Proposal: Hampus Lindholm for Brad Marchand, Adam Mcquaid & Charles McAvoy

Alberta_OReilly_Fan

Bruin fan since 1975
Nov 26, 2006
14,331
3,941
Edmonton Canada
if someone tells me marchand isnt resigning AND tells me lindholm would extend at a reasonable price then this becomes a no brainer for boston.

i feel lindholm might already be resigned if hes seeking a reasonable price. if marchand ends up signing a reasonable deal to stay in boston then i dont have enough info to greenlight this deal.

if anaheim fans feel they need more... thats their progative. lindholm feels like he will be a very good top pair dman
 

Static

HFBoards Sponsor
Sponsor
Feb 28, 2006
49,414
37,765
SoCal
It's not more, it's what makes sense. Trading for a player they will lose in a year does not make sense. That seems simple enough.
 

WhatTheDuck

9 - 20 - 8
May 17, 2007
24,060
17,497
Worst Case, Ontario
The best piece being offered for a 22 year old top pairing dman is a rental winger? I don't care what the value stacks up to be, that's not a premise the Ducks would have even a remote interest in.
 

go4hockey

Registered User
Oct 14, 2007
6,216
2,469
Alta Loma CA
Why would the Bruins do that when Mcavoy looks like the steal of the draft and Marchy is trending up so quickly its not funny. Maybe i dont watch Lindholm enough but thats a lot of asset going to Anahiem

You clearly don't watch Lindholm enough. You take your "trending up so quickly it's not funny" fits Lindholm well too. That package would not land them Lindholm.
 

oilerbear

Registered User
Jun 2, 2008
3,169
201
Not trying to rock the boat... But 28 points at 22 years old doesn't make you a number one defenceman. Not now not ever!
Just ask Tyler Myers!

Top 300 goal scorers
27 are dmen.

A strong off dman gives the d.......puck to the forwards asap.
The more a dman drives the offence directly the less likely a goal is scored.
That covers goals for.

Goals against:
Lindholm is
1st comp
Top 10 hsca - the area 10 shots get 75 % of goals.
Top 30 SA d

He is one of the elite ha d in the game.
You know defending.
What d me do.

He is not the best in the game the last 2 years
Larsson

Or

The elite historical
Weber
Doughty

Elite off d are below league average in gf affect.
Which is below league average for goal diff.

The elite hsca d are the critical ga affect on games.

Mentioning dman offence as a positive is a lie.
They have a negative affect on winning.

GF give it to the top 278 goal scoring forwards.

GA get as many top 60 hsca d.

Pit
Love joy
Dumoulin
Cole

Chicago
Hjarlmasson
Oduya
Keith

LAK
Doughty
Martinez
Muzzin
Greene

Chicago
Hjarlmasson
Oduya
Rossival
Seabrook

LAK
Doughty
Voynov
Greene
Scuderi

Boston
Chara
Seidenberg
Boychuk
Ference

CHI
Hjarlmasson
Sopel
Campbell
Seabrook
 

go4hockey

Registered User
Oct 14, 2007
6,216
2,469
Alta Loma CA
Even if they deal Fowler, I don't see how they sign both without going well over their internal budget and are they just going to deal Fowler for prospects and picks? Either way, the Ducks roster is going to take a hit I would think.

Maybe ownership is willing to spend a lil close to the cap since they are as close and could make a deep run. Who knows? They will be fine either way.
 

Mikeshane

Registered User
Jan 15, 2013
6,175
3,924
What? That's a great offer but I can understand why the Ducks don't do it. Marchand is criminally underrated.

On another note, how are the Ducks going to be able to sign Lindholm and Rackell? Aren't they already pushing their internal budget? They seem kind of screwed, no?

That's what I'm wondering, say Lindholm comes in somewhere around the 7.5 million Ekblad got. Then you got Rackell who got 20 goals, that's gotta be worth at least 3 million. Ducks don't have anywhere close to that much cap space.
 

Goose of Reason

El Zilcho
May 1, 2013
9,732
9,466
That's what I'm wondering, say Lindholm comes in somewhere around the 7.5 million Ekblad got. Then you got Rackell who got 20 goals, that's gotta be worth at least 3 million. Ducks don't have anywhere close to that much cap space.

Lindholm's comparables are Jones and Rielly who are in the 5.5mil range. That Ekblad contract did not set market value as it was an overpayment. Rakell didn't do much of anything before this year and scored 43 points. We're assuming he'll be signed to a 2-year bridge deal, and his comparables will put him in the 2-3mil range tops. Murray is also a wiz at RFA deals usually so I'm not worried about that. Fowler, Despres and Stoner can all be moved to clear cap space. We're fine.
 

wintersej

Registered User
Nov 26, 2011
23,251
19,093
North Andover, MA
Top 300 goal scorers
27 are dmen.

A strong off dman gives the d.......puck to the forwards asap.
The more a dman drives the offence directly the less likely a goal is scored.
That covers goals for.

Goals against:
Lindholm is
1st comp
Top 10 hsca - the area 10 shots get 75 % of goals.
Top 30 SA d

He is one of the elite ha d in the game.
You know defending.
What d me do.

He is not the best in the game the last 2 years
Larsson

Or

The elite historical
Weber
Doughty

Elite off d are below league average in gf affect.
Which is below league average for goal diff.

The elite hsca d are the critical ga affect on games.

Mentioning dman offence as a positive is a lie.
They have a negative affect on winning.

GF give it to the top 278 goal scoring forwards.

GA get as many top 60 hsca d.

Pit
Love joy
Dumoulin
Cole

Chicago
Hjarlmasson
Oduya
Keith

LAK
Doughty
Martinez
Muzzin
Greene

Chicago
Hjarlmasson
Oduya
Rossival
Seabrook

LAK
Doughty
Voynov
Greene
Scuderi

Boston
Chara
Seidenberg
Boychuk
Ference

CHI
Hjarlmasson
Sopel
Campbell
Seabrook

Lots to dissect here and oddly put together, but, for starters, you can't just throw up HSCA as the be all end all. If it was, Kevan Miller and Adam McQuaid would be a Norris contenders.
 

Arthuros

Registered Snoozer
Feb 24, 2014
13,540
9,171
Littleroot Town
What is essentially a rental, a dump and a prospect to add to a surplus of defensive prospects?

Maybe if you changed Charles McAvoy to James McAvoy...
 

Jeti

Blue-Line Dekes
Jul 8, 2011
7,141
1,684
MTL
If Marchand had more term left on his deal, this is the type of overpayment it'd take, but with one year left, it's clearly not acceptable to Anaheim
 

Midship

Registered User
Jan 7, 2016
3,099
2,521
I think this proposal will be much more reasonable for Anaheim, if they're giving up Lindholm.

Anaheim

Krug
2017 1st round draft pick
Charles McAvoy
Brad Marchand

Boston:

Hampus Lindholm

Extreme overpay from Boston's perspective. No chance.
 

JoeIsAStud

HFBoards Sponsor
Sponsor
Feb 27, 2002
12,710
7,244
Visit site
The best piece being offered for a 22 year old top pairing dman is a rental winger? I don't care what the value stacks up to be, that's not a premise the Ducks would have even a remote interest in.

This proposal also has an 18 year old potential stud defenseman who was the best player on the ice at the recent World Junior camp.

I think this is one of many deals around here that neither team does.

Marchand isn't a rental winger in Boston. He is a core piece who should be a fairly easy resign (won't be cheap but he wants to be in Boston longterm)

Then you have McAvoy who absolutely looks like a future top pairing defenseman, and of course is a local college kid.
 

Atren

Registered User
Jun 29, 2011
478
5
Europe
In order this trade have any reasonable chance Marchand needs to have resigned to long deal. Even then I doubt Ducks would do it.
 

Mikeshane

Registered User
Jan 15, 2013
6,175
3,924
Lindholm's comparables are Jones and Rielly who are in the 5.5mil range. That Ekblad contract did not set market value as it was an overpayment. Rakell didn't do much of anything before this year and scored 43 points. We're assuming he'll be signed to a 2-year bridge deal, and his comparables will put him in the 2-3mil range tops. Murray is also a wiz at RFA deals usually so I'm not worried about that. Fowler, Despres and Stoner can all be moved to clear cap space. We're fine.

No way, Jones isn't as good as Lindholm and Rielly is closer but he's not there yet either. Lindholm has already proven himself capable of being a #1 in the playoffs. No way he takes 5.5.
 

Eternal Leaf

Registered User
Jul 4, 2011
8,138
9,788
Toronto
Signed Marchand would be enticing I'd assume.

That's a good piece which fits their core's age group.

Lindholm is damn good though.
 

Rorschach

Who the f*** is Trevor Moore?
Oct 9, 2006
11,579
2,125
Los Angeles
Anaheim wouldn't have time to say no because most of the teams in the league would beat that offer, even if they already had a #1 DMan already.
 

pbgoalie

Registered User
Aug 8, 2010
5,989
3,574
not a ridiculous proposal, but the ducks cannot take on a rental with an internal budget
While giving up their likely centerpiece of the defense corps.

We have lots of great young defense prospects, but nothing close to proven as Hhampus.

I think Fowler is amazing for the most part, but our prospects are more suitable to step in for Fowler than Hampus if a choice were to be made...for now

Of course, a long hold out can change a budget teams outlook as well
 

Zegs2sendhelp

HFBoards Sponsor
Sponsor
Jul 25, 2012
42,764
39,717
After watching lindholm in the Nashville series I have no interest in moving him for pretty anyone not named mcdavid.we've needed a top pairing dmen basically sense pronger and neids left, no way we are moving one, especially a cost controlled 22 year old one.
 

PsychoDad

Registered User
Apr 20, 2007
2,696
4
Berlin
Lol, I like how Anaheim fans are disgusted by this offer, but as a Bruins fan - hell no.
Marchand is a unique player, a top10 left wing in the NHL, AND his goals come from even strength and PK - he is the best PK scorer in the league BY FAR. Adding a known winner, a tough pos in McQuaid AND our best D prospect with very legit upside - I don't care if your boy is Nicklas mfking Lidstrom, you don't laugh about offers like that.
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad