Olympics: GDT 13 feb Finland vs Sweden

  • Xenforo Cloud will be upgrading us to version 2.3.5 on March 3rd at 12 AM GMT. This version has increased stability and fixes several bugs. We expect downtime for the duration of the update. The admin team will continue to work on existing issues, templates and upgrade all necessary available addons to minimize impact of this new version. Click Here for Updates
AB13 gives me the impression of being the most biased swede in here, together with that fool who insists writing that Sweden has their F-team. Department: Always an excuse for every loss and living in denial.
God forbid if little brother would actually have a better forward group. Because we actually do.
First of all, do you remember 2019? When you had quite the players. How did that go?
What about juniors these last decades? How many gold medals? What have you guys won lately?

Barkov over any Swedish center, check. I would choose Aho before Bäckström and Zibanejad too, even if it's closer it's not that difficult. What about your third center and fourth center? Better than Hintz, Lundell, Granlund etc. We even have Kotkaniemi and Luostarinen behind them. Like please, you are just being blind here.
Let me just say I have a feeling that Lundell would be close in numbers to Bäckström if he got that PP time and the chance to play with Ovie. The guy is already a great two-way center but he has shown how good he can be offensively. He completely dominated at the WJC´s, just like Heinola.
The thing here is as K.K. has mentioned, you need star power in front but going down the lines it's just as important with chemistry and roles. Kapanen could fill such role just as good as Bratt, Olofsson etc. There numbers become secondary when they have to take other roles than top6 or top9. One example of this is Markus Granlund. He's capable of being in a roster if he's a top 6 player in the team. There will always be better wingers for the lower lines in my opinion. Things aren't as "Easy" as you seem to believe.
I would even choose Teräväinen before Forsberg. Ever since 2014 when he won the WJC gold he's shown me he's capable of winning trophies and being a factor, more than Forsberg. I don't even give a rats ass about stats regarding this. He's won titles and contributed. That's that. Those juniors from 2014 and on are now grown up and it's pretty clear Finland do have some winners.
Rantanen is clearly better than any Swedish winger.
Then we have that thing called chemistry. Give a player like Laine a center like Aho or Barkov and I´m sure he'll be another player. He's played with Little and Roslovic these last years...
Kakko shares some history with Lundell and they have worked well together. Kakko is another one who performes in the Leijonat jersey, at both junior level but at the 2019 WC´s as well.
As mentioned before, you only need 12-14 great-good forwards to win. Who cares if you have 25 top9 forwards with Garpen as a coach? What will you achieve with that?

Goalies: Saros, Lankinen, Kähkönen, Husso and Luukkonen over the Swedish ones? Yes please. Without hesitating.

The only thing at this very moment speaking in favor of Sweden is your defenders but it doesn't matter because the overall Finnish team would be stronger. Both in organization but also when it comes to different styles of players who could match together. That's the thing with Jalonen, he builds a good base and as K.K. has mentioned we have "Meidän peli". That means a good defense will always be one of the teams top priorities.
Like what makes you believe you would have a better chance of winning when you already had a lot of NHL players 2019 and still lost? Imagine when Jalonen gets his hands on Barkov, Aho, Lundell, Hintz, Granlund down the middle? Come on and stop lying to yourself. It's tragicomical to say the least.

It's close among the top five but I have Canada as the clear favorites followed by Finland and the US and perhaps Russia, with Sweden being really, really close at fifth. Well, only my opinion. Russia have a lot better goalies than Sweden and a stronger top6 as well. If they would have a good organization I´m sure they would beat Sweden. Good netminding with Kaprizov, Panarin, Kuznetsov, Ovechkin, Malkin, Svechnikov and probably Tarasenko before Swedish top6? Yes.
I mean when speaking of depth Canada and the US are superior no matter what, next topic? Star power. I feel like both Canada, the US, Russia and Finland nowadays have more to offer than Sweden.

There was a difference when we only hade a couple of guys like Selänne and Koivu etc. The thing you are missing here is that you are not on the same level as before and that we are actually better than before. It still was close back then but you had guys like a prime Forsberg, Sundin, Alfredsson and a good Näslund, Zetterberg and a lot more top6 depth than you have now. Lundqvist when he was good as well. Those times are behind you right now. Even if you have great talents such as Raymond and others coming up.
But hey, I have a feeling you believe Sweden have the best roster after Canada by your earlier sentences and that makes me believe that you are delusional at this point.
 
Last edited:
Qualification
Canada vs China (again)
Czech vs Swiss (again...)
Denmark vs Latvia (Slovenia 2014 2.0)
Slovakia vs Germany

QF
USA vs Slovakia/Germany
Finland vs Czech/Swiss
Russia vs Denmark/Latvia
Sweden vs Canada

Darn. In this tournament I would have preferred Canada before the Czechs. They can upset any team in this tournament.
 
AB13 gives me the impression of being the most biased swede in here, together with that fool who insists writing that Sweden has their F-team. Department: Always an excuse for every loss and living in denial.
God forbid if little brother would actually have a better forward group. Because we actually do.
First of all, do you remember 2019? When you hade quite the players. How did that go?
What about juniors these last decades? How many gold medals? What have you guys won lately?

Barkov over any Swedish center, check. I would choose Aho before Bäckström and Zibanejad too, even if it's closer it's not that difficult. What about your third center and fourth center? Better than Hintz, Lundell, Granlund etc. We even have Kotkaniemi and Luostarinen behind them. Like please, you are just being blind here.
Let me just say I have a feeling that Lundell would be close in numbers to Bäckström if he got that PP time and the chance to play with Ovie. The guy is already a great two-way center but he has shown how good he can be offensively. He completely dominated at the WJC´s, just like Heinola.
The thing here is as K.K. has mentioned, you need star power in front but going down the lines it's just as important with chemistry and roles. Kapanen could fill such role just as good as Bratt, Olofsson etc. There numbers become secondary when they have to take other roles than top6 or top9. One example of this is Markus Granlund. He's capable of being in a roster if he's a top 6 player in the team. There will always be better wingers for the lower lines in my opinion. Things aren't as "Easy" as you seem to believe.
I would even choose Teräväinen before Forsberg. Ever since 2014 when he won the WJC gold he's shown me he's capable of winning trophies and being a factor, more than Forsberg. I don't even give a rats ass about stats regarding this. He's won titles and contributed. That's that. Those juniors from 2014 and on are now grown up and it's pretty clear Finland do have some winners.
Rantanen is clearly better than any Swedish winger.
Then we have that thing called chemistry. Give a player like Laine a center like Aho or Barkov and I´m sure he'll be another player. He's played with Little and Roslovic these last years...
Kakko shares some history with Lundell and they have worked well together. Kakko is another one who performes in the Leijonat jersey, at both junior level but at the 2019 WC´s as well.
As mentioned before, you only need 12-14 great-good forwards to win. Who cares if you have 25 top9 forwards with Garpen as a coach? What will you achieve with that?

Goalies: Saros, Lankinen, Kähkönen, Husso and Luukkonen over the Swedish ones? Yes please. Without hesitating.

The only thing at this very moment speaking in favor of Sweden is your defenders but it doesn't matter because the overall Finnish team would be stronger. Both in organization but also when it comes to different styles of players who could match together. That's the thing with Jalonen, he builds a good base and as K.K. has mentioned we have "Meidän peli". That means a good defense will always be one of the teams top priorities.
Like what makes you believe you would have a better chance of winning when you already had a lot of NHL players 2019 and still lost? Imagine when Jalonen gets his hands on Barkov, Aho, Lundell, Hintz, Granlund down the middle? Come on and stop lying to yourself. It's tragicomical to say the least.

It's close among the top five but I have Canada as the clear favorites followed by Finland and the US and perhaps Russia, with Sweden being really, really close at fifth. Well, only my opinion. Russia have a lot better goalies than Sweden and a stronger top6 as well. If they would have a good organization I´m sure they would beat Sweden. Good netminding with Karpizov, Panarin, Kuznetsov, Ovechkin, Malkin, Svechnikov and probably Tarasenko before Swedish top6? Yes.
I mean when speaking of depth Canada and the US are superior no matter what, next topic? Star power. I feel like both Canada, the US, Russia and Finland nowadays have more to offer than Sweden.

There was a difference when we only hade a couple of guys like Selänne and Koivu etc. The thing you are missing here is that you are not on the same level as before and that we are actually better than before. It still was close back then but you had guys like a prime Forsberg, Sundin, Alfredsson and a good Näslund, Zetterberg and a lot more top6 depth than you have now. Lundqvist when he was good as well. Those times are behind you right now. Even if you have great talents such as Raymond and others coming up.
But hey, I have a feeling you believe Sweden have the best roster after Canada by your earlier sentences and that makes me believe that you are delusional at this point.
I believe Sweden are third.
Canada
USA
Sweden
Russia
Finland
Czechs
 
  • Like
Reactions: Elias40
Landeskog -Bäckström - Nylander
Pettersson - Zibanejad - Nylander
Bratt - Lindholm -Raymond
Burakovsky -Eriksson Ek - Kempe

The difference in bottom 6 between Sweden and Finland is significant and more than makes up for what you perceive to be a difference in superstars. All players on that team are high end scorers. Could add Olofsson, Arvidsson, Rakell, or someone else, if you prefer. That bottom 6 is definately not much worse than the USA bottom 6 today, and on par with the 2010 and 2014 teams we talked about.

Bratt is not even better than Finnish alternatives for top-9 or bottom-6. I wouldn't have him in a top12 roster for Finland buddy. Another question for your simple mind? How good do you believe Burakovsky would be in a fourth line under Garpenlöv? Kempe is another one I feel is a bit overrated. Not a winner in my book. Your forward group is not as good as the Finnish and still you insist on claiming you would have the stronger group of forwards. Scary.
 
Bratt is not even better than Finnish alternatives for top-9 or bottom-6. I wouldn't have him in a top12 roster for Finland buddy. Another question for your simple mind? How good do you believe Burakovsky would be in a fourth line under Garpenlöv? Kempe is another one I feel is a bit overrated. Not a winner in my book. Your forward group is not as good as the Finnish and still you insist on claiming you would have the stronger group of forwards. Scary.
PPG player Jesper Bratt is worse than Puljujärvi? Behave mate. All star Adrian Kempe and Burakovsky are way way better than your alternatives for that role. If you can’t see that there is no point in arguing with you.
 
I´m claiming I would prefer others before Bratt in a Jalonen team, yes. Puljujärvi has other assets to his game. Size combined with his skating etc. I believe we have others just as good as Bratt. Mikael Granlund or Hintz could be wingers in a third line as well. I would choose both of them before Bratt. Questions on that?

All Star Kempe? Are you kidding now? Just wow. Kempe som uträttade oerhört mycket mot finska D-laget 2019? Just ja. Good one gubben.
 
PPG player Jesper Bratt is worse than Puljujärvi? Behave mate. All star Adrian Kempe and Burakovsky are way way better than your alternatives for that role. If you can’t see that there is no point in arguing with you.


This is his naivete, because a few years ago the Laine-Aho-Puljujärvi attack was successful on the WJC. And so they still live in how good those players are, even though we have the year 2022 and only Aho confirms the quality for a long time. Laine should be much further today than he currently is and Puljujärvi even escaped to Finland because he could not get a place in the first team. So as he writes to you that you are naive and live in illusion, so he lives in the same illusion of Puljujärvi's quality.
 
  • Like
Reactions: AB13
This is his naivete, because a few years ago the Laine-Aho-Puljujärvi attack was successful on the WJC. And so they still live in how good those players are, even though we have the year 2022 and only Aho confirms the quality for a long time. Laine should be much further today than he currently is and Puljujärvi even escaped to Finland because he could not get a place in the first team. So as he writes to you that you are naive and live in illusion, so he lives in the same illusion of Puljujärvi's quality.

You are the one stucked in that. I do believe Puljujärvi has some strengths to his game that can translate well in a lower role for a Finnish national team, yes. But with that said, he's does not have a certain spot in a Finnish team. He's an option.
If you wanna bash Laine without considering his line mates these last years? I could do the same and say that Bäckström wouldn't be any better than a young Lundell if he had other linemates than Ovechkin. You are trying to be narrow-minded but it doesn't seem to work that well...
 
Last edited:
If only finns could understand how ridiculous they sound. There are four teams with way way better rosters. You basically have an AHL level defence core. Compare yourselves to the Czechs for now. They are your biggest competition.
 
If only finns could understand how ridiculous they sound. There are four teams with way way better rosters. You basically have an AHL level defence core. Compare yourselves to the Czechs for now. They are your biggest competition.

Lmao! You are pure comedy and so salty. Gå köp lite djungelvrål och salta chips lilla gubben. Thank you for the entertainment.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Jussi and Hasa92
Bratt is not even better than Finnish alternatives for top-9 or bottom-6. I wouldn't have him in a top12 roster for Finland buddy.

Ok, so I'll take these words of yours. Would you really ignore Bratt for Kapanen or Kakko? With what he produces this season in the NJD quality team? And I have the impression that Bratt often has other teammates, because the NJD coach often changes attacks but Bratt doesn't slow down. Wouldn't you really need anything Bratt has to offer?
 
Ok, so I'll take these words of yours. Would you really ignore Bratt for Kapanen or Kakko? With what he produces this season in the NJD quality team? And I have the impression that Bratt often has other teammates, because the NJD coach often changes attacks but Bratt doesn't slow down. Wouldn't you really need anything Bratt has to offer?

No, I dont´see Bratt being good enough for a top6 role in Finland. Can you understand that? When playing against the top teams like Canada, the US and Russia I would prefer other wingers for bottom6 before him. He's really good, no doubt. But not good enough for Finlands top6 and therefor I wouldn't choose him and I don't think Jalonen would.
Laine with Aho or Barkov centering is a better option than Bratt. Rantanen, really? Teräväinen before Bratt? Hell yeah.
Players who can offer a bit more strength like Pulju or Kakko before Bratt as lower line options? Why not. Kapanen with his speed and BP? Yeah, for a fourth line I would choose Kapanen before Bratt as well.
Or if you want to emphasize overall skill on the third line? Yeah, I would choose Hintz or Mikke Granlund over Bratt as well. Further questions?

Det är just det här jag menar, man måste verkligen bryta ner allt för att ni ska få ett hum om minsta lilla. Är jag er lärare? Do the math.

You guys are just trying to nitpick now so that your salty ass*s can feel a bit better. That's the impression you are giving me at least.
Imagine the irony, you guys had a lot of those NHL players 2019 and it seems that you've already forgotten that you couldn't beat a Finnish team without NHL players. Still, you insist on being salty and arrogant. Comical.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Hasa92
No, I dont´see Bratt being good enough for a top6 role in Finland. Can you understand that? When playing against the top teams like Canada, the US and Russia I would prefer other wingers for bottom6 before him. He's really good, no doubt. But not good enough for Finlands top6 and therefor I wouldn't choose him and I don't think Jalonen would.
Laine with Aho or Barkov centering is a better option than Bratt. Rantanen, really? Teräväinen before Bratt? Hell yeah.
Players who can offer a bit more strength like Pulju or Kakko before Bratt as lower line options? Why not. Kapanen with his speed and BP? Yeah, for a fourth line I would choose Kapanen before Bratt as well.
Or if you want to emphasize overall skill on the third line? Yeah, I would choose Hintz or Mikke Granlund over Bratt as well. Further questions?

Det är just det här jag menar, man måste verkligen bryta ner allt för att ni ska få ett hum om minsta lilla. Är jag er lärare? Do the math.

You guys are just trying to nitpick now so that your salty ass*s can feel a bit better. That's the impression you are giving me at least.
Imagine the irony, you guys had a lot of those NHL players 2019 and it seems that you've already forgotten that you couldn't beat a Finnish team without NHL players. Still, you insist on being salty and arrogant. Comical.


No, I dont´see Bratt being good enough for a top6 role in Finland. Can you understand that? When playing against the top teams like Canada, the US and Russia I would prefer other wingers for bottom6 before him. He's really good, no doubt. But not good enough for Finlands top6 and therefor I wouldn't choose him and I don't think Jalonen would.
Laine with Aho or Barkov centering is a better option than Bratt. Rantanen, really? Teräväinen before Bratt? Hell yeah.
Players who can offer a bit more strength like Pulju or Kakko before Bratt as lower line options? Why not. Kapanen with his speed and BP? Yeah, for a fourth line I would choose Kapanen before Bratt as well.
Or if you want to emphasize overall skill on the third line? Yeah, I would choose Hintz or Mikke Granlund over Bratt as well. Further questions?

Det är just det här jag menar, man måste verkligen bryta ner allt för att ni ska få ett hum om minsta lilla. Är jag er lärare? Do the math.

You guys are just trying to nitpick now so that your salty ass*s can feel a bit better. That's the impression you are giving me at least.
Imagine the irony, you guys had a lot of those NHL players 2019 and it seems that you've already forgotten that you couldn't beat a Finnish team without NHL players. Still, you insist on being salty and arrogant. Comical.

Well, I don't know, I recognized the quality of Rantanen, Barkov and Aha as something that the Swedes don't have, they just can't match that quality. I don't know why you're writing me something about 2019, I have nothing to do with it. And I still think that Bratt could play in the third Finnish attack, not in the second, Finland has better options there. Of course, Jalonen would use Aho + Teräväinen chemistry and would never put Bratt there. I recognize the Finnish quality, so don't come at me with some arrogance and similar crap.
 
Sweden has the better d-men for sure but I would definitely take Finnish forwards over the Swedish ones without even thinking yes even bottom six... Goalies nowadays are pretty close but I'd still give my countrymen the edge. Overall it's pretty even but when we start to consider things like coaching, chemistry etc. Finland should be everyone's choice here.

Infact I would only take Canada over Finland in every best on best tournament right now although on paper the roster isn't that good.

My on paper top 6 power rankings:

Canada
Russia
USA
--
Finland
Sweden
--
Czech

And the same with everything considered:

Canada
Finland
--
Russia
USA
--
Sweden
Czech

Not a scientific paper, just my personal gut feelings for what it's worth.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Svedu
Awesome game and so juicy comments in this thread. :popcorn:

It was a great victory, but AB's comments are so stupid it is almost unbelievable and getting boring. He doesn't give any credit to Finland for the win and think Sweden was the better team. Why are there so few Swedes that are usually nice and reasonable coming and taping his mouth?
 
It was a great victory, but AB's comments are so stupid it is almost unbelievable and getting boring. He doesn't give any credit to Finland for the win and think Sweden was the better team. Why are there so few Swedes that are usually nice and reasonable coming and taping his mouth?
I’m not discrediting Finland by thinking Sweden was the better team. I think Finland have a better Olympic roster this year. I have never ever discredited Finland. Think Sweden controlled the game, but that is not the same thing as not giving Finland credit. Is that unreasonable? Does that mind my mouth needs to be taped? Stop the disrespect.

All I am saying that can be interpreted as disrespectful to Finland is that they don’t have an NHL roster that is as good as the top 4 nations. But I think everyone who isn’t a homer knows that.
 
Sweden has the better d-men for sure but I would definitely take Finnish forwards over the Swedish ones without even thinking yes even bottom six... Goalies nowadays are pretty close but I'd still give my countrymen the edge. Overall it's pretty even but when we start to consider things like coaching, chemistry etc. Finland should be everyone's choice here.

Infact I would only take Canada over Finland in every best on best tournament right now although on paper the roster isn't that good.

My on paper top 6 power rankings:

Canada
Russia
USA
--
Finland
Sweden
--
Czech

And the same with everything considered:

Canada
Finland
--
Russia
USA
--
Sweden
Czech

Not a scientific paper, just my personal gut feelings for what it's worth.

You have Jalonen, Ahokas succeeded as WJC head coach and you simply have far better coaching than the Swedes. Isn't it also your opinion that you are better than Sweden because of that? In my eyes, Sweden is still a bit better, but thanks to strategy and coaching, Finland can take it. I would like to see your team at a tournament under Garpenlöv or Monten.
 
I’m not discrediting Finland by thinking Sweden was the better team. I think Finland have a better Olympic roster this year. I have never ever discredited Finland. Think Sweden controlled the game, but that is not the same thing as not giving Finland credit. Is that unreasonable? Does that mind my mouth needs to be taped? Stop the disrespect.

All I am saying that can be interpreted as disrespectful to Finland is that they don’t have an NHL roster that is as good as the top 4 nations. But I think everyone who isn’t a homer knows that.

Allright. I'm not going to start a new conversation about who has the better roster on best on best tournament. NHL-players are not around this year and we are all equally bitter about it. This is what it is now and we have to live with it. Lets focus on the way things are, not the way we all wished for. There's no point to argue which team would be the best if the NHL participated.
 
PPG player Jesper Bratt is worse than Puljujärvi? Behave mate. All star Adrian Kempe and Burakovsky are way way better than your alternatives for that role. If you can’t see that there is no point in arguing with you.
Dude.. I really don't want to mean no harm but are you actually serious? "All Star" Adrian Kempe, say that sentence once again, loud and clear. This All Star has never broke 40pts in his career and this season he's got 28 points. All Star game in 2022 is not a merit and we all know it. Kasperi Kapanen for example has scored with higher rate than this All Star and that should tell you something.
 
You have Jalonen, Ahokas succeeded as WJC head coach and you simply have far better coaching than the Swedes. Isn't it also your opinion that you are better than Sweden because of that? In my eyes, Sweden is still a bit better, but thanks to strategy and coaching, Finland can take it. I would like to see your team at a tournament under Garpenlöv or Monten.

Do you mean this tournament or best on best? On best on best I would agree Sweden could ice a better team overall. This Olympic team there's no question which team is better.
 
You have Jalonen, Ahokas succeeded as WJC head coach and you simply have far better coaching than the Swedes. Isn't it also your opinion that you are better than Sweden because of that? In my eyes, Sweden is still a bit better, but thanks to strategy and coaching, Finland can take it. I would like to see your team at a tournament under Garpenlöv or Monten.
No thanks, we already suffered with Marjamäki
 
  • Like
Reactions: Hasa92
You have Jalonen, Ahokas succeeded as WJC head coach and you simply have far better coaching than the Swedes. Isn't it also your opinion that you are better than Sweden because of that? In my eyes, Sweden is still a bit better, but thanks to strategy and coaching, Finland can take it. I would like to see your team at a tournament under Garpenlöv or Monten.
Yes, because of Jalonen mostly I believe that Finland is quite a bit better than Sweden at their best right now but there are other factors such as that Finland in general seems to be able to play much better than the roster indicates, this has often been a characteristic thing for team Finland.

On paper the Swedish and Finnish teams seem quite close to me even thought very different and with different strengths and weaknesses but I would still take the Finnish team even when only based on the rosters on paper, however I can also see why some would take Sweden over Finland here.

In 2016-2018 we had a bad head coach (for the national team) Lauri Marjamäki, We didn't get any medals with him and had some of the worst results in years.
 
Do you mean this tournament or best on best? On best on best I would agree Sweden could ice a better team overall. This Olympic team there's no question which team is better.

Your Olympic team for Beijing is definitely better than the Swedish team, of course I think best on best.
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad