IDK, I feel like he has like 2/3rds of a forward corps. A good top six, and then a third line that, depending on who is there on a given night, is made up of chronically underperforming guys, guys that really belong on a fourth line, and then guys that shouldn't even be in the NHL. Which then makes it tough when the top six struggles, because whoever you put there is inevitably not remotely qualified to be there.
IIRC the Panarin-Strome-Kakko line had good 5v5 numbers before Kakko got hurt, and it feels like the Kreider-Zibanejad-Lafreniere line is usually pretty solid. The third and fourth lines would probably be better served icing the puck every time rather than trying to play. If they had 3 guys the caliber of Goodrow, I think the team as a whole would look quite a bit better.
Also, while I like Barron, I don't think having him in the lineup would make much of a difference at this point. He's fine when he's out there but he's not a difference-maker. Having McKegg in the lineup is dumb but literally every coach out there has random players that they have inexplicable faith in. I think most of the things Gallant gets killed for, you can see in other coaches.
IIRC the Panarin-Strome-Kakko line had good 5v5 numbers before Kakko got hurt, and it feels like the Kreider-Zibanejad-Lafreniere line is usually pretty solid. The third and fourth lines would probably be better served icing the puck every time rather than trying to play. If they had 3 guys the caliber of Goodrow, I think the team as a whole would look quite a bit better.
Also, while I like Barron, I don't think having him in the lineup would make much of a difference at this point. He's fine when he's out there but he's not a difference-maker. Having McKegg in the lineup is dumb but literally every coach out there has random players that they have inexplicable faith in. I think most of the things Gallant gets killed for, you can see in other coaches.