Is to of the when cause
The Bains of our existence
Take the win, but need to keep getting better. Happy with pretty much everyone's individual efforts, buy structure play still has room to improve.
Crazy set of balls on Allvin to not blink vs Lankinen. Where are we right now if he ended up signing elsewhere?
Powerplay needs new batteries or something. But nice having a PK that doesn't fill me full of dread.
Your logic is flawed. Alternate is just saying our GM wasn’t first to cave, especially given the circumstances. For you to gender his statement is confusing.What does this mean? Do females not have the balls to pull off this? Just throwing thought bombs out there
They said it took balls to hold off on something. That sure sounds like a gender statement to meYour logic is flawed. Alternate is just saying our GM wasn’t first to cave, especially given the circumstances. For you to gender his statement is confusing.
They said it took balls to hold off on something. That sure sounds like a gender statement to me
Caption this onto Peteys new smirk pictureIs to of the when cause
Torts post game presser. He called the Flyers ‘sloppy’ and ‘flat’.
I was perfectly fine until I got randomly piled on for nothing.Trimmed some fat in this thread.
Let’s not make things personal, and remember the site rules. For f***s sakes, we got a shutout tonight - celebrate!
I've been reading you and @MS game reviews for like 20 years now and I always make time for them. Always on point.Improved, but still needed great goal tending and some luck around the net to win.
Good
Lankinen - story of the year so far. Has been excellent.
Garland - most often the player bailing the team out of bad situations and again creating numerous offensive chances
Hronek - best d-man. Thought he carried Hughes in the defensive end.
Sherwood - lot of grunt work and a nice goal. Best of the 4th liners (Aman a little better here as well)
Blueger - key on the PK and another good game holding line togetner. Real good season to date
Boeser - showing last year's play, as far as good two way play is concerned, is continuing, Back check, which was non-existant a couple of year's ago is now NHL standard.
Others
Pettersson - to me, just not supporting the play with any smarts. Example in the second where Soucy is battling a Flyer near the corner and Pettersson goes into the play and gets behind Soucy leaving a lane open to the net. Flyer knocks the puck free and goes driectly to the net and Pettersson is left uselessly standing in the corner. You see this repeatly - Pettersson taking himself out of the play to make a meaningless hit or over engaging in the play when a teammate is already in the play, ending up with two men on the puck and an opponent wide open. On the occassion when he was well positioned and not tangled up with someone he was able to take Garland's pass and set up Hoglander. That should be his game rather than being taggled up in scrums. (and in many of those cases falling down). Got to somehow learn the sometimes less is more.
I don't think he had a bad game and try is there, but he still looks immature in his reads and positioning and you have to hope he overcomes that..
Miller - you wonder if he broke his hand in that fight in the opener. Would explain his trouble in taking and giving passes. If so, give him kudos for his effort this season.
Myers - - him and Soucy had to a lot of the hard load in this game . Played a lot and were important to the win although it was not very tidy at times. Myers made a very good play on the Boeser goal
Brannstrom - so far, so good. Could be an important pick up. Helped Desharnais have a better game.
de Brusk - beginning to show more. Team really needs him to become good and he is showing improved speed.
Sprong - actually good on the fore check - especially in the third. However, can see he has tunnel vision at times. That's one explanation why he has been bounced around and why he has trouble playing off what others are doing.
Canucks still haven't played a full game but are, at least, hanging in as far as the standing are.
Find it somewhat hilarious management didn't really like Brannstrom, took him as a dump, waived him, and now he's en route to being the team's at least 5th best defenseman. But yeah, let's put a bunch of Forborts on the bottom pair.
I honestly don't know what Heinen does out there. He is invisible on every shift.The good: Hoglander, Miller, Petey, Garland, Boeser, DeBrusk, Suter, Blueger, Sherwood, Hughes, Hronek, Myers, Soucy, Brannstrom, Desharnais, Lakkinen, Silovs, Aman, Sprong
The bad: Heinen