GDT: [GM19] Canucks vs Sharks | Mon. Nov 20th, 7pm | SNP | Blood in the Water

Status
Not open for further replies.

Chaos Giraffe

Registered User
Dec 1, 2004
2,859
608
Vancouver
Slam the back of someone’s head against the ice hard and you’ll find out what the difference is
I disagree with what happened on the play.

I don't think "slam the back of someone's head against the ice hard" is even remotely close to what happened. I saw Hoglander basically manhandle him to the ice, roughing imo.
 

wonton15

Kiefer Sherwood
Dec 13, 2009
20,850
30,908
Sat Shah speaks a little bit too fast. Can barely make out what he’s saying sometimes

I wonder how often he gets a hair cut
 

MS

1%er
Mar 18, 2002
56,172
93,517
Vancouver, BC
I agree with @MS

After seeing the replay, that was a slew foot.

But I do take issue with the NHL's consistency in applying attempt to injure rules

because I don't think hog intentionally did what he did there

but you'll see players take two hand slashes or cross checks to players in vulnerable positions, or intentional headshots etc whatever like really vile shit that can alter a player's career and it's just looked past

but that slew foot is what gets actual in game punishment idk just interesting

To me that hit on Garland in the 1st was much more dangerous. The inconsistency is strange.
 

Paulinbc

Registered User
Sep 5, 2015
3,616
1,777
I disagree with what happened on the play.

I don't think "slam the back of someone's head against the ice hard" is even remotely close to what happened. I saw Hoglander basically manhandle him to the ice, roughing imo.
It’s potentially very dangerous. The potential is why it’s a serious penalty.

That play has less of a chance to injure somebody than any given hit in Football. Should we ban the NFL?
Nooooooes!!! I need something to do on Sundays.
 

bandwagonesque

Practically a late 1st
Mar 5, 2014
7,574
5,994
My wife is so confused. Not necessarily about why it's a match penalty but why that is punished more than punching someone in the face. Her argument is that there's nothing with more intent to injure than punching the head.
There's honestly no way to answer this question. Except to say the answer to all "why?" questions is identical -- because it just is.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Vector

valkynax

The LEEDAR
Sponsor
May 19, 2011
11,221
12,833
Burnaby
It’s potentially very dangerous. The potential is why it’s a serious penalty.


Nooooooes!!! I need something to do on Sundays.

Reminds me of when Homer tried to buy a pistol and background check deemed him potentially dangerous.

Which means he's allowed 3 hand guns or less lol.
 

VanillaCoke

Registered User
Oct 30, 2013
26,417
13,116
Like its a clear slewfoot, dangerous play, idk how anyone cannot see that esp with multiple replays cmon.

Completely warranted penalty, sure maybe inconsistently applied but thats the nhl. Sat amd imac sound like idiots if you watch the play even 3 seconds earlier hog is pissed at labanc coming in high ish and slew foots him down.

I wouldn't be at all shocked with a one game suspension, and yes Marchand should have 20x more than he does. F him.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Paulinbc

Paulinbc

Registered User
Sep 5, 2015
3,616
1,777
tripping sure, 5 min major? if that's a major Brad Marchand would have like 50 majors in his career.
Multiply this by 10 and you’re closer

Reminds me of when Homer tried to buy a pistol and background check deemed him potentially dangerous.

Which means he's allowed 3 hand guns or less lol.
Did he still get to go through the express lane?
 

Kryten

slightly regarded
Sponsor
Sep 29, 2011
16,622
14,233
Kootenays
To me that hit on Garland in the 1st was much more dangerous. The inconsistency is strange.
That was during play though, there wasnt really a need for Hog to do that. NHL is still wildly inconsistent with this shit though. Like manginapains BS against McCann should have been quite a few games suspension
 
  • Like
Reactions: LordBacon

Paulinbc

Registered User
Sep 5, 2015
3,616
1,777
This is electric, this is beautiful…. With two guys sitting on the bench looking at an iPad lol.
 

valkynax

The LEEDAR
Sponsor
May 19, 2011
11,221
12,833
Burnaby
Multiply this by 10 and you’re closer


Did he still get to go through the express lane?

Don't know if express lane existed back then.

I do know in a much later episode he ended up with a minigun.
3e6U.gif
 
  • Like
Reactions: Paulinbc

MS

1%er
Mar 18, 2002
56,172
93,517
Vancouver, BC
Like its a clear slewfoot, dangerous play, idk how anyone cannot see that esp with multiple replays cmon.

Completely warranted penalty, sure maybe inconsistently applied but thats the nhl. Sat amd imac sound like idiots if you watch the play even 3 seconds earlier hog is pissed at labanc coming in high ish gets pissed and slew foots him.

The issue is the consistency.

I don’t theoretically have a problem with the call but we’ve seen far worse than this to our players over the past few years and it wasn’t called like this.
 

moiderer

Registered User
Jul 28, 2021
1,446
1,639
Vancouver
David Amber's kind of a milquetoast guy, but Sportsnet sidelining him to weekday panels while Ron Maclean waffles on HNIC is a disgrace.

Also love that he's a national guy who regularly pumps up the Canucks.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Ad

Ad

Ad