Speculation: Habs Mega Thread

Status
Not open for further replies.

domiwroze

Registered User
Nov 14, 2014
5,600
7,673
this thread is going as well as expected.

- Yes Price at 10.5M is risky af and not worth the shot
- Yes Price at 6M is gold.
- No Price at 6M isnt worth a 1st + b prospect + fat cap dump

there.
 

Qwijibo

Registered User
Dec 1, 2014
3,571
3,561
Pretty sure Romanov can play on both sides of the ice? If so then any discussion would have to start with him. Anderson as a replacement RW doesn't really do much for me, would rather have a young RH C come back (think you guys only have Jake Evans who fits that category?). Also no interest in Mailloux, for obvious PR reasons.

Minimum would be Anderson, Romanov and 1st (could expand the trade and include Dickinson in exchange for Jake Evans).
Hahahaha
Hahaha
Oh, you’re serious
 

glenbuis

Registered User
Sep 17, 2012
4,761
896
I guess we'll just have to wait and see.

Did you forget about the fact Suzuki was drafted before him and has a season less of experience then him? Or were you just ignoring that? Drafted in a higher position, bigger, stronger...

As a Sens fan, I think it would be awesome if Nick Suzuki became their next captain.

And to stay on topic... what do you guys want for Romanov. Sens won't pay it but I'm still curious.
pinto plus
 

HabsAddict

Registered User
Feb 27, 2002
7,719
5,769
Visit site
yes we better get taken out to supper first because that was brutal . i love how fans from other teams jump in with their anti habs biased opinions. vancouver will be shopping boesar hard because of his qualifying offer . another laine/ meire situation

Throw Suzuki into every trade and a line of laughing emojis....
 

zar

Bleed Blue
Oct 9, 2010
7,529
7,594
Edmonton AB
The amount of lunacy spewed on this thread is uncanny?

Price single-handedly brought a regular Habs team to the finals of the Stanley cup less than 6 months ago and most of you are saying Price at 6 million is bad?

Good luck winning the cup with 51 year old Smith and 4.5 million Kosk.

Price at 6 is an issue but Koskinen at 4.5 is fine. LOL

Price at $6m for 4+ years could be very bad… could be OK too.

Koskinen is bad at $4.5m but we only have that contract for the remainder of this season.
 

Soundwave

Registered User
Mar 1, 2007
74,010
30,118
I would love to have Price, but when you consider it probably will cost only a 2nd + B-tier prospect to get MAF instead ... is it really worth paying through the ass for Price?

Great goalie, but Montreal would have to retain so much money which would come at the cost of so many picks, prospects that you're probably just better off giving Chicago a 2nd at the deadline for MAF.

Broberg for example has 9 points in his first 12 AHL games, that's a higher scoring rate (far higher actually) than Klefbom or Nurse did in the AHL. Do you really want to be giving away that player?

And out of respect for Price I would still consider doing it, but I think there are just far cheaper options and realistically I don't think a team will ever retain $4 million on any player for multiple years.

I think it would be great for hockey in general to see McDavid, Draisaitl, and Price team up, but the salary dynamics of it and what Montreal would have to be compensated for versus what the cost of other goalie upgrades would be ... it's just tough. Not impossible, but tough. If I'm Edmonton and Montreal is looking to retool/rebuild sure I try and make it work, but I'm just not seeing how it would.

A 3rd team like Arizona would probably have to be involved to retain salary, but again how many picks is Edmonton willing to give away. Certainly some, but there has to be a line in the sand too.
 
Last edited:

Soundwave

Registered User
Mar 1, 2007
74,010
30,118
The only way I think a deal like this could work is something like this (three way)

To MTL:
Barrie, Koskinen (expiring cap dump), Yamamoto, EDM 1st 2022

To EDM:
Price (2 mill retained by MTL, 2 mill retained by ARI), Crouse@50% retained, Chiarot @50% retained (rental player)

To ARI:
EDM 1st 2023, Kassian

And even this, two 1sts, plus Yamamoto (another 1st round pick) is a lot to give up for Price (if Seattle wasn't f***ing stupid, maybe they should've just picked Price for the purposes of flipping him later, because they probably could've gotten a number of good picks for him).
 

zcaptain

Registered User
Apr 4, 2012
1,559
530
Everybody talks about Boesers qualifying offer........

Everbody knows how that works right..........

No way Boeser signs a 1 year deal, unless he is choosing to walk, so who ever has him , will sign a multi-year deal, with a cap hit lesst than the 8 million..........

Everone uses that as a scare tactic...............but for most contracts, it is not a real concern

Sure it happens, but just not that often...........
 
  • Like
Reactions: Cogburn

Archijerej

Registered User
Jan 17, 2005
8,565
8,214
Poland
Look, another shooting winger!

We absolutely need to add those. It's not like we have plenty of those not scoring, because there's no one outside Suzuki to pass them the puck.
 

glenbuis

Registered User
Sep 17, 2012
4,761
896
Everybody talks about Boesers qualifying offer........

Everbody knows how that works right..........

No way Boeser signs a 1 year deal, unless he is choosing to walk, so who ever has him , will sign a multi-year deal, with a cap hit lesst than the 8 million..........

Everone uses that as a scare tactic...............but for most contracts, it is not a real concern

Sure it happens, but just not that often...........
it's the reason canuck fans want to trade him .
 

Habs Halifax

Loyal Habs Fan
Jul 11, 2016
70,781
27,844
East Coast
I know you are familiar with the era I’m talking about and the fiasco that it was. Stop being disingenuous.

I'm not being disingenuous. I'm familiar to some degree but not with their salaries and contract terms. I was like 13 years old in 93 and not even sure cap friendly existed then.

Basically, you think you found an example but you are not providing the context to support it. Can you find it? Not sure. I know I can't. Not saying you are wright or wrong but a shit load more context is required to verify it. My gut tells me the contract terms they moved out are not the same as what we would have to do today. I'm firm on that until you can provide the context to change my mind?
 

Habs Halifax

Loyal Habs Fan
Jul 11, 2016
70,781
27,844
East Coast
No!
Couldn't care less about the 1st rounder or Koskinen.

Broberg is okay but we have 3 Brobergs in Harris, Struble, Norlinder.

Price at 6 mill is gold.

You want price at 6 million especially with him back on track?
We need something solid or tangible, not magic beans.

The 1st rounder is useless Habs can't draft.
Broberg is redundant, oh and Habs can't develop.
Koskinen is useless.

Price at 6 mill can be had for a roster player and a 1st pick because they obviously going to ask for it.

1) Nobody cares about Koskinen. He's a pending UFA and it's for cap reasons. Do you really think we are taking him for value?

2) Price at $6M is gold. I agree there and it's the only way we can trade him where teams can fit him in so that's why I proposed the idea. Habs won't need that cap space while we rebuild

3) You want a proven young roster player coming the other way. Fair but that strategy might back fire on you cause teams looking to add Price want to keep their current roster in place... cup runs. They would consider futures and is a 1st and Broberg worth it? I would say that is a starting point and I would engage more on it. Cause like you said, Price at $6M (A Healthy Price) is gold.
 

Habs Halifax

Loyal Habs Fan
Jul 11, 2016
70,781
27,844
East Coast
Chiarot might get a 1st, but I wouldn't be the one giving that up for him. And let's be honest about Price, even at 6M, he's possibly a negative asset at this point, especially given that he'll be finishing that contract at 38 years old. I know the OP stipulated the condition that he'd be back to his regular self, but that's a pretty big proviso. Of course you're going to pay a lot for 4 years of "normal" Price, because that's a top 10 goaltender. In reality, he's a big risk.

Chiarot might get a 1st but I'm doubtful. I think he gets two 2nd's kind of return.

But with Price, we are far apart. If Price is healthy and we will find that out soon. Playing in the Olympics and we get to see where he stands at the deadline. He's not a negative asset at this point. With all due respect, that is a horrible take. Fleury just won the Vezina at age 36. You put goalies like Fleury or Price on a good team and they will give that team a boost!

Sure, you don't value Price. That's your choice. This idea was about giving the Oilers a substantial goalie for cup runs at a very good AAV rate. If Price is healthy come deadline, he has more value than you might realize if we consider moving him with retention and he is willing to waive his NMC to go to a contender.
 

Habs Halifax

Loyal Habs Fan
Jul 11, 2016
70,781
27,844
East Coast
I think Carey Price would love to play with McDavid and Draisaitl, sure. That's not the issue. He's a Western Canadian kid anyway.

I think if the Habs are willing to retain and Price is asked to go to a contender, he waives and it's a deal that is workable. Price at $6M is gold and Habs can't rebuild until we move him. Reality. No doubt in my mind that he waives to play with McDavid and Drai
 

Habs Halifax

Loyal Habs Fan
Jul 11, 2016
70,781
27,844
East Coast
How long until he falls off the rails again? Bigger chance of that than a 1st/Broberg busting.

Varmalov might be available and I'm sure the Isles would like to rid themselves of their expensive back up

It's up to the Oilers to decide that. Price has had injury issues lately but he has shown his true form in back to back playoffs. If you are low on Price at $6M, that's your choice.

A bigger chance Price disappoints than a late 1st and Broberg busting? Do you want to try to prove that? Good luck
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad