d
dafuq??
ur willing to scam urself??
Goaltending is 75% of your team. If you don't have it, then its 100%
That's where the Oilers find themselves. They have improved from the net out but it won't matter if our goalies cant stop a beach ball.
McDrai are in their prime, it's time to make a run for the Cup
Lol "minimum". You do know that the Habs are a bottom 5 team right? No chance you get that 1st for Boeser.Pretty sure Romanov can play on both sides of the ice? If so then any discussion would have to start with him. Anderson as a replacement RW doesn't really do much for me, would rather have a young RH C come back (think you guys only have Jake Evans who fits that category?). Also no interest in Mailloux, for obvious PR reasons.
Minimum would be Anderson, Romanov and 1st (could expand the trade and include Dickinson in exchange for Jake Evans).
I know you are familiar with the era I’m talking about and the fiasco that it was. Stop being disingenuous.Not sure I can see the contract terms and AAV's from those years. It's deeper than just saying "stars were moved in the following seasons". How many years left in each case and how difficult it was to move and what was returned in trades or did they just let them walk.
Really? Are there better goaltending options on the market for cheaper or would you rather ride Koskinen at $4.5M?
I would not even take Price with retention for free. His age, injury history, unclear mental status based on his absence this season, for 6 million for 5 years? No way, thats negative value that the Habs are going to keep. There are so many alternatives that sounds way more appealing than that.Take out Chiarot and I would give a 1st + Broberg + Koskinen for Price @ 6m
All for Boeser? Im a Canucks fan but that seems like an awful big ask for Boeser. I would think Anderson and Romanov alone would require Boeser + and probably be poorly received by Habs fans.Pretty sure Romanov can play on both sides of the ice? If so then any discussion would have to start with him. Anderson as a replacement RW doesn't really do much for me, would rather have a young RH C come back (think you guys only have Jake Evans who fits that category?). Also no interest in Mailloux, for obvious PR reasons.
Minimum would be Anderson, Romanov and 1st (could expand the trade and include Dickinson in exchange for Jake Evans).
Either ride out Koskinen. Hit up Dallas, Boston, for one of their extra goalies. Or maybe go after a teams backup who you think could be a solid 1 year stop gap.Really? Are there better goaltending options on the market for cheaper or would you rather ride Koskinen at $4.5M?
This package probably holds about the same value as Josh Brook alone. You'd have to add a very good prospect.Josh Anderson, Josh Brook and a 2nd round pick for Brock Boeser?
Lol "minimum". You do know that the Habs are a bottom 5 team right? No chance you get that 1st for Boeser.
Either ride out Koskinen. Hit up Dallas, Boston, for one of their extra goalies. Or maybe go after a teams backup who you think could be a solid 1 year stop gap.
Price is a non-starter. Allen would be significantly more appealing despite his weak start.
i woudlnt even trade our 1st alone for Boeser....Pretty sure Romanov can play on both sides of the ice? If so then any discussion would have to start with him. Anderson as a replacement RW doesn't really do much for me, would rather have a young RH C come back (think you guys only have Jake Evans who fits that category?). Also no interest in Mailloux, for obvious PR reasons.
Minimum would be Anderson, Romanov and 1st (could expand the trade and include Dickinson in exchange for Jake Evans).
Montreal are not trading for Boeser.So we’ve all heard rumours of Van looking to potentially change up their locker room.
To MTL —-> Brock Boeser
To VAN —-> Josh Anderson
Does this trade make sense for either team? Which side adds? If any
minimum at that ? this is insane will keep anderson romanov and our first . minimum lol your out to lunchPretty sure Romanov can play on both sides of the ice? If so then any discussion would have to start with him. Anderson as a replacement RW doesn't really do much for me, would rather have a young RH C come back (think you guys only have Jake Evans who fits that category?). Also no interest in Mailloux, for obvious PR reasons.
Minimum would be Anderson, Romanov and 1st (could expand the trade and include Dickinson in exchange for Jake Evans).
nothing close to your proposal what is his qualifying offer set at ? that alone is enough reason to stay awayLol well you do know how bargaining works right? I can't set my bar too low otherwise it'd just be selling low on a guy who's been an all-star before and is still young but just is having a bad season so far.
What would be your best offer?
Canucks decline.So we’ve all heard rumours of Van looking to potentially change up their locker room.
To MTL —-> Brock Boeser
To VAN —-> Josh Anderson
Does this trade make sense for either team? Which side adds? If any
No!
Couldn't care less about the 1st rounder or Koskinen.
Broberg is okay but we have 3 Brobergs in Harris, Struble, Norlinder.
Price at 6 mill is gold.
You want price at 6 million especially with him back on track?
We need something solid or tangible, not magic beans.
The 1st rounder is useless Habs can't draft.
Broberg is redundant, oh and Habs can't develop.
Koskinen is useless.
Price at 6 mill can be had for a roster player and a 1st pick because they obviously going to ask for it.