Burrowsaurus
Registered User
- Mar 20, 2013
- 44,178
- 17,260
To what. ImChanged his name?
Not sure how to see that on mobile
To what. ImChanged his name?
Well we needed picks. But also I don’t think they know what a decent bottom of the lineup bet looks like.Namestikov is a guy Dorion got for a 4th round pick and he’s making $2 million in Detroit and is a solid pro and is playing good hockey. Instead of recycling through Stepan, Galechenyuk, Dznigel, Gauedette why not just sign this guy to a 3 year deal and stabilize your bottom 6.
Namestikinov isn’t going to complete your rebuild but instead of all the headaches and bad press the other players you brought in not to mention the assets (2nd for Stepan) but he just would of stabilized you a bit and helped add some skill and an NHL vet.
Traded him for a 4th and got the 4th back - should of just kept him and not have to make 24 other decisions none of which look good trying to replace a bottom 6 player
Namestikov is a guy Dorion got for a 4th round pick and he’s making $2 million in Detroit and is a solid pro and is playing good hockey. Instead of recycling through Stepan, Galechenyuk, Dznigel, Gauedette why not just sign this guy to a 3 year deal and stabilize your bottom 6.
Namestikinov isn’t going to complete your rebuild but instead of all the headaches and bad press the other players you brought in not to mention the assets (2nd for Stepan) but he just would of stabilized you a bit and helped add some skill and an NHL vet.
Traded him for a 4th and got the 4th back - should of just kept him and not have to make 24 other decisions none of which look good trying to replace a bottom 6 player
If I had to guess I would have guessed more than 6 points. Damn. And three of those came in one game.
and him excelling also wouldnt be surprising considering his totals in the AHLThis is basically Brown's last chance to prove he is NHL material and, to his credit, he is making the most of it so far.
The challenge of the NHL is to be good often, we will see if Brown can keep it up. Him fading wouldn't be very surprising considering his track record.
and him excelling also wouldnt be surprising considering his totals in the AHL
Lots of players do well in the AHL but cannot cut it in the NHL. His shortcomings (mediocre skater and injury prone) aren't things that are easy to fix.
Just another player we have drafted , spent some time developing, that became unhappy with the opportunity provided by a struggling team with one of the worst bottom 6es in the league, and, ultimately gave up on in favor of seemingly less.
It's funny how quick some were to claim wewon the trade because Sanford was contributing in the NHL...I'd take a Logan Brown on our third line right now over Sanford.
sure they do but lots also do well cause they did well in the AHLLots of players do well in the AHL but cannot cut it in the NHL. His shortcomings (mediocre skater and injury prone) aren't things that are easy to fix and players doing well when they are on their last leg is common.
I hope he makes it but expecting him to, right now, seems misplaced.
It's funny how quick some were to claim wewon the trade because Sanford was contributing in the NHL...
I liked Brown the year we drafted him, I saw lots of good in his callups prior to last year. His injuries really got in the way of him breaking into the lineup, and it doesn't help that he really doesn't seem to be a DJ style player.
I think he would have done better in another teams development program, he just didn't align with what this team was trying to build, it would have been nice if we had recognized that earlier on before investing so much time in him and seeing his value plummet. I think there was also a fair degree of conflict between the team and his father (gotta love drafting those bloodlines)
Hope he can have continued success in StL, the talent is certainly there,
If I had to guess I would have guessed more than 6 points. Damn. And three of those came in one game.
it would be the most senators thing ever if we trade him for a 4th at the deadline only to give up a 4th in the logan brown dealOur newly extended GM thinks Sanford was a great addition to the team.
I doubt any other team will be interested in acquiring Sanford at the TDL, nor the waiver wire.
Our newly extended GM thinks Sanford was a great addition to the team.
I doubt any other team will be interested in acquiring Sanford at the TDL, nor the waiver wire.
it would be the most senators thing ever if we trade him for a 4th at the deadline only to give up a 4th in the logan brown deal
So around the time Dorion signed his extension?
I am not sure if his 2mill dollar cap hit would be taken off the waiver wireSanford would get claimed in a second. He'll return something... just how much will depend on his play down the stretch.
I was one of L. Brown's biggest supporters, but he wanted out and it wasnt working out for him here. Sanford, for his part, has been one of our better bottom 6ers imo. It's a low bar.
This is probably what will happen - we will give up a high 4th and return a late 4th. Namestnikov 2.0. Mayyyybe a late 3rd if we take back bad salary and/or he really heats up.
Yeah that track record of getting so many opportunities to play in a scoring role.... He was always going to take a long time to get here and the sens knew that. Then you compound the injuries and covid and it took even longer. The problem here is Ottawa knew the type of player they were drafting and still took this approach in his development. We all know the reason why too, Dorion is too insecure and wants to blame someone else, so instead of sticking with it here we are. Hence the rebuild is over comments. Now its another throw away year and this is what we get. He would likely be the second line center right now if they had an ounce of patience.This is basically Brown's last chance to prove he is NHL material and, to his credit, he is making the most of it so far.
The challenge of the NHL is to be good often, we will see if Brown can keep it up. Him fading wouldn't be very surprising considering his track record.
He is a fine player in a bottom 6 role, but these players arent hard to aquire. He wasnt protected in expansion, probably could have been had for way cheaper if they had just traded him when they could have lost him for nothing.Our newly extended GM thinks Sanford was a great addition to the team.
I doubt any other team will be interested in acquiring Sanford at the TDL, nor the waiver wire.
Eh, teams have space. 11 teams could fit him without LTIR, 9 other teams could fit him with LTIR. A handful of teams who are "competing" have $10+ mil in space.I am not sure if his 2mill dollar cap hit would be taken off the waiver wire
Sanford would get claimed in a second. He'll return something... just how much will depend on his play down the stretch.
I was one of L. Brown's biggest supporters, but he wanted out and it wasnt working out for him here. Sanford, for his part, has been one of our better bottom 6ers imo. It's a low bar.
This is probably what will happen - we will give up a high 4th and return a late 4th. Namestnikov 2.0. Mayyyybe a late 3rd if we take back bad salary and/or he really heats up.
Perhaps at the deadline where they minimize his cap hitEh, teams have space. 11 teams could fit him without LTIR, 9 other teams could fit him with LTIR. A handful of teams who are "competing" have $10+ mil in space.