzi + Petersen + picks/prospects for Provorov + Hart. Unless they can extend Gavrikov. Not sure that Kings and Flyers would be able to agree on the picks/prospects part though.
With what cap space lolFlames would probably have interest in Konecny. 16th overall for Konecny?
No he's not. He's simply at discounted value like Eichel was. The acquiring team would have to get access to his medicals or courseCouturier is a cap dump at this point. Nobody is paying assets for that contract right now.
Couts won a Selke.I remember when Couts was going to be a Selke contender and Philly had the best group of young d-men and D prospects in the league.
And I remember when WPG was getting 202X Stanley Cup champions? covers with their epic prospect pool.
Rebuilding is hard. And then when it doesn’t work and you have to do it again? Yikes
No he's not. He's simply at discounted value like Eichel was. The acquiring team would have to get access to his medicals or course
The Flyers are not looking for a game-changing forward in his prime, because we'd waste his career like we did G's. If Marner to a third team for future assets was part of the deal, there's something to work with here.Neutral fan, but something that seems logical would be:
Marner + something (Timmins?)
for
Provorov + Konecny
Money is nearly identical, Leafs get a big upgrade on D, Flyers get a game-changing forward and a young RH dman.
If I'm the Leafs I then call up LA and see about a Roy - McCabe swap
He's most certainly not, because we have no need to move him on that basis. I don't expect anyone to trade for him this offseason, but we aren't moving players just to move them, we're moving them to collect assets for the long term. He'd either be moved after a close look at his medicals at a discounted value, but still at some value, or we'll keep him until he proves his health back on the ice.He hasn't played hockey in over a year due to injury, only played 29 games in 21/22 and he's already on the north side of 30, signed for another 6 years at almost $8M...
He most certainly is a cap dump
Ya I think that's a great option for the Flyers too. I still think there's value for Philly to have a guy like Marner as a veteran shouldering the load for the young players and being their new Captain potentially. I'm not super familiar with Philly's prospect pool so maybe it's more worth it to them to flip Marner and build up the pool.The Flyers are not looking for a game-changing forward in his prime, because we'd waste his career like we did G's. If Marner to a third team for future assets was part of the deal, there's something to work with here.
Ya I think that's a great option for the Flyers too. I still think there's value for Philly to have a guy like Marner as a veteran shouldering the load for the young players and being their new Captain potentially. I'm not super familiar with Philly's prospect pool so maybe it's more worth it to them to flip Marner and build up the pool.
Marner is still only 26 though and has a lot of miles left. The guy will still be a top-end player by the time Philly would be on the rebound. Laughton would also be a good target for the Leafs
The Flyers are not looking for a game-changing forward in his prime, because we'd waste his career like we did G's. If Marner to a third team for future assets was part of the deal, there's something to work with here.
He's most certainly not, because we have no need to move him on that basis. I don't expect anyone to trade for him this offseason, but we aren't moving players just to move them, we're moving them to collect assets for the long term. He'd either be moved after a close look at his medicals at a discounted value, but still at some value, or we'll keep him until he proves his health back on the ice.
And there's the difference of opinion. IMO, a key element of "cap dump" is "dump." If you aren't intending to move a player, they're just expensive. They become a cap dump when you're willing to pay assets to get rid of them.Obviously.... That doesn't mean he isn't still a cap dump. He just wont be traded because of it.
Nobody is trading for him given his contract situation and his injury status. Philly also obviously wont trade him given that he has literally zero value. Its a situation that perhaps gets revisited at the trade deadline next summer if Couts can come back, be healthy and play at the level he was capable of before the injuries.
His situation is pretty similar to Landeskogs with the Avs, and at this point Landy is absolutely without question a negative value cap dump as well. When you're 30+ missing almost 2 entire seasons due to injury, nobody is trading for you.
And there's the difference of opinion. IMO, a key element of "cap dump" is "dump." If you aren't intending to move a player, they're just expensive. They become a cap dump when you're willing to pay assets to get rid of them.
The + would have to be more valuable than the base. What elite pieces are you offering?Hence why I indicated it was a base.
If Philly wants a scorched earth rebuild, Gauthier is not on the table. They just drafted him.
These players should probably all be available, as the Flyers enter into a rebuild. Who would be interested, and for what? Flyers would likely only be looking for Blue chip prospects, high draft picks or players under 22 years old. The Flyers currently have no cap room, so keep that in mind when making offers. They would likely be willing to eat contracts if they are sending salary out.
Current contracts
Carter Hart - 3.979M for 1 more Year - RFA, 24 Years old
Travis Konecny - 5.5M for 2 more Years - UFA, 26 Years old
Ivan Provorov - 6.75M for 2 more years - UFA, 26 Years old
Travis Sanheim - 6.25M for 8 more years - UFA 27 Years old
Scott Laughton - 3M for 3 more years - UFA 28 years old
Sean Couturier - 7.75M for 7 more years - UFA 30 years old
So like Eichel... But not nearly as a good a return due to age. You have to assume he's 100% healthy in any trade involving him because no team would consider trading for him if he's notHe hasn't played hockey in over a year due to injury, only played 29 games in 21/22 and he's already on the north side of 30, signed for another 6 years at almost $8M...
He most certainly is a cap dump