*Bob Richards*
Guest
Dolan on Francessa today "Glen Sather is the best in the business"![]()
If that's the case then I wonder what that makes guys like Bowman and Chiarelli.
Dolan on Francessa today "Glen Sather is the best in the business"![]()
If that's the case then I wonder what that makes guys like Bowman and Chiarelli.
Well if Sather does retire at some point (I'll believe it when I see it) the new GM will have a built in 'Get out of Jail Free' card. Down the road people will always be able to point to the 2013, 2014 and 2015 entry drafts, where we had a grand total of one first round and one second round draft pick in three years, as to why the new GM's hands were tied when trying to rebuild the team.
And what we have to show for those draft picks is Rich Nash and his $7.8 million cap hit through 2017-18, a small number of games from Ryan Clowe, and this year and next year of Marty St Louis.
Sather had to sacrifice the future not as the last piece(s) to a Stanley Cup champion, but to fortify teams so they can fight for the last few playoffs spot every year. And maybe not even make the playoffs this year. Pathetic.
Thanks Glen. Leave. Now.
Dolan on Francessa today "Glen Sather is the best in the business"![]()
Dolan doesn't seem to care that he's the biggest loser in NY sports history. Or, maybe his definition of winning isn't ours? But, my how those ticket prices have risen.
Is that really the standard that for a player that you gave up half your core and picks for, should be held to? That a $7.8 player was two points behind Derek Stepan? For what he is paid and what was given up for him, he should be one of the very best in the league.Nash was two points behind Step for leading scorer last year, and this year he's leading the team in goals.
What have his goal totals for the Rangers been? And yes, if all he does is score 30 goals, then at $7.8 he is grossly overpaid.I really don't think that 7.8 million is going to be a huge hit for a 30 goal scorer as soon as even next year.
Sorry, but St. Louis does not get the benefit of a fittin gin period. At his price, and considering that lots of folks here consider him to be one of the very best in the league, he needs to make an instant impact. How has he benefitted this team so far?St. Louis has played a handful of games this season, and still has 82 games next season that you've already written off.
Tell me about Nash's contributions. What have they been? And also tell me how MSL has mattered so far. The only way that the MSL trade is a winner is if they win the Cup.All this "sacrifice the future" talk is hyperbole, as is writing off Nash's contributions, and writing off the huge bulk of St. Louis' contributions that haven't even happened yet.
Since he took over, how would you describe his personnel moves? What has been the typical result for the team on average during Sather's tenure?but this constant bemoaning of the team's situation by assuming that every future worst case scenario is going to come true is just nonsense.
The team made money before Dolan. The team made money before Sather.Which at the end of the day, ironically enough, makes him the winner doesn't it? If this is a business, and the goal is to make money, then no doubt Sather and Dolan might actually be the best in the business.
Again, you're jumping two years ahead of time and complaining about things that haven't even happened yet
All this "sacrifice the future" talk is hyperbole, as is writing off Nash's contributions, and writing off the huge bulk of St. Louis' contributions that haven't even happened yet.
Which at the end of the day, ironically enough, makes him the winner doesn't it? If this is a business, and the goal is to make money, then no doubt Sather and Dolan might actually be the best in the business.
The only way that the MSL trade is a winner is if they win the Cup.
Which at the end of the day, ironically enough, makes him the winner doesn't it? If this is a business, and the goal is to make money, then no doubt Sather and Dolan might actually be the best in the business.
The Garden made money when it was Gulf & Western,Paramount,Viacom,ITT/Cablevision and then just CVC.
'Has it been over 10 years already?" - Jim Dolan regarding Slats as Ranger GM
"Some of the trades he's made, wonder how he got the other GM to agree?" - Dolan on Sathers 'genius'
"We're in a playoff spot but I'm worried" - Jimmy
"We have a good team" - Jimmy
Same old same old song and dance.......
I almost drove off the highway into the Meadowlands when he said that. That one sentence sums up everything thats wrong with this franchise.
LaGreca knows 10X more about the franchise then its owner. Here we all are, the diehard fans obsessing over the tenure of our incompetent GM on a daily basis for years and the owner that hired him doesnt even know how long he's been with the club, and doesnt really know why he hired him to begin with.
****ing embarrassment.
And then the one time Dolan is on the airwaves talking about the Rangers, Kay cuts the interview short. So frustrating.
It pissed me off so much I called in to that show, called a sports radio show for the first time ever.
I compared Phil Jackson coming to the Knicks like Slats to the Rangers - lazy same old line of thought - throw money at the biggest name available. Now PJ is not the same as when we brought in a guy who failed for a good decade, but the mentality is the same, no outside the box thinking.
REAL genius is bringing in 'the next' Slats, 'the next' PJ, thats where the outside the box thinking has to come. IMO, HUNGRY guys make more of a dent in NY than the established names. Neil Smith was an up and comer and thirsty to prove his worth.
It pissed me off so much I called in to that show, called a sports radio show for the first time ever.
I compared Phil Jackson coming to the Knicks like Slats to the Rangers - lazy same old line of thought - throw money at the biggest name available. Now PJ is not the same as when we brought in a guy who failed for a good decade, but the mentality is the same, no outside the box thinking.
REAL genius is bringing in 'the next' Slats, 'the next' PJ, thats where the outside the box thinking has to come. IMO, HUNGRY guys make more of a dent in NY than the established names. Neil Smith was an up and comer and thirsty to prove his worth.
Not sure what you are getting at here.Compare 1974-1994 to 1994-2014. How did the teams do on the ice? How did the front office approach team building?
Everything increased. Off course that also has to do with inflationary increasesCompare ticket price increases, annual revenue, the value of the New York Rangers.
Rangers made revenues beforeDolan has the benefit of a changing NYC and he's maximizing revenue, in the time honored way. Big names attract big ticket price increases.
All of the many successes of the team make it seem like only yesterday they were a laughingstock. And just look at them nowI almost drove off the highway into the Meadowlands when he said that. That one sentence sums up everything thats wrong with this franchise.
Honestly I thought hiring Phil Jackson was a good move for the Knicks.
But it really is the same old song and dance. Find the biggest name, throw money, results? Same old BS that has Dolan's teams in oblivion.
I don't know though, Phil Jackson is about 2 tiers above Sather. He's one of the greatest basketball minds in history.
Yeah Slats wasn't too far from this kind of praise in 2000.
And I agree, PJ is a GREAT bball mind, but once that mind gets to NY, all sorts of **** goes wrong. And all I'm hearing is now that he's here the FA's will line up to play in NY. We'll see.....