Yeah, it's clear it had to be done, i just wish it was a bit clearer why. In the end, the entitled ******* one-percenter can't help but screw the working man.
TV: Game of Thrones | Season 6 | Part V (NO BOOK DISCUSSION - NO SPOILERS!)
- Thread starter kdb209
- Start date
-
HFBoards is well aware that today is election day in the US. We ask respectfully to focus on hockey and not politics.
- Status
Yeah, it's clear it had to be done, i just wish it was a bit clearer why. In the end, the entitled ******* one-percenter can't help but screw the working man.
Amazing Kreiderman
Registered User
- Apr 11, 2011
- 45,001
- 40,707
Damn, I thought I had a good answer and you just completely negated that LOL
BenningHurtsMySoul
Unfair Huggy Bear
Random Forest
Registered User
- May 12, 2010
- 14,636
- 1,331
Lol, hey, you're probably still right. The spears that were lined up were probably made out of the dragonglass Sam gave them.
darko
Registered User
- Feb 16, 2009
- 70,272
- 7,803
darko
Registered User
- Feb 16, 2009
- 70,272
- 7,803
F L Y E R S
Orange & Black
Would be funny if they never showed the Dorne story ever again.
They just stopped after the deaths of the King and Prince, by the sand snakes, and were just like 'why bother'
They just stopped after the deaths of the King and Prince, by the sand snakes, and were just like 'why bother'
Super Cake
Registered User
- Jun 24, 2013
- 31,138
- 6,604
Dick Sledge
The Tactleneck
- Feb 11, 2009
- 9,647
- 1,694
Amazing Kreiderman
Registered User
- Apr 11, 2011
- 45,001
- 40,707
Would be funny if they never showed the Dorne story ever again.
They just stopped after the deaths of the King and Prince, by the sand snakes, and were just like 'why bother'
Well, I hope they just kill off Arya so we can be done with The House of Dull and Boring.
McDNicks17
Moderator
Conspiracy theories are going to be rampant now that we know Bran(and probably the Raven(s) before him) can affect the past.
Or maybe instead of killing off characters when their storylines get tedious, they can move them on to the relevance they'll have to the plot that they're clearly being saved for (E.G. the Greyjoys)
agreed. but of course she's going to prob come back to westeros by the end of the year.
But why is the only option killing off the character when their story gets boring? I'm sure at some point with that logic we could've killed off Jon Snow in season 1.
It's like, is their potential to become interesting or relevant completely negated when a certain storyline gets dull? Just kill them off because they have no future? Like what?
Tasty Biscuits
with fancy sauce
That'd also bring things full circle pretty nicely (if that's the word you'd use, haha). Bran the builder in instrumental in the creation of the wall, and Bran Stark is instrumental in dooming it.
StrictlyCommercial
Registered User
Dick Sledge
The Tactleneck
- Feb 11, 2009
- 9,647
- 1,694
With Bran affecting past events to create present day as we see them. I'm wondering if he's the reason Dany and Viserys escaped.
McDNicks17
Moderator
You don't think Bran warging into Hodor while in the past Hodored Hodor?
darko
Registered User
- Feb 16, 2009
- 70,272
- 7,803
Siamese Dream
Registered User
So looks like Marg is doing the penance walk next episode, but the soldiers are at the bottom of the steps so it would seem like they will agree to let her do it to get her out in the open where they can attack the sparrows and rescue her at the same time
Maybe Cersei tries to have her murdered by zombie mountain in the fracas
Maybe Cersei tries to have her murdered by zombie mountain in the fracas
Random Forest
Registered User
- May 12, 2010
- 14,636
- 1,331
Of course it did. That doesn't mean the past was changed. That was always "the past". In other words, it did not construct an alternative timeline. Our story still has one consistent timeline that is not affected by the ability to go into the past and alter past events.
McDNicks17
Moderator
I didn't say he could change the past. I said he could affect it.
I'm meaning there's going to be tons of theories about Bran being behind things that happened in the past. For example, there's a theory that Bran is behind the Mad King's "burn them all" over on reddit. There's another that Bran was the boar that killed Robert haha.
I'm talking about stuff like that. I'm not saying Bran is going to go back in time, save the Starks and live happily ever after.
Siamese Dream
Registered User
That seems correct, think of the time travel rules in Harry Potter (Prisoner of Azkaban) and Interstellar
All the things they do when they go back in time had already happened. He figures it out in Harry Potter, he says he knew he could cast the patronus to save himself because he had already done it. In Interstellar he writes the co-ordinates of NASA with the dust or whatever, which had already happened at the start.
It's different to Back to the Future where events can actually be signficiantly altered by the time travel. There is an original timeline where he never went to 1955 then he creates a new one where he does.
The Terminator series is just a mess with the time travel rules because at first it leads you to believe there's only one timeline because of the conception of John Connor, he had to go back in time and do it with Sarah because he had already done it, but then later they are able to alter the timeline to stop judgement day
- Status
