rypper
21-12-05 it's finally over.
- Dec 22, 2006
- 17,155
- 21,932
Some hilariously bad takes in this thread. Very revealing in a "old man yells at cloud" sort of way.
First couple games he looked fine and created some really good chances. Last 3 games have been historically bad for him. To me it is meaningless at this point.
There is no way to know if hes done as a superstar or if this is just because he hasnt played in forever and needs some time. I think the latter is far more likely than the former, but the only way anyone can know is to wait and see. Opining about what might be the case isnt worth the effort. Assuming any situation is permanent is a mistake people often make. Both for good and bad situations. Petey is not likely to always be bad, Garland isnt going to always carry us on his back each night (though he may try).
So what?
Sedins were the most "morally pure" and exemplary players and people you could have.
And they still got shit on even though they were "fairly" paid.
I guess to Pettersson credit at least he was smart enough to get paid for getting shit on.
Chad Henne just came in for Patrick Mahomes. There's no shame in getting benched or sitting out a game if a player is slumping. I hate when coaches give bias to their top players.
I remember Patrick Kane used to hate Joel Quenneville in his first year because he got less ice-time, but it was temporary until Kane became a complete player.
Something's up with EP, and hopefully the Sedins can get to the bottom of it. This season has just been a continuation of early last season...
Something's up with EP, and hopefully the Sedins can get to the bottom of it. This season has just been a continuation of early last season...
This is from January, but man that's disturbing. Comparisons to Naslund's body language the last couple of years in Vancouver might not be overstated.
This is from January, but man that's disturbing. Comparisons to Naslund's body language the last couple of years in Vancouver might not be overstated.
Laughable post.If he keeps doing that then IMO we should trade him. Don’t need that type of prima dona in this team. We need guys like Garland and OEL who actually want to be part of the Canucks.
Development is never linear.
Pettersson will be fine.
what a bunch of hogwash blaming them wanting to make him a C. He's clearly a 1C
He's forcing things instead of protecting the puck. And he couldn't run around like he did in his rookie year or he would get injured. He had a wrist injury that will take a little time to get back to 100% and his timing with his wingers is off as well as his with the lost games. Petey will be fine the kids a top player in the league and will prove it by years end. He just needs to play and stop turning over the puck trying to make low percentage plays. If were having this discussion in the new year then we got bigger problems
Laughable post.
Come on guys.
This is embarrassing
Missing training camp wasn't good, but honestly Benning could have wrapped that negotiation up a lot quicker.
If you think Kane’s defence is bad, you should have seen it when he was 19/20. He’s nothing special but using his hands for defence not just offence. Plus the maturity and experience shows when he positions himself around the ice.Maybe if this coach didn't have a history of keeping vets who play awful in the lineup you could argue this. For our best player and a player we need to be a superstar to have any chance with this core? No way...
Also lol at Patty Kane being a complete player. Probably the worst defensive player in the NHL
This is from January, but man that's disturbing. Comparisons to Naslund's body language the last couple of years in Vancouver might not be overstated.
I will never forget Naslunds performance against the Wild in 2008 (?) when he just passively gave up a puck to Demitra and didn't bother backchecking. The infamous shootout blunder when he skated past the puck at center ice happened in the same game...
It really seemed like Naslund lost his love for hockey after 2004.