Speculation: Habs finish 28th and bottom 5 in 24-25 season

Lockin17

Registered User
Jul 31, 2018
3,531
2,639
let's tank on last time and get

#6 : Ivan Ryabkin.
CGY : #14 : Luka Radivojevic
Then the rebuild is over
 

Zilo44

Registered User
Jul 4, 2012
1,403
1,907
Let’s hope we finish higher than that. It would also help sell future UFAs that we are an actual up and coming team
 

Guess

Registered User
Jul 16, 2010
1,109
948
Brossard, QC
We'll only truly be able to compete in 2026-27, by which time price's contract is off the books and Gallagher and Anderson are probably offloaded, Demidov's already had a full season in the NHL and a lot of our prospects have made the jump and acclimated themselves.
 

Archijerej

Registered User
Jan 17, 2005
8,518
8,094
Poland
If we were contenders I’d agree with you. But we’re not. We’re not making the playoffs. The standings don’t matter as much as player progression.

Nobody's saying about contending. However, the team goals for next season are no longer entirely divorced from the standings and we should adjust our strategy accordingly.

Unless of course everything we've heard from the management recently is bullshit.

Look at what happened with CC and Slaf when they played with better players. Their points went up. Their play improved.

It’s one thing to have Beck on the 3rd learning D but Roy’s an offensive player. Why not let him play on the second? I’d even give him some shifts on the first.

Caufield and Slafkovsky were different caliber of prospects. Roy not being ready risks not only his development, but that of Dach and Newhook as well. Not to mention the stated team goals.
 

RationalExpectations

Registered User
May 12, 2019
5,070
3,892
I think still a lot will happen until the season starts. Some important RFAs still unsigned, many teams with a lot of cap space…

As of now, this is a lot about organic growth for the Habs so let s see if the younger players take a step forward.

In terms of tiering rightnow I have the following :

Tank : SJS

Rebuild : CHI, ANA, MTL, CBJ, PHI

Bubble playoffs : OTT, SEA, CGY, BUF (should be better but well…), MIN, PIT, DET, STL, NYI, WSH, WPG, CAR (I think losing players and ageing core will hurt them but their system seems bullet proof :) ), LAK, UTA

Contenders : NJD, VGK, TBL, NSH, COL, DAL, NYR, BOS TOR FLA EDM VAN.

Without any material improvement this should be a bottom 6 team again
 
Last edited:

Lafleurs Guy

Guuuuuuuy!
Jul 20, 2007
76,213
46,731
Nobody's saying about contending. However, the team goals for next season are no longer entirely divorced from the standings and we should adjust our strategy accordingly.

Unless of course everything we've heard from the management recently is bullshit.
I brought up contending, I didn’t say anyone else did. And I brought it up to say we’re not there and our situation- and the way we should conduct ourselves- is different from a contender.

In that case I might even suggest trading Roy away for an experienced player. But as a rebuild team, I’d rather him than a vet developing in the top six.
Caufield and Slafkovsky were different caliber of prospects. Roy not being ready risks not only his development, but that of Dach and Newhook as well. Not to mention the stated team goals.
Who says he’s not ready? He was improving quite a bit as the season went on. He spent his time in the minors and didn’t jump in at 18 the way Slaf did.

If he struggles we can always make changes later but honestly, I think he’d be fine on the 2nd.
 

Lafleurs Guy

Guuuuuuuy!
Jul 20, 2007
76,213
46,731
As a sidenote,

It’s really nice to be able to have a debate as to whether or not we should use a great prospect or grab a vet to play on the second line. This is so vastly different from a “why did we make this stupid trade” or “why are we mismanaging things so badly” type discussions we’ve had here for so long.

Finally, we have an upcoming team where mgmt is working to build from the ground up and actively working to plug holes where they see issues.

Whether we should get a vet or not is a refreshing change of pace here given the context of where we’re at. So much better than “why did we have Desharnais on our first line?” type discussions.
 

OB5

Registered User
May 2, 2015
5,615
4,036
Fact is, the Habs have done nothing to improve the roster that was bottom five last year, so why should it be any different this year? They're hoping every player takes a step forward and the collective improves to the point where they take the next step. It's plausible but improbable. Management said they want to be more competitive this year and are banking on the players they have to grow and take the next step. They tried to nab Marchessault and the summer is still relatively early so there is time for changes but as of today there is nothing to really grasp on to other than "vibes."

What's funny to me is that the media have all been like "this roster is going to be so different."

We'll see.
 

Seven7

Registered User
Nov 26, 2021
1,145
1,543
but the French media told me they were going to battle for a playoff spot this year!

to be fair I am expecting another bottom 5 year, which would be ideal for the rebuild.
 

Weltschmerz

Front Running Fan
Apr 22, 2007
5,046
3,216
I think still a lot will happen until the season starts. Some important RFAs still unsigned, many teams with a lot of cap space…

As of now, this is a lot about organic growth for the Habs so let s see if the younger players take a step forward.

In terms of tiering rightnow I have the following :

Tank : SJS

Rebuild : CHI, ANA, MTL, CBJ, PHI

Bubble playoffs : OTT, SEA, CGY, BUF (should be better but well…), MIN, PIT, DET, STL, NYI, WSH, WPG, CAR (I think losing players and ageing core will hurt them but their system seems bullet proof :) ), LAK, UTA

Contenders : NJD, VGK, TBL, NSH, COL, DAL, NYR, BOS TOR FLA EDM VAN.

Without any material improvement this should be a bottom 6 team again
I get that everyone wants the flames to do well because of that pick, but don't see how they are a tier above the habs, they finished 5 points ahead and lost half of their defense, a top 6 center and their starting goalie.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Sorinth

McGees

Registered User
Jun 15, 2016
13,314
26,374
Our core is all young. They will be better because they will all be better.
Plus Dach returning is huge.
At this point I would think we end up picking 7-10. If we actually want to see a bigger jump or sniff a wildcard spot, we need to trade for a legit top 6 player which is exactly what I think Hughes has been trying to do.
 

Jaynki

Registered User
Feb 3, 2014
5,598
5,499
I think some of y'all forget the record number of 1 goal games they had last year. The team wasn't as bad as their record showed. With a healthy Dach and second half Slaf for the whole year, I expect and hope to see improvement.

I'm done with tanking, I want to see meaningful hockey again.

Not only this.

But around the 60 games mark

Primeau had a .500 record and Allen was 3-12 since november. You corrected Allen 3-12 to 7-8 (primeau stats) and we were 2 points from a wild card spot.

Obviously it doesnt work like this but trading Allen was an improvement by subtracting him.

Now, we have better goaltending, like you said record 1 goal games, healthy Dach, closer-to-prime Slaf and our entire core in fact, and if Hutson and Reinbacher/Mailloux are impact defenseman, we will improve by leaps and bounds.
 
  • Like
Reactions: FLHabs

RationalExpectations

Registered User
May 12, 2019
5,070
3,892
I get that everyone wants the flames to do well because of that pick, but don't see how they are a tier above the habs, they finished 5 points ahead and lost half of their defense, a top 6 center and their starting goalie.

This is true they lost a few guys but I am not sure Wolf can compensate Markstrom departure right away but for me they are not really in a rebuild phase with Weegar Andersson Kadri Sharangovich Huberdeau… I don t think they are great but I can t really consider them rebuilders at this stage I think.
 

Rapala

Registered User
Mar 29, 2013
40,281
36,239
Montreal
Nobody's saying about contending. However, the team goals for next season are no longer entirely divorced from the standings and we should adjust our strategy accordingly.

Unless of course everything we've heard from the management recently is bullshit.



Caufield and Slafkovsky were different caliber of prospects. Roy not being ready risks not only his development, but that of Dach and Newhook as well. Not to mention the stated team goals.
Yeah they talked up a storm on the optimism meter but I'm not sure how far we can get beyond just treading water as it stands.
Looking on paper and progression wise adding a Kirby Dach should give us a decent bump but he has to maintain it.
Monahan was really good for us early when Suzuki's line started a bit flat. We need the same from our second line next season.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Archijerej

FLHabs

Send all your underacheiving prospects!!
Feb 18, 2017
2,056
3,409
Not only this.

But around the 60 games mark

Primeau had a .500 record and Allen was 3-12 since november. You corrected Allen 3-12 to 7-8 (primeau stats) and we were 2 points from a wild card spot.

Obviously it doesnt work like this but trading Allen was an improvement by subtracting him.

Now, we have better goaltending, like you said record 1 goal games, healthy Dach, closer-to-prime Slaf and our entire core in fact, and if Hutson and Reinbacher/Mailloux are impact defenseman, we will improve by leaps and bounds.
Completely forgot about the improved goaltender situation. I think the Habs will surprise lots of people next year. The guys are extremely focused as well and are ready for the next step of the rebuild.
 

Wayfarer13

Registered User
Jun 21, 2020
354
140
Fact is, the Habs have done nothing to improve the roster that was bottom five last year, so why should it be any different this year? They're hoping every player takes a step forward and the collective improves to the point where they take the next step. It's plausible but improbable. Management said they want to be more competitive this year and are banking on the players they have to grow and take the next step. They tried to nab Marchessault and the summer is still relatively early so there is time for changes but as of today there is nothing to really grasp on to other than "vibes."

What's funny to me is that the media have all been like "this roster is going to be so different."

We'll see.
Don't have to have every player improve
The ones that don't improve maybe replaced by those coming up from behind
No guarantee but a reasonable expectation. No hurry to bring in outside help at this point.A reevaluation will be done after next season.The spectrum of success for next year us lottery pick to making the playoffs.
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad