I am not a Canucks fan, so I'm not "you guys" and I don't think the Canucks "blew" anything, they made an excellent trade to fill a serious need on their roster when the acquired Lindholm.
The fact that you are claiming an offer of Nils Hoglander, Aatu Raty and a 1st round draft pick is "Vancouvers trash" tells me everything I need to know about you and your knowledge of the game and the league.
Certainly enough evidence that I know I have no reason to continue any kind of hockey conversation with you, that's for sure.
Woof. Let me get my crayons.
1. I don't have a directory of who everyone's "team" is. If you're here arguing value for Vancouver, I'm lumping you in as a Vancouver fan. So sue me.
2. The Lindholm trade was indeed a good trade for them but they still paid good assets for him. If your angst is that I said "blew", f***ing whatever man. Semantics. Replace it with "spent" if your mentality fragility needs it that bad". The point was, if Vancouver had Kuzmenko, Jurmo, Hunter Brzustewicz,
2024 1st round pick, and a conditional 2024 4th round pick (NJD) in addition to what they have now, they could likely may a very strong pitch for Guentzel. Something like Brzustewicz, Raty, 1st is something that we would have likely taken rather quickly. But as my post clearly stated, because those assets are now gone, Vancouver is left with top tier assets - Lekkerimaki, Wallander, and Hoglander or lower-tier B/C level prospects - Raty, Podkolzin, Bains, Dries, EP2, 3rds, 4ths, etc. There is a gap in that middle ground of assets where you likely can't get a Guentzel level player unless you give up one of the top tier assets. That's like the entire point Penguins fans are trying to make here with Vancouver fans who want to give up nothing of value.
3. I NEVER, EVER claimed THAT particular proposal was a bad offer. Quote me saying so hot shot. In fact, that would be in line with what most Penguins fans are wanting as the return from Vancouver given the available options. It is Vancouver fans saying that it's too much because they are overvaluing Hoglander (in addition to reports that they don't want to give up anything of value).
4. If you move past Lekkerimaki, Walliander, Hoglander, and their 1st which everyone says are assets they don't want to give up, then YES, you are looking at assets that are, more or less, trash with the exception being Raty as a decent B-level prospect that would be commonly traded in deals like his (as evidence by the fact that he was traded in a very similar deal just last year).
When you move past Raty it get's pretty bleak for assets that would entice the Penguins to trade Guentzel. Podkolzin, Bains, Dries, EP2, 2025/26 2nds, a 2024 3rd...these aren't great assets to be offering up to the Penguins when there are other teams that can beat it pretty easily.
This isn't hard man. Penguins fans are hardly being unreasonable when our long-term first-line LW who is a 40g impact player is available for trade.