Grip it N RYP it
Registered User
Chytil could get an upper-body injury tripping on a pebble, or get concussed answering his phone.
Good god man.2.52x1.19=2.999… don’t be so pedantic.
Mistake? Depends on which team. For a bunch of teams that are lacking talent and is limited in what they can get, overpaying slightly for a guy like Hog is fine. When the cap is at 97M next year, overpaying a guy like by 500k on a 3M contract doesn’t make a difference. The difference is not having 1 more guy that moves the team forward and the opportunity cost.
No .unless Miller is actually wanting out we are not moving him.Would people now do Filip Chytil, Braden Schneider and a 1st for Miller?
All you keep repeating is that "he would not clear waivers". As I've said repeatedly, yes, I agree. I think he would be claimed if waived.Jc did you read any of the multiple posts by multiple people on why he might have value?!
The point is the narrative that he has not much value (wwaivers) should be dead based on what we now know to be accurate information.
That's it.
By whomever was making such statements, idc who made what claims, that narrative is dead. tI dont need to prove anything. To disprove a narrative that is very easy to see with all the teams scouting and having interest in Hoglander.
It is reality idk what you're arguing.
No "previous comparables" are necessary or required by me or you or anyone to prove anything because we're specifically talking about Hoglander and if he's waiver tier"not much" value or not.
Again the number doesn't matter, it doesn't matter if anyone thinks his contract is a negative, we know it's not because multiple teams are interested and atleast willing to talk top4D in return, we don't know what or who adds plusses yet.
That's it.
Hoglander has more than not much value, his contract is not a negative and he would never have cleared waivers. Those narratives are dead, Those opinions are incorrect and ppl who hold them should reevaluate their positions.
It's like anyone who was hypothetically arguing boeser value was not much or would clear waivers (again both of which happened and both can easilybe found with a search, not saying you) because struggling or contract or whatever, they were incorrect. It was an opinion we know now to be incorrect based on available information.
We don't need skilled winger comparables to boeser from before, or math, or logic or anything else. That narrative was not correct and those people should've re-evaluated their opinions because they turned out to be incorrect.
We also now know the narrative Hoglander is low value or bad contract to be incorrect, because we will soon see him traded for value. How much exactly we don't know yet, I say decent to good value, others say we have to add a 1st to get provorov.
We will also soon see which one is correct.
That's it.
Hoglander has more than not much value, his contract is not a negative and he would never have cleared waivers. Those narratives are dead, those opinions are incorrect.
Bring KJ home.I could envision a scenario where the Blue Jackets are willing to pay a big price to bring in a star forward after what happened with Gaudreau. Miller might be a rare star player that would actually wnat to be there given his family connection to the state. It's hard to see how this would benefit Vancouver in the short term but if CBJ is desperate I bet they could put together a pretty nice package.
Good god man.
The $2.38M figure was the amount already "adjusted for cap inflation". Now you're saying it's 2.52 for some reason, and adding more cap inflation on top of it.
And you've just told the game right here. You said it yourself. "Slight overpayment". i.e. the Hoglander extension is an overpayment. If it's an overpayment, that mean's the extension itself is a net negative on his trade value.
Thank you for supporting my point.
I think a savvy GM should be willing to trade every player and prospect if someone offers the moon. But that isn’t happening. And if that “other player” happened to be EP, I don’t think EP would be the one going.Absent am outright trade demand, the idea we would or should move JT is mental.
If there is (unresolvable) friction between him and another player.....see you later other player (unless it's Quinn Hughes).
If it's between him and the coach, work through it.
If he's just become an intolerable grump because he's hurt and can't perform the way he's used to performing.....let him heal.
This is the day the Canucks said Miller is coming back.
Anymore Hronek news?
December 6th, Swift's concert. Canucks play.
Parking and traffic will be so much fun.
This is the day the Canucks said Miller is coming back.
Anymore Hronek news?
December 6th, Swift's concert. Canucks play.
Parking and traffic will be so much fun.
Yeah he’s not with the team on the road…Minor point, but the Canucks have said absolutely nothing about a possible timeframe for Miller's return. All there has been is speculation.
With TSwift, Canucks, and shit downtown will reach 2010 Olympics level of capacity. Her last stop of her tour, there’s thousands coming in to gather.This is the day the Canucks said Miller is coming back.
Anymore Hronek news?
December 6th, Swift's concert. Canucks play.
Parking and traffic will be so much fun.
No. It's $2.39M. Which is what I said. You've pulled $2.52 out of nowhere for some reason.wtf you can’t read? I said yes you are right, 3M!=2M its 2.52M after adjusting.
I think you are way over indexing on the concept of overpayment. Overpayment is not like an issue for teams that are lacking in talent. For them they would rather trade for a player that could be slightly overpaid than to have no player at all and be stuck at the same spot. Not moving the team forward is more damaging than paying a guy like 500k more.
Also we are getting the calls right now for Hog, it’s the other teams that wants him and we are not desperate to sell him at this moment and we have seen how patient Allvin is when it comes to selling.
I don't see EP leading this team to a cup. If i squint hard enough, I can get there with JT. I believe if both are playing at their best, we have a shot (assuming we have a healthy team) and this is still my preferred route unless Staios loses his mind and Brady hits market.I think a savvy GM should be willing to trade every player and prospect if someone offers the moon. But that isn’t happening. And if that “other player” happened to be EP, I don’t think EP would be the one going.
You want the Canucks to go into a rebuild and the Rangers to go onto the Stanley cup?Unless a younger and established two-way center is a part of the deal, you do not move Miller.
Maybe we can pull off something like the Huberdeau deal.
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|