But if you do not count the October games, and not the losses against Boston, Philly and now San Jose, and if you only take out a few pesky November games, well then you have as good a team as any in the NHL. A GREAT season. Draft picks are a waste anyway.A few points from making or not making the playoffs shouldn't be the deciding factor.
It's not true. He has placed the team in a win-now mode. All of his moves, cap space, prospects, draft picks be dammed, will be to WIN NOW. That means next year. Once that fails, and he has further destroyed the organization, only then will he retire. And leave a barren farm system and a team that will be in salary cap hell to his successor to clean up.If this was true, someone should have locked him in a closet at the trade deadline.
It's not true. He has placed the team in a win-now mode. All of his moves, cap space, prospects, draft picks be dammed, will be to WIN NOW. That means next year. Once that fails, and he has further destroyed the organization, only then will he retire. And leave a barren farm system and a team that will be in salary cap hell to his successor to clean up.
Lion or a Mouse.
If I had the Rangers payroll, I would win the Cup ever year.
And what was that line about success and winning Stanley Cups that he made, post Torts firing?
I don't buy that he's hanging them up after this season, because if he was, I seriously doubt the Rangers management would have let him OK a move like the MSL deal.
Like you said, I think this team is in "win now, cost be damned" mode. I'd expect at least one or two more years of Sather running the show and the team being loaded up with aging vets to try and make a run or two. Then Gorton takes over and rebuilds the team how he wants it. I have to think that he's been promised this job after Sather retires. Otherwise, I can't imagine why he's still around.
You are not wrong, but if he is going to retire, it may be after next season and the St. Louis contract is done and he has made up with Yzerman and went back to retire in Tampa.I don't buy that he's hanging them up after this season, because if he was, I seriously doubt the Rangers management would have let him OK a move like the MSL deal.
Like you said, I think this team is in "win now, cost be damned" mode. I'd expect at least one or two more years of Sather running the show and the team being loaded up with aging vets to try and make a run or two. Then Gorton takes over and rebuilds the team how he wants it. I have to think that he's been promised this job after Sather retires. Otherwise, I can't imagine why he's still around.
If the Rangers go outside the organization for the next GM, get ready for Brian Burke as your next Rangers GM.
Prototypical Dolan pick. Typical lazy, good 'ol boys club choice.
Sather IS Rangers management. Dolan was too busy trying to hire Phil Jackson. Who was going to stop Sather from making the MSL trade? Gorton should leave if the plan is to load up and not worry about anything. He will have an impossible job putting this thing back together. Dolan will fire him before he has a chance to build it back up if that philosophy even exists in Rangersland.
Sather's list of greatest accomplishments as Rangers GM:
1.) Trading for Ryan McDonagh.
2.) Retiring.
I guess in my mind "letting him" make that deal means we'd see some people leave the organization because of philosophical differences. However, I'm starting to wonder if Gorton isn't more closely tied to Sather than we all might think. I know there was a bit of a divide about buying out Richards, but who knows what side of the fence he was really on?
All we know it the Rangers waited until the last minute to not amnesty Richards because there was a difference of opinion in management. How many members make up management? Sather. Gorton. Schoenfeld. The #3 held up the Richards decision? Dolan allows Sather to make his own moves. Gorton can't trust any verbal promise from Sather or Dolan. Unless Gorton has it in written in his contract,he can't be sure that the job will be his. If its written into the contract,there would probably be some timetable in that contract. Gorton likes the big boys. Look at this roster. Where are the big boys? MSL has Sather written all over him. He likes those players. The big time goal scorer. Bure. Jagr. Naslund. Gaborik. Nash. As Brooks pointed out today,nothing has changed with the addition of Nash. Keep spinning their wheels. Splashy move. No real substance.
Yeah, how involved was he in the Kotalik, Brashear, Boogaard, McIlrath, Lisin etc. moves?Gorton may like bigger players, but he also signed Marc Savard to a FA deal. He also signed Chara. I appreciate his track record, but we can't be sure he isn't drinking from the same fountain as Sather. Supposedly Gorton handled the Gaborik trade, so what exactly is going on behind the scenes? Why does he handle certain moves but not others? Why is he hanging around if Sather is letting him run day-to-day ops, but is undoing his work with idiotic moves? None of this makes any sense on any level.
Yeah, how involved was he in the Kotalik, Brashear, Boogaard, McIlrath, Lisin etc. moves?
Yeah, and Don Maloney before him.It's the HFNYR way. Bad moves - Sather. Good moves - Gorton.
It's just how it's been since Jeff was added to the mix. Fact is, unless otherwise stated, we'll never know how involved Gorton is with personnel moves. He should be held just as accountable as Sather as a member of the FO.
Well, maybe a little less than Sather since the buck stops with Glen. But fact is, Gorton is already in there, and here the Rangers are...
It's the HFNYR way. Bad moves - Sather. Good moves - Gorton.
It's just how it's been since Jeff was added to the mix. Fact is, unless otherwise stated, we'll never know how involved Gorton is with personnel moves. He should be held just as accountable as Sather as a member of the FO.
Well, maybe a little less than Sather since the buck stops with Glen. But fact is, Gorton is already in there, and here the Rangers are...