I mean, if we're being honest, we're winning games because of the of the young core players Dorion has assembled. Which bodes really really well for the future.
It's not like we're winning games off the backs of ageing vets we could have kept.
I also find it a bit silly that we're so fixated on minor deals like MDZ, when his two biggest moves this offseason were signing Tkachuk and Batherson to long term deals. With the Batherson deal looking like it could be the best deal of any player in the NHL.
I also find it a bit silly that we're so fixated on minor deals like MDZ, when his two biggest moves this offseason were signing Tkachuk and Batherson to long term deals. With the Batherson deal looking like it could be the best deal of any player in the NHL.
If only he added a top 4 D. That's the thing with Dorion, he needs to do not what's obvious, but what's needed.
He doesn't have the killer instinct we need. And we will need it this off-season to make the next jump.
It takes him longer to do what other teams consider a nobrainer and then whifs on everything else.If only he added a top 4 D. That's the thing with Dorion, he needs to do not what's obvious, but what's needed.
He doesn't have the killer instinct we need. And we will need it this off-season to make the next jump.
I also find it a bit silly that we're so fixated on minor deals like MDZ, when his two biggest moves this offseason were signing Tkachuk and Batherson to long term deals. With the Batherson deal looking like it could be the best deal of any player in the NHL.
he signed his own RFAs?I also find it a bit silly that we're so fixated on minor deals like MDZ, when his two biggest moves this offseason were signing Tkachuk and Batherson to long term deals. With the Batherson deal looking like it could be the best deal of any player in the NHL.
Honestly though how difficult is it for GM'S to sign their players to extensions? You know how many great RFA deals were signed this past summer? This arguement is weak, if the best move a GM makes over the summer is signing an RFA, then that says alot.
Signing your RFA is the expectation, failing to sign them would be a disaster. Realistically speaking, Batherson got what the market was getting for guys with his experience and statline. Him taking a huge leap forward makes it a great deal, not saying Dorion should get no credit, but the credit he gets should be related to what an expected outcome would have been. Every other team in the league likely gets Batherson to sign to a similar deal.I also find it a bit silly that we're so fixated on minor deals like MDZ, when his two biggest moves this offseason were signing Tkachuk and Batherson to long term deals. With the Batherson deal looking like it could be the best deal of any player in the NHL.
tkachuk had to be overpaid for his production though to sign long term. Its the same for Toronto's coreSure, signing RFAs is not particularly hard. But signing them long term? At a good rate? Just look at how much Toronto is spending on their core. Matthew Tkachuk only signed a bridge with Calgary. Even this past offseason: Pettersson only signed a bridge deal. Kaprizov only 5yrs at $9m(!!).
Nailing down Tkachuk for 7yrs was a huge huge deal. And getting Batherson at $4.9m is a f***ing joke. Batherson needs to fire his agent.
Signing your RFA is the expectation, failing to sign them would be a disaster. Realistically speaking, Batherson got what the market was getting for guys with his experience and statline. Him taking a huge leap forward makes it a great deal, not saying Dorion should get no credit, but the credit he gets should be related to what an expected outcome would have been. Every other team in the league likely gets Batherson to sign to a similar deal.
That's because Batherson should have signed a bridge deal. But Dorion has done a great job of building such a good atmosphere for these kids that Batherson took the risk of going 6yrs, knowing full well there was a chance he'd get severely underpaid. Then, Dorion stood his ground on getting Tkachuk to commit long term.
Everyone gave credit to Dorion for the Batherson deal and almost everyone supported Dorion during the Tkachuk negotiations knowing he would have to over pay, and when the deal was done, Dorion got a ton of "high fives" for nailing a 7 year term rather than 1-5.
With that said, why should those two good things he did give him more slack than he deserves for the multitude of terrible moves he has done?
Our point is that signing great RFA deals is not enough to justify making many many moves detrimental to the team's success.
How many moves were detrimental this past off-season? MDZ? That's it? Mayyybe only extending Zub for 2yrs?
Good moves:
Tkachuk extension
Batherson extension
Forsberg extension
Holden + 3rd for Dadonov
Ennis as UFA
Gambrell for 7th
maybe Sanford (maybe this one is a wash)
He should have signed a bridge deal? He signed the same type of deal farabee did, or Konecny, Erikson ek or White.That's because Batherson should have signed a bridge deal. But Dorion has done a great job of building such a good atmosphere for these kids that Batherson took the risk of going 6yrs, knowing full well there was a chance he'd get severely underpaid. Then, Dorion stood his ground on getting Tkachuk to commit long term.
And getting Batherson at $4.9m is a f***ing joke. Batherson needs to fire his agent.
Those were no brainer come onI also find it a bit silly that we're so fixated on minor deals like MDZ, when his two biggest moves this offseason were signing Tkachuk and Batherson to long term deals. With the Batherson deal looking like it could be the best deal of any player in the NHL.
A deal like Matt Duchene, I don't get as upset because I understand the rationale and what he was trying to do.
Murray, Stepan, DZ, these were intended to fill a need that we didn't even have.