Speculation: Habs Mega Thread

Status
Not open for further replies.

McJC

Registered User
May 2, 2010
4,007
1,187
Edmonton
d

dafuq??

ur willing to scam urself??

Goaltending is 75% of your team. If you don't have it, then its 100%
That's where the Oilers find themselves. They have improved from the net out but it won't matter if our goalies cant stop a beach ball.
McDrai are in their prime, it's time to make a run for the Cup
 
  • Like
Reactions: jfhabs

PettersonHughes

Registered User
Aug 26, 2020
1,699
714
Pretty sure Romanov can play on both sides of the ice? If so then any discussion would have to start with him. Anderson as a replacement RW doesn't really do much for me, would rather have a young RH C come back (think you guys only have Jake Evans who fits that category?). Also no interest in Mailloux, for obvious PR reasons.

Minimum would be Anderson, Romanov and 1st (could expand the trade and include Dickinson in exchange for Jake Evans).
 

McHelpus

Registered User
Jan 16, 2021
2,390
3,484
Goaltending is 75% of your team. If you don't have it, then its 100%
That's where the Oilers find themselves. They have improved from the net out but it won't matter if our goalies cant stop a beach ball.
McDrai are in their prime, it's time to make a run for the Cup

Exactly. A healthy carey price is a #1 goalie and at 6 million that's not even a question to have him. We were gonna give markstrom 7 million dollars.
 

The Great Weal

Phil's Pizza
Jan 15, 2015
55,074
70,681
Pretty sure Romanov can play on both sides of the ice? If so then any discussion would have to start with him. Anderson as a replacement RW doesn't really do much for me, would rather have a young RH C come back (think you guys only have Jake Evans who fits that category?). Also no interest in Mailloux, for obvious PR reasons.

Minimum would be Anderson, Romanov and 1st (could expand the trade and include Dickinson in exchange for Jake Evans).
Lol "minimum". You do know that the Habs are a bottom 5 team right? No chance you get that 1st for Boeser.
 

Garbageyuk

Registered User
Dec 19, 2016
6,577
6,418
Not sure I can see the contract terms and AAV's from those years. It's deeper than just saying "stars were moved in the following seasons". How many years left in each case and how difficult it was to move and what was returned in trades or did they just let them walk.
I know you are familiar with the era I’m talking about and the fiasco that it was. Stop being disingenuous.
 

The Moose is Loose

Registered User
Jun 28, 2017
10,344
9,295
St.Louis
Take out Chiarot and I would give a 1st + Broberg + Koskinen for Price @ 6m
I would not even take Price with retention for free. His age, injury history, unclear mental status based on his absence this season, for 6 million for 5 years? No way, thats negative value that the Habs are going to keep. There are so many alternatives that sounds way more appealing than that.
Look at his regular season numbers- hint they're bad and have been mediocre for years.

Gets 10x times worse when you toss in the Oilers best prospect and a 1st
 

Boondock

Registered User
Feb 6, 2009
5,783
2,391
Pretty sure Romanov can play on both sides of the ice? If so then any discussion would have to start with him. Anderson as a replacement RW doesn't really do much for me, would rather have a young RH C come back (think you guys only have Jake Evans who fits that category?). Also no interest in Mailloux, for obvious PR reasons.

Minimum would be Anderson, Romanov and 1st (could expand the trade and include Dickinson in exchange for Jake Evans).
All for Boeser? Im a Canucks fan but that seems like an awful big ask for Boeser. I would think Anderson and Romanov alone would require Boeser + and probably be poorly received by Habs fans.
 

The Moose is Loose

Registered User
Jun 28, 2017
10,344
9,295
St.Louis
Really? Are there better goaltending options on the market for cheaper or would you rather ride Koskinen at $4.5M?
Either ride out Koskinen. Hit up Dallas, Boston, for one of their extra goalies. Or maybe go after a teams backup who you think could be a solid 1 year stop gap.

Price is a non-starter. Allen would be significantly more appealing despite his weak start.
 

Hunter368

RIP lomiller1, see you in the next life buddy.
Nov 8, 2011
27,401
24,553
Hard to imagine any GM rolling the dice on Price at this point. Injuries, off ice issues and just meh results for years and huge contract when cap hit & salaries are more impactful then ever…….he hasn’t put up league average sv % since about 2016-17 (outside 2018). The rolling the dice I referred to is small sample size when he’s actually been good (last playoffs as an example where he carried a bubble team to the finals, but it’s a small sample size). Huge risk taking him on, just don’t see anyone doing it, especially considering it’s not a one year risk/gamble, it’s a multi year gamble. I see him playing few more years for the Habs and maybe even retiring a Hab.

A GM could gamble on him if the Habs retain to get his cap hit down to 6 million but I doubt the Habs retain that many years, if he had less term maybe.

I could see the Oilers maybe kicking the tires on Allen.
 
Last edited:

PettersonHughes

Registered User
Aug 26, 2020
1,699
714
Lol "minimum". You do know that the Habs are a bottom 5 team right? No chance you get that 1st for Boeser.

Lol well you do know how bargaining works right? I can't set my bar too low otherwise it'd just be selling low on a guy who's been an all-star before and is still young but just is having a bad season so far.

What would be your best offer?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Canadian Canuck

DingDongCharlie

Registered User
Sep 12, 2010
11,690
9,792
Price at $6 million is definitely worth a few good assets but I have zero interest personally in trading Broberg and our 1st for him.
 
  • Like
Reactions: TFHockey

lamp9post

Registered User
Jan 28, 2007
4,460
1,773
Either ride out Koskinen. Hit up Dallas, Boston, for one of their extra goalies. Or maybe go after a teams backup who you think could be a solid 1 year stop gap.

Price is a non-starter. Allen would be significantly more appealing despite his weak start.

Fair enough, and I'm not trying to convince you one way or the other. Just can't help feeling that a team on the precipice of contending, who's window is open for the next four years, and who's weakness is goaltending, wouldn't consider the most talented goalie (arguably) of their generation.
 

Nico Cauzuki

Registered User
Jul 19, 2009
6,573
6,732
King Of The North
Pretty sure Romanov can play on both sides of the ice? If so then any discussion would have to start with him. Anderson as a replacement RW doesn't really do much for me, would rather have a young RH C come back (think you guys only have Jake Evans who fits that category?). Also no interest in Mailloux, for obvious PR reasons.

Minimum would be Anderson, Romanov and 1st (could expand the trade and include Dickinson in exchange for Jake Evans).
i woudlnt even trade our 1st alone for Boeser....
 

Habs10025

Registered User
Sep 28, 2017
3,607
970
So we’ve all heard rumours of Van looking to potentially change up their locker room.

To MTL —-> Brock Boeser

To VAN —-> Josh Anderson

Does this trade make sense for either team? Which side adds? If any
Montreal are not trading for Boeser.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Kosseca

glenbuis

Registered User
Sep 17, 2012
4,761
896
Pretty sure Romanov can play on both sides of the ice? If so then any discussion would have to start with him. Anderson as a replacement RW doesn't really do much for me, would rather have a young RH C come back (think you guys only have Jake Evans who fits that category?). Also no interest in Mailloux, for obvious PR reasons.

Minimum would be Anderson, Romanov and 1st (could expand the trade and include Dickinson in exchange for Jake Evans).
minimum at that ? this is insane will keep anderson romanov and our first . minimum lol your out to lunch
 

glenbuis

Registered User
Sep 17, 2012
4,761
896
Lol well you do know how bargaining works right? I can't set my bar too low otherwise it'd just be selling low on a guy who's been an all-star before and is still young but just is having a bad season so far.

What would be your best offer?
nothing close to your proposal what is his qualifying offer set at ? that alone is enough reason to stay away
 

elitepete

Registered User
Jan 30, 2017
8,178
5,519
Vancouver
So we’ve all heard rumours of Van looking to potentially change up their locker room.

To MTL —-> Brock Boeser

To VAN —-> Josh Anderson

Does this trade make sense for either team? Which side adds? If any
Canucks decline.

ANderson+ for Miller might work
 

Jumptheshark

Rebooting myself
Oct 12, 2003
100,925
14,806
Somewhere on Uranus
No!
Couldn't care less about the 1st rounder or Koskinen.

Broberg is okay but we have 3 Brobergs in Harris, Struble, Norlinder.

Price at 6 mill is gold.

You want price at 6 million especially with him back on track?
We need something solid or tangible, not magic beans.

The 1st rounder is useless Habs can't draft.
Broberg is redundant, oh and Habs can't develop.
Koskinen is useless.

Price at 6 mill can be had for a roster player and a 1st pick because they obviously going to ask for it.


Price at 6 is not a steal.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad