They both were bums really.
It was guys like Morrison, Cooke, Linden, Klatt, Ohlund, Salo... who came through in the clutch.
I saw a post in HOH that talked about Bertuzzi that I thought was quite accurate. In all his series’ with the Canucks, he started off dominant in Games 1-3. But then he would taper off, usually because he was engaged in battle with whichever gritty defensemen was matched up against him. The poster went on to say he got distracted with winning the battles rather than the war, and I think that sums him up pretty well.
Naslund and Morrison still managed to play their game, strike on the PP, and provide offense. But without the third piece of that line operating at full tilt, it was nowhere near as effective. Bertuzzi was the weakest link of those three, IMO, because he got too easily side tracked from the task at hand. Which sucks, because he could have dominated those series’ by controlling himself a bit more.