GDT: GM#4 LA Kings vs Montreal Canadiens @4:30pm 10/11/18

[BigKing]

Pretty trash. Steven should challenge.

 

[Sol]

Let's go boys.

 

[123slam]

HAHAHHAHAHA WOWWWWWW

 

[fsanford]

Are you f***ing kidding the whistle blew

 

[GoldenBearHockey]

Dumbfounding

 

[kingsholygrail]

Challenge time. lol

 

[johnjm22]

The play was blown dead.

I don't recall ever seeing a blown dead play get called a goal after a review.

 

[KINGS17]

How many times have we seen the Kings be up 2 or 3 goals in the 3rd period in Montreal, then the officiating takes over.

 

[123slam]

Good job Stevens. Overturn that shit.

 

[Little Psycho]

Damn the refs really helping out the Habs

 

[Sol]

Wait how is it possible they can call that a goal with a whistle being blown?

 

[King'sPawn]

They seriously spent an entire commercial break determining the puck crossed the line in a continuous motion?

The **** is that?

 

[Herby]

This is just so senseless. Just do it in all one review.

And no Fox, he didn't waive it off for interference, he called it for a high stick, which the official review correctly showed it wasn't. But everything should be looked at in one replay.

 

[Sol]

LMFAO

 

[chesed]

Hahah no goal! Goal!

Wait, no goal.

 

[GoldenBearHockey]

Lmao I'm dying here

 

[Little Psycho]

I'm dead!!!! Yes! Suck on that!

 

[Ziggy Stardust]

Thank God sanity prevails. f*** off Montreal.

 

[kingsholygrail]

lel How much time did that suck up?

 

[Cook24]

The play was blown dead, how was a goal even in consideration...

 

[KingTrouty]

Habs fans just went through a roller coaster of emotions Lol

 

[LAKings88]

Stupid procedure.

 

[Martyros]

so after the ref motioned that there was goalie contact.....they call it a goal and THEN they WAIT for stevens to ask for ANOTHER review to overturn the goalie based off of what they originally claimed was goalie interference.

 

[Legionnaire]

Double challenge. LOL

 

[justonetime]

This happen against the Kings last year was it? Finally some justice.

Also, main board thread should be good.

 

[Little Psycho]

so after the ref motioned that there was goalie contact.....they call it a goal and THEN they WAIT for stevens to ask for ANOTHER review to overturn the goalie based off of what they originally claimed was goalie interference.

It's so stupid. Confusion should be the motto for the league.

 

[123slam]

That's gotta get changed. That's a waste of a coach's challenge. How do you not just determine that shit in one review?