We've also had someone else since his arrival that has prevented the Fisets, Cloutiers, and Cechmaneks.
Yes, a handful of back-ups have come in over the years and performed well when Quick's gone down. But Ranford's not some miracle medicine man that reanimates dead goalies into reliable starters. Where's Ben Scrivens? Ersberg? Labarbera? Enroth? Zatkoff? Martin Jones is a starter. Bernier, the former first round pick, has bounced around the league as a starter and back-up. Keumper's a back-up in Arizona and Budaj's the new Reign mascot. That's not really a very impressive "where are they now" list for 12 years worth of goalies. A backup playing well when they get the rare opportunity to be the #1 isn't an odd thing, these guys are athletes and competitors playing a unique position. They can step up, the team can rally behind them, but if you take away the "here's my chance" and the team mentality "just got to squeeze out whatever extra we can until Quick's back" are the results going to be the same?
Quick gets hurt. If he gets hurt long enough his salary is irrelevant. Cycling through back-ups while he's hurt has worked out alright for us. When he's healthy he's still one of the best in the game at a cap hit that looks better and better every year. I'm floored that people think trading him would be a good idea.