Palat's also negative value, maybe even more than Anderson.
Palat probably has negative value as well, but not remotely close to Anderson.
Palat's also negative value, maybe even more than Anderson.
so $500.000 more dollars and better stats mean that Palat has more negative value then Anderson.Palat's also negative value, maybe even more than Anderson. It ultimately comes down to Xhekaj+Avs 2nd for 10th OA which is still a terrible trade for the Devils.
Because he's softer, smaller, slower, scores considerably less goals, and is more expensive?Palat probably has negative value as well, but not remotely close to Anderson.
You're going about it the wrong way is the biggest problem, is your proposal that bad? No not really. Is it at all what NJ would want for 10OA? No, they're not interested in trading down to add another prospect.Seems to be the canned response Devils fans use in every single proposal for the 10th . If you don’t want to trade it, just say that and spare everyone the histrionics and forced outrage. It’s a 10th overall pick, not Jack Hughes. Comparable picks have been traded recently for less than I proposed here.
Because he's softer, smaller, slower, scores considerably less goals, and is more expensive?
in your world 9 goals is more then 11?Because he's softer, smaller, slower, scores considerably less goals, and is more expensive?
Palat is old and pretty mucjh worthless now. Anderson should not be worth lot but GM's overrate size and speed.so $500.000 more dollars and better stats mean that Palat has more negative value then Anderson.
Okay.
Oh wait.. Somehow Andersons "physicality" makes him worth 10x more. I forgot.
gee thanks for the in-depth explanation. you convinced me.Palat is
Damn you're right, Palat's actually the physical one. He definitely has excellent value. Palat's probably bigger and faster than Anderson too right?Oh wait.. Somehow Andersons "physicality" makes him worth 10x more. I forgot.
Why are we going based on one season? How about the year before where Anderson had 21 and Palat had 8? If Palat's defensive metrics are so off the chart, you'd think he'd be used regularly on the PK for the Devils no? Yes Anderson sucks defensively, but don't pretend that Palat is some defensive monster. So you got Anderson being bigger, more physical, faster, better goalscorer, and cheaper while Palat is more skilled (and thus put up a bit more points), better defensively, and better playoff resume. How are they not similar in value? Don't pretend that they one's a bit of a negative value while the other is a massive cap dump. I think Palat is less valuable but I understand if you don't think that, they are way more similar in value than further apart.$500K in cap hit is negligible.
Palat had more goals than Anderson in less games last season.
Defensive metrics are off the chart in favor of Palat. Plus there's the whole playoff performance/experience factor.
In my world, I don't only look at one season. If in your world, one season is all that matters, please ask your GM to trade Mercer for Newhook since after all, Newhook has 1 more point in 27 fewer games this past season.in your world 9 goals is more then 11?
You're going about it the wrong way is the biggest problem, is your proposal that bad? No not really. Is it at all what NJ would want for 10OA? No, they're not interested in trading down to add another prospect.Seems to be the canned response Devils fans use in every single proposal for the 10th . If you don’t want to trade it, just say that and spare everyone the histrionics and forced outrage. It’s a 10th overall pick, not Jack Hughes. Comparable picks have been traded recently for less than I proposed here.
Your histrionic reaction here suggests it’s something akin to asking for Jack Hughes, that’s why I brought it up. Apparently that goes over your head.no it isn't and it's laughable that you think so. There's a reason why both Hab's fans and all other fanbases never like your trade threads.
saying "10th overall pick here, not Jack Hughes' might sound so smart that you feel the need to repeat it but it just shows how ignorant and disingenuous you are.
Nobody compared the 10th OV pick to Jack Hughes. You did.
you really don't look at stats do you?Damn you're right, Palat's actually the physical one. He definitely has excellent value. Palat's probably bigger and faster than Anderson too right?
Why are we going based on one season? How about the year before where Anderson had 21 and Palat had 8? If Palat's defensive metrics are so off the chart, you'd think he'd be used regularly on the PK for the Devils no? Yes Anderson sucks defensively, but don't pretend that Palat is some defensive monster. So you got Anderson being bigger, more physical, faster, better goalscorer, and cheaper while Palat is more skilled (and thus put up a bit more points), better defensively, and better playoff resume. How are they not similar in value? Don't pretend that they one's a bit of a negative value while the other is a massive cap dump. I think Palat is less valuable but I understand if you don't think that, they are way more similar in value than further apart.
In my world, I don't only look at one season. If in your world, one season is all that matters, please ask your GM to trade Mercer for Newhook since after all, Newhook has 1 more point in 27 fewer games this past season.
Mediocre bottom pairing D is quite generous for Xhekaj.Any time you can move a top 10 pick to get a mediocre bottom pairing D and a doofus that skates in a straight line that only provides value when scoring some goals (coming off 9 in 78 games), you have to pull the trigger.
You really don't read do you?you really don't look at stats do you?
Palat has been better then Andersson every recent season stat wise except for for the 2022-2023 season where he only played 49 games to Andersons. 69
Yeah teams need players like Josh Anderson for the playoffs.Palat is old and pretty mucjh worthless now. Anderson should not be worth lot but GM's overrate size and speed.
and Mailioux isn't even close to being worth the 10th.Mediocre bottom pairing D is quite generous for Xhekaj.
AHL caliber dman who can fight is a better description
and palat has more goals scored then Anderson last season and the only reason he didn't have more the season before that is because he missed games.You really don't read do you?
I discussed goalscoring. Anderson is a better goalscorer than Palat. That is a fact.
Take the L and move on since you can't chime in properly and are backtracking like crazy.
I cannot think of a player in the NHL who fits what NJD needs less than Xhekaj.I would understand the frustration if Devils fans were clamoring for Xhekaj and then talking him down (i.e. what happens with Necas and Zegras).
Much of the Xhekaj conversation is generated by Habs fans! Frankly, given his undrafted pedigree and sub 100 game sample of NHL play on a terrible team, he’s off the radar for most on this board.
A 2nd might get you from 13th overall to 10th.It probably takes something like Mailloux + 26th to get the Devils to give up the 10th. Xhekaj really isn’t worth much at this stage and the whole Anderson/Palat thing is just unnecessary, without even getting into any type of value discussion.
Normally, I’d say something like the 26th + a 2nd would be enough for a pick like 10th overall, but this draft is unusually stacked in the top 15 or so. There’s quite a significant drop off around ~16-17, so it’s going to take extra to trade into that.
Romanov: 22 year old, 21 minute a night, LD whos defensively sound and kills penalties.Sorry, but no way Xhekaj has more value than Romanov did at the time. I'm a big fan of Arber, but he is very much a project. Romanov had already proved to be an NHLer and had pedigree.
Why are we going based on one season? How about the year before where Anderson had 21 and Palat had 8? If Palat's defensive metrics are so off the chart, you'd think he'd be used regularly on the PK for the Devils no? Yes Anderson sucks defensively, but don't pretend that Palat is some defensive monster. So you got Anderson being bigger, more physical, faster, better goalscorer, and cheaper while Palat is more skilled (and thus put up a bit more points), better defensively, and better playoff resume. How are they not similar in value? Don't pretend that they one's a bit of a negative value while the other is a massive cap dump. I think Palat is less valuable but I understand if you don't think that, they are way more similar in value than further apart.
You can't be serious... Palat is still a very good player, even if he didn't pile up points this year.Palat's also negative value, maybe even more than Anderson.
It’s really interesting how this works. Since it’s a Habs player, he gets the value of his potential. Never mind the fact that he couldn’t stick in the NHL and was demoted to the AHL. No, that’s preposterous, he should be valued based on his absolute ceiling! (IE a top ten pick or more). But, when it comes to another teams player, such as Zegras, it’s no longer about his potential or even the fact that he’s already had 60+ points in both his first two full seasons. It’s all about his injury riddled season and will this now be the player he is going forward. In fact, because of that, he’s now barely worthy a first round pick.
Your histrionic reaction here suggests it’s something akin to asking for Jack Hughes, that’s why I brought it up. Apparently that goes over your head.
And here’s a hint: if you don’t like a proposal or an opinion, just ignore it instead of crying about it. I’ve told you this before. Obviously you still aren’t getting that, but I wish you would because posts like this add nothing to the discussion, but you do it constantly. This one in particular borders on flaming, so maybe keep that in mind.
We are allowed to share opinions here, even if it’s something @Xirik disagrees with. Get over it.
We don't have to base it on one season and you're right - historically, Anderson is the better goal scorer...a fact that is reflected by the individual XGoals on his player card compared to Palat.
However, Palat is ahead of him on every other single metric and the market value favors Palat $4.7M to $0.8M for Anderson, which is a rather wide gap. Sure, these cards (and other versions, which also favor Palat) are not the end all, be all in this debate - but when that gap is that wide among an independent source (in this case, The Athletic)...I think it's a fairly good indicator of which player is likely better overall.
View attachment 884953
View attachment 884954