I always enjoy reading oilerbear's posts
it is all based on
1. watching players;
2. Forming an opinion.
3. seeing if the GF and GA results
match the old school saw him good or saw him bad approach.
4. watching video of
system
and
players .
5. breaking down the mechanics of each.
Critical things are observed
this one in feb 06:
1. 75% of goals come from 10.5 of the games 30 shots.
those shots come from an area in front of the net I identified as the HSCA area.
latlely you see a lot of sportsnets graphics represent the area.
comes from Sports logix
they talk about the need to penetrate the area.
That 17% of the offensive zone is largely guarded by Dmen preventing HSCA shots.
and
Goalies trying to stop the shots that go in 8.5 to 30% of the time.
Cup winners always have top 10 HSCA save% goalies and 3+ top 60 HSCA D.
The variance in HSCA shots by D men can be 7- 14.0 but
top 10 is around 7.5 shots
and
bottom 10 is around 13.5 shots.
13.5 - 7.5 = 6 SHOT DIFFRENCE 6/13.5 = 44.44%
take a progression of HSCA Save% goalies and look at there GA facing 7.5; 10.5 and 13.5 shots.
#1 Price .889: (1.000 -.889) = .111 HSCA shots go in.
7.5 X .111 = .83 EVGA/60
10.5 X .111 = 1.17 EVGA /60
13.5 X .111 = 1.50 EVGA/60
the difference between the top GA by HSC shots face d is (1.5 - .83)/1.5; 44.7%
#2-3 Talbot; Griess .886
#4 Holtby .885
#5 Halak .882: (1.000 -.882) = .118 HSCA shots go in.
7.5 X .118 = .89 EVGA/60
10.5 X .118 = 1.24 EVGA /60
13.5 X .118 = 1.59 EVGA/60
Diffrence is (1.59-.89)/ 1.59 = 44.0%
#6 Jones.881
#7 Elliot .880
#8 Crawford .878
#9 Lundquist .877
#10-11 Bernier; Schnieder .874: (1.000 -.874) = .126 HSCA shots go in.
7.5 X .126 = .945 EVGA/60
10.5 X .126 = 1.32 EVGA /60
13.5 X .126 = 1.70 EVGA/60
difference is (1.70-.945)/1.70 = 44.4%
#12 Mrazek .873
#13-16 Quick; Fluery; Rask; Neuvirth .871
7.5 X .129 = .97 EVGA/60
10.5 X .129 = 1.355 EVGA /60
13.5 X .129 = 1.74 EVGA/60
difference is (1.74-.97)/1.74 = 44.3%
#17-19 Lack; Gibson; Varlamov .870
#20-21 Bishop; Miller .867
7.5 X .133 = 1.00 EVGA/60
10.5 X .133 = 1.40 EVGA /60
13.5 X .133 = 1.80 EVGA/60
difference is (1.80-1.00)/1.80 = 44.4%
#22 Lehtonen .866
#23 Khudobin .863
#24-28 F. Andersson; Scrivens; Mason .861
7.5 X .139 = 1.04 EVGA/60
10.5 X .139 = 1.46 EVGA /60
13.5 X .139 = 1.88 EVGA/60
difference is (1.88- 1.04)/1.88 = 44.7%
#29 Reimer .860
#30-34 Dubnyk; Pavalec; Hiller; Bobrovsky; Ranta .859
7.5 X .141 = 1.06EVGA/60
10.5 X .141 = 1.48 EVGA /60
13.5 X .141 = 1.90 EVGA/60
difference is (1.90- 1.06)/1.90 = 44.2%
what is obvious is that the even total goals is varies by 44.4% based on quality of Defensive Dmen.
the variance between top HSCA save % goalie and Bottom HSCA save% goalies
is
7.5 SHots:
price .83
Dubnyk..... 1.06
(1.06 -.83)/1.06 = 21.7%
10.5 shots
price 1.17
Dub.... 1.48
(1.48 - 1.17)/1.48 = 20.9%
13.5 shots
price 1.50
dub.... 1.90
(1.9 - 1.50)/1.90 = 21.1%
Lik most sports players perform around league average.
at both end sof the spectrum D and Goalies are difrence makers
golaies can have a maxinum affect of 21-22%
Dmen can have a maximum affect of 44-45%
so haveingthe top end of HSCA goalies and a Number of top 60 HSCA dgets ateam close to the conference finals.
They still need a coach that runs a HSCA system and Even production depth
1.Tmac a HSCA sys coach was hired.
Klefbom and Davidson continued in there HSC Ad development.
Davidson top 30 HSCA; EVGA; PKGA
Klefbom from top 90 HSCA D to top 60
2. Mact arranged the trade for Talbot trade deadline 05
sather oferred it to PC cause Mact was still there.
Talbot #2 HSCA save% goalie .886
3. PC traded hall for
Larsson
Top 10 HSCA d
#1 EVGA D
#12 PKGA D
Larsson top 10
What pisses me off as a oiler fan.
Toronto trades for one of the worst HSCA goalies
Andersson .862
and
then trades a top 10 HSCA save% goalie
bernier .874
to Anaheim
who have 3 top 25 HSCA D
Manson #6 HSCA D; #20 EVGA D
the switch to 40gm bernier majes him #5 EVGA D
Lindholm #8 HSCA D; #23 EVGA D
the switch to 40gm bernier makes him #7 EVGA D
Vatanen #23 HSCA D; #60 EVGA D
the switch to 40gm bernier makes him #32 EVGA D
Makes the pacific even tougher!