AchtzehnBaby
Global Matador
Yes. Something up. I get logged out when I go to the Leafs page…. Thought it was on purpose…Anyone else keep getting logged out of HFBoards
What device and what browser?
Yes. Something up. I get logged out when I go to the Leafs page…. Thought it was on purpose…Anyone else keep getting logged out of HFBoards
Its a sign.Anyone else keep getting logged out of HFBoards
Yes. Something up. I get logged out when I go to the Leafs page…. Thought it was on purpose…
What device and what browser?
Android. Google chrome.Its a sign.
What platform?
Dude change your passwordAnyone else keep getting logged out of HFBoards
I'm on chrome w no issues. Not Android though. Could it be a Cookie setting in Chrome got changed?Android. Google chrome.
It is being looked into…. Kinda weird - you can go back to page and u are still logged in…I'm on chrome w no issues. Not Android though. Could it be a Cookie setting in Chrome got changed?
To your point, isn't it just really a discussion about titles? Wouldn't any GM that reports to a VP or P of hockey ops be really just an AGM because they don't have final say?I’m starting to think Dorion and Bowness both keep their jobs with Andlauer bringing in a POHO and maybe a Sr Advisor.
In this scenario Dorion stays as GM but he would not have the final say in Hockey Ops decisions, he would in reality be more of an AGM, he’s already paid like an AGM.
Would it still constitute constructive dismissal if the position of POHO was already established within the org chart, but left vacant? I'm also not sure Dorion has ever had final say, he's been going through the board, no? Prior to that, perhaps Melnyk (for example, coaching hires had to go to Barbados even in the days of Murray...)?To your point, isn't it just really a discussion about titles? Wouldn't any GM that reports to a VP or P of hockey ops be really just an AGM because they don't have final say?
I wonder how that might play out legally. Currently PD is GM and has final say. If you bring in a POHO, that position has final say. In the non hockey world, that's constructive dismissal.
To your first question, no it wouldn't be assuming his job description noted that's where he reports.Would it still constitute constructive dismissal if the position of POHO was already established within the org chart, but left vacant? I'm also not sure Dorion has ever had final say, he's been going through the board, no? Prior to that, perhaps Melnyk (for example, coaching hires had to go to Barbados even in the days of Murray...)?
To your point, isn't it just really a discussion about titles? Wouldn't any GM that reports to a VP or P of hockey ops be really just an AGM because they don't have final say?
I wonder how that might play out legally. Currently PD is GM and has final say. If you bring in a POHO, that position has final say. In the non hockey world, that's constructive dismissal.
They definitely don't have the control that they would want, as we just saw with the Dubas/Shanahan situation. Dubas wanted more control, and he got it in Pittsburgh.To your point, isn't it just really a discussion about titles? Wouldn't any GM that reports to a VP or P of hockey ops be really just an AGM because they don't have final say?
I wonder how that might play out legally. Currently PD is GM and has final say. If you bring in a POHO, that position has final say. In the non hockey world, that's constructive dismissal.
Ok to the point I am making and I'll add a few others because a few guys have chimed inThey definitely don't have the control that they would want, as we just saw with the Dubas/Shanahan situation. Dubas wanted more control, and he got it in Pittsburgh.
I don't think it would be an issue, as the Sens were looking for a POHO while Doiron was the GM under Melnyk's tenure, with a very widely publicized search in 2019.Ok to the point I am making and I'll add a few others because a few guys have chimed in
@Micklebot
@Mingus Dew
Ultimately owners have final say. I think we can all agree on that. Many times we've heard some GM say "I want to thank my owner for approving this contract" kind of statement and that to me makes sense. In the economics of the NHL, if you sign someone to a 70M contract, you're signing away someone else's money so I'm quite certain that all owners get involved at certain points. 15M contracts? Probably not. But if any position, be it GM or POHO has to go to ownership, then they don't have the final say..
But, GM versus POHO versus VP of hockey ops. They're just titles. Ultimately it's more an issue of which position deals directly with ownership. In Ottawa's current situation that title is GM. In Toronto it was Shanahan who I think is called POHO? And ultimately that's what Dubas wanted. He and Dorion had the same titles but it seems Dorion had more authority
In Dorion's case, if Andlauer comes along and inserts a position between him and Dorion....which is probably a good thing...in the non hockey universe that's generally constructive dismissal. Dorion would have less authority but the same title/salary and that's generally a problem.
Ok to the point I am making and I'll add a few others because a few guys have chimed in
@Micklebot
@Mingus Dew
Ultimately owners have final say. I think we can all agree on that. Many times we've heard some GM say "I want to thank my owner for approving this contract" kind of statement and that to me makes sense. In the economics of the NHL, if you sign someone to a 70M contract, you're signing away someone else's money so I'm quite certain that all owners get involved at certain points. 15M contracts? Probably not. But if any position, be it GM or POHO has to go to ownership, then they don't have the final say..
But, GM versus POHO versus VP of hockey ops. They're just titles. Ultimately it's more an issue of which position deals directly with ownership. In Ottawa's current situation that title is GM. In Toronto it was Shanahan who I think is called POHO? And ultimately that's what Dubas wanted. He and Dorion had the same titles but it seems Dorion had more authority
In Dorion's case, if Andlauer comes along and inserts a position between him and Dorion....which is probably a good thing...in the non hockey universe that's generally constructive dismissal. Dorion would have less authority but the same title/salary and that's generally a problem.
I’m starting to think Dorion and Bowness both keep their jobs with Andlauer bringing in a POHO and maybe a Sr Advisor.
In this scenario Dorion stays as GM but he would not have the final say in Hockey Ops decisions, he would in reality be more of an AGM, he’s already paid like an AGM.
Disagree, because we didn’t have that position recently, most teams do have that position , and now Sens will, now that EM isn’t there anymore.Ok to the point I am making and I'll add a few others because a few guys have chimed in
@Micklebot
@Mingus Dew
Ultimately owners have final say. I think we can all agree on that. Many times we've heard some GM say "I want to thank my owner for approving this contract" kind of statement and that to me makes sense. In the economics of the NHL, if you sign someone to a 70M contract, you're signing away someone else's money so I'm quite certain that all owners get involved at certain points. 15M contracts? Probably not. But if any position, be it GM or POHO has to go to ownership, then they don't have the final say..
But, GM versus POHO versus VP of hockey ops. They're just titles. Ultimately it's more an issue of which position deals directly with ownership. In Ottawa's current situation that title is GM. In Toronto it was Shanahan who I think is called POHO? And ultimately that's what Dubas wanted. He and Dorion had the same titles but it seems Dorion had more authority
In Dorion's case, if Andlauer comes along and inserts a position between him and Dorion....which is probably a good thing...in the non hockey universe that's generally constructive dismissal. Dorion would have less authority but the same title/salary and that's generally a problem.
It's worth noting that Bryan Murray was made the POHO (second title) when he was extended as GM for 4 years back in 2014. 5 months after getting that extension he was diagnosed with Stage 4 colon cancer.Disagree, because we didn’t have that position recently, most teams do have that position , and now Sens will, now that EM isn’t there anymore.
Not having that position when team was cheap, doesn’t mean now changing to having it, is like a dismissal. Just means filling in a position that was vacant for a while.
Going to add some context without getting myself in trouble.
I had heard before Canada Day that there was something going on between Trent and PD.
I mentioned that he was not allowed in the “War Room” on trade deadline day obviously he was around for the draft.
Keep in mind, hypothetically if there was any sort of investigation as to what was going on with Troy Mann, this might have had to do with some of the confusion regarding what Trent had access to and when.
I hadn’t personally heard about Mann being banned from the building, etc, but it’s entirely possible they met internally at some point and Trent was allowed his access again etc.
Unless it affects your personal or immediate family's livelihood, sure.It was in an article from February that there were issues going on. Trent and Troy are brothers. It was not going to end well no matter. You always side with family.