redcard
System Poster
- Mar 12, 2007
- 7,272
- 5,836
Well to be fair, if you looking at the costs involved to compare, you would need to factor in the cost of the other side -- Govt stimulus money, lost businesses, lost jobs, less investment, lost tax revenues, additional government business/individual aid, bad/insufficient/lost kid & young adult education, etc. It's almost mind numbing thinking of the ripple effects long-term (each side quite honestly).
I'm not disagreeing with your point -- just that there's more to it than the initial death or health care. Heck, what will the current (or even future changes) environment have long-term on health care employment and people going into that field? Again, it hurts your brain just thinking of the potentials one way or another. That's what alcohol is for i guess lol.
But if you did let things go somewhat non-vaccination/mask wise, you would likely end up seeing (for better or worse) a MUCH better presence of CV treatment and testing. IMHO, there's been a bizarre and curiously egregious lack of effort put in this aspect of things. It's like all the eggs went to the Vaccine and ignored treatment/testing. There is no reason we should be at a point where the only good test is a horrible nose swab that takes a medical person to do and results 24-72 hours later. That makes no sense. The lack of a treatment is also a shame -- resulting in the crazy/wacky, unproven treatments that have been pushed over the course of the past 15 months.
I don't really see those as counter points. Prior to vaccine availability you have an argument about the detrimental economic/education/mental health effects that you mentioned of a lockdown/shutdown/distance learning etc. But the vaccine itself is an alternative to those measures, reducing the need for a lockdown, reducing those costs in addition to the health care costs that Fishhead mentioned. All of that just points to an increased importance in vaccination.