Does it seem that?
DeBrincat provided a list. Dorion has talked trade. Dorion has said he's got to the point of allowing teams to talk to DeBrincat and alluded to those talks falling apart over term.
It seems to me that the teams he is interested in aren't interested in him with term. Or his list is a sham.
Im coming at it from a biased view without a doubt, I’ve looked at the list as a sham ever since it was announced, knew it would have a near impossible success rate with teams actually looking for him and actually able to fit/want him. Turns out that’s how it played out. Somehow I was told I was freaking out and going off the deep-end because I said that DBC wasn’t going to be providing a list that benefited the Sens by including teams that realistically could get him, rather than the Vegas’, Florida’s of the league.
“Here are 5 teams I may sign with if you’re asking for a list. It’s not very realistic, and I’m really not really in a rush to sign, but knock your boots, if the right deal is there I will sign”
It should be no surprise that teams like the Isles, etc. aren’t going to be enticing to DBC, and it shouldn’t be put out in the media that DBC is holding up trades because he isn’t signing and his contract terms aren’t realistic. He’s under zero obligation to sign, other than the Sens selfishly (for good reason) wanting him to for their leverage. I have zero problem with the Sens trying to get him signed, but it doesn’t seem to be working, and it’s not DBC’s fault.
Garrioch saying that the team specifically asked for the list, when he has no trade protection whatsoever, sealed it for me, in my opinion. The team knows an unsigned DBC isn’t an appealing asset at 8 million for 1 year, it may literally be very tough to move. They’re hoping to get a deal signed before the trade. The list provided really bad 1 team with a legit possibility to make it work, IF they wanted, which they never.