Jimmy Firecracker
They Fired Sheldon!
Make a World Cup out of it. That's the kind of tournaments North Americans like.
We're also pretty fond of the Olympics.
Make a World Cup out of it. That's the kind of tournaments North Americans like.
We're also pretty fond of the Olympics.
We're also pretty fond of the Olympics.
Sweden missed their 3 top centers + first and second captain in the final game
Well Olympics is not going to be the same tbh without NHL players
Do you realize how pathetic this excuse is? And it's getting old since EVERY FREAKING YEAR this comes up.Versus:
Crosby, McDavid, Tavares, Seguin, Benn, Weber, Letang, Giordano, Subban, Burns, Price, Getzlaf...
I mean, there's a pretty big gap between the players Sweden was missing and Canada was missing.
Make a team out of the players Canada is missing, versus the players Sweden is missing, and Canada probably wins by 10+.
but surely you will still watch it?
It doesn't really matter in the end. Canada could have won the game and the team that came is the team that came. I don't really see the point in under cutting the team that won just congratulate them and move on. Just my opinion.
Basically this. If we're good enough to win, and we were this year, the other team deserves credit for beating us. We had every chance to win gold but sweden got the winDo you realize how pathetic this excuse is? And it's getting old since EVERY FREAKING YEAR this comes up.
When Canada wins, fans like you say: "This is only our D team and we still won."
When Canada loses, fans say: "This is our D team, we're missing our best players."
So which is it? Does Canada has depth or not? You people can't seem to decide.
Do you realize how pathetic this excuse is? And it's getting old since EVERY FREAKING YEAR this comes up.
When Canada wins, fans like you say: "This is only our D team and we still won."
When Canada loses, fans say: "This is our D team, we're missing our best players."
So which is it? Does Canada has depth or not? You people can't seem to decide.
Of course someone like you wouldn't see the sense out of this, somehow I'm not surprised.This doesn't even make sense. Why are they mutually exclusive? Yes, Canada has depth. No, the depth is not good enough to win tournaments against top tier countries like in the past.
Make a World Cup out of it. That's the kind of tournaments North Americans like.
H. Lundqvist played injured. He told the reporters now that he thought that he wouldn't be able to play earlier today. Some issue with one of the knees.
No idea who the better team was. And we'll never know.
I don't understand the last part.After 80 minutes of more or less even hockey, would 1 goal in the 2nd OT period really make that team better ? Especially if it's a fluke bounce or something like that.
This game was already at a point that even it OT it was a coin flip.. Chances both ways, just a matter of time before someone cashed in and it could've been either team.
If you really want to know which team were better then you'd have to play a best of 7 series.
Congrats to Sweden for winning the gold. Always fun to see someone beating Canada even when they play their best.
I don't understand the last part.
I don't understand the last part.
I guess he ment Sweden had their best team to beat Canada
Do you realize how pathetic this excuse is? And it's getting old since EVERY FREAKING YEAR this comes up.
When Canada wins, fans like you say: "This is only our D team and we still won."
When Canada loses, fans say: "This is our D team, we're missing our best players."
So which is it? Does Canada have depth or not? You people can't seem to decide.